Cargando…
Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking
In computational biology and other sciences, researchers are frequently faced with a choice between several computational methods for performing data analyses. Benchmarking studies aim to rigorously compare the performance of different methods using well-characterized benchmark datasets, to determin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1738-8 |
_version_ | 1783428613351145472 |
---|---|
author | Weber, Lukas M. Saelens, Wouter Cannoodt, Robrecht Soneson, Charlotte Hapfelmeier, Alexander Gardner, Paul P. Boulesteix, Anne-Laure Saeys, Yvan Robinson, Mark D. |
author_facet | Weber, Lukas M. Saelens, Wouter Cannoodt, Robrecht Soneson, Charlotte Hapfelmeier, Alexander Gardner, Paul P. Boulesteix, Anne-Laure Saeys, Yvan Robinson, Mark D. |
author_sort | Weber, Lukas M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In computational biology and other sciences, researchers are frequently faced with a choice between several computational methods for performing data analyses. Benchmarking studies aim to rigorously compare the performance of different methods using well-characterized benchmark datasets, to determine the strengths of each method or to provide recommendations regarding suitable choices of methods for an analysis. However, benchmarking studies must be carefully designed and implemented to provide accurate, unbiased, and informative results. Here, we summarize key practical guidelines and recommendations for performing high-quality benchmarking analyses, based on our experiences in computational biology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6584985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65849852019-06-27 Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking Weber, Lukas M. Saelens, Wouter Cannoodt, Robrecht Soneson, Charlotte Hapfelmeier, Alexander Gardner, Paul P. Boulesteix, Anne-Laure Saeys, Yvan Robinson, Mark D. Genome Biol Review In computational biology and other sciences, researchers are frequently faced with a choice between several computational methods for performing data analyses. Benchmarking studies aim to rigorously compare the performance of different methods using well-characterized benchmark datasets, to determine the strengths of each method or to provide recommendations regarding suitable choices of methods for an analysis. However, benchmarking studies must be carefully designed and implemented to provide accurate, unbiased, and informative results. Here, we summarize key practical guidelines and recommendations for performing high-quality benchmarking analyses, based on our experiences in computational biology. BioMed Central 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6584985/ /pubmed/31221194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1738-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Weber, Lukas M. Saelens, Wouter Cannoodt, Robrecht Soneson, Charlotte Hapfelmeier, Alexander Gardner, Paul P. Boulesteix, Anne-Laure Saeys, Yvan Robinson, Mark D. Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking |
title | Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking |
title_full | Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking |
title_fullStr | Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking |
title_full_unstemmed | Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking |
title_short | Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking |
title_sort | essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1738-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weberlukasm essentialguidelinesforcomputationalmethodbenchmarking AT saelenswouter essentialguidelinesforcomputationalmethodbenchmarking AT cannoodtrobrecht essentialguidelinesforcomputationalmethodbenchmarking AT sonesoncharlotte essentialguidelinesforcomputationalmethodbenchmarking AT hapfelmeieralexander essentialguidelinesforcomputationalmethodbenchmarking AT gardnerpaulp essentialguidelinesforcomputationalmethodbenchmarking AT boulesteixannelaure essentialguidelinesforcomputationalmethodbenchmarking AT saeysyvan essentialguidelinesforcomputationalmethodbenchmarking AT robinsonmarkd essentialguidelinesforcomputationalmethodbenchmarking |