Cargando…

Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol

BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited, cancer predisposition syndrome associated with an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and other cancer types. Identifying individuals with LS allows access to cancer risk management strategies proven to reduce cancer incidence and improve surviv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morrow, April, Hogden, Emily, Kang, Yoon-Jung, Steinberg, Julia, Canfell, Karen, Solomon, Michael J., Kench, James G., Gill, Anthony J., Shaw, Tim, Pachter, Nicholas, Parkinson, Bonny, Wolfenden, Luke, Mitchell, Gillian, Macrae, Finlay, Tucker, Kathy, Taylor, Natalie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6
_version_ 1783428621258457088
author Morrow, April
Hogden, Emily
Kang, Yoon-Jung
Steinberg, Julia
Canfell, Karen
Solomon, Michael J.
Kench, James G.
Gill, Anthony J.
Shaw, Tim
Pachter, Nicholas
Parkinson, Bonny
Wolfenden, Luke
Mitchell, Gillian
Macrae, Finlay
Tucker, Kathy
Taylor, Natalie
author_facet Morrow, April
Hogden, Emily
Kang, Yoon-Jung
Steinberg, Julia
Canfell, Karen
Solomon, Michael J.
Kench, James G.
Gill, Anthony J.
Shaw, Tim
Pachter, Nicholas
Parkinson, Bonny
Wolfenden, Luke
Mitchell, Gillian
Macrae, Finlay
Tucker, Kathy
Taylor, Natalie
author_sort Morrow, April
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited, cancer predisposition syndrome associated with an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and other cancer types. Identifying individuals with LS allows access to cancer risk management strategies proven to reduce cancer incidence and improve survival. However, LS is underdiagnosed and genetic referral rates are poor. Improving LS referral is complex, and requires multisystem behaviour change. Although barriers have been identified, evidence-based strategies to facilitate behaviour change are lacking. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a theory-based implementation approach against a non-theory based approach for improving detection of LS amongst Australian patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A two-arm parallel cluster randomised trial design will be used to compare two identical, structured implementation approaches, distinguished only by the use of theory to identify barriers and design targeted intervention strategies, to improve LS referral practices in eight large Australian hospital networks. Each hospital network will be randomly allocated to a trial arm, with stratification by state. A trained healthcare professional will lead the following phases at each site: (1) undertake baseline clinical practice audits, (2) form multidisciplinary Implementation Teams, (3) identify target behaviours for practice change, (4) identify barriers to change, (5) generate intervention strategies, (6) support staff to implement interventions and (7) evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention using post-implementation clinical data. The theoretical and non-theoretical components of each trial arm will be distinguished in phases 4–5. Study outcomes include a LS referral process map for each hospital network, with evaluation of the proportion of patients with risk-appropriate completion of the LS referral pathway within 2 months of CRC resection pre and post implementation. DISCUSSION: This trial will determine the more effective approach for improving the detection of LS amongst patients with CRC, whilst also advancing understanding of the impact of theory-based implementation approaches in complex health systems and the feasibility of training healthcare professionals to use them. Insights gained will guide the development of future interventions to improve LS identification on a larger scale and across different contexts, as well as efforts to address the gap between evidence and practice in the rapidly evolving field of genomic research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR, ACTRN12618001072202. Registered on 27 June 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6585019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65850192019-06-27 Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol Morrow, April Hogden, Emily Kang, Yoon-Jung Steinberg, Julia Canfell, Karen Solomon, Michael J. Kench, James G. Gill, Anthony J. Shaw, Tim Pachter, Nicholas Parkinson, Bonny Wolfenden, Luke Mitchell, Gillian Macrae, Finlay Tucker, Kathy Taylor, Natalie Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited, cancer predisposition syndrome associated with an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and other cancer types. Identifying individuals with LS allows access to cancer risk management strategies proven to reduce cancer incidence and improve survival. However, LS is underdiagnosed and genetic referral rates are poor. Improving LS referral is complex, and requires multisystem behaviour change. Although barriers have been identified, evidence-based strategies to facilitate behaviour change are lacking. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a theory-based implementation approach against a non-theory based approach for improving detection of LS amongst Australian patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A two-arm parallel cluster randomised trial design will be used to compare two identical, structured implementation approaches, distinguished only by the use of theory to identify barriers and design targeted intervention strategies, to improve LS referral practices in eight large Australian hospital networks. Each hospital network will be randomly allocated to a trial arm, with stratification by state. A trained healthcare professional will lead the following phases at each site: (1) undertake baseline clinical practice audits, (2) form multidisciplinary Implementation Teams, (3) identify target behaviours for practice change, (4) identify barriers to change, (5) generate intervention strategies, (6) support staff to implement interventions and (7) evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention using post-implementation clinical data. The theoretical and non-theoretical components of each trial arm will be distinguished in phases 4–5. Study outcomes include a LS referral process map for each hospital network, with evaluation of the proportion of patients with risk-appropriate completion of the LS referral pathway within 2 months of CRC resection pre and post implementation. DISCUSSION: This trial will determine the more effective approach for improving the detection of LS amongst patients with CRC, whilst also advancing understanding of the impact of theory-based implementation approaches in complex health systems and the feasibility of training healthcare professionals to use them. Insights gained will guide the development of future interventions to improve LS identification on a larger scale and across different contexts, as well as efforts to address the gap between evidence and practice in the rapidly evolving field of genomic research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR, ACTRN12618001072202. Registered on 27 June 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6585019/ /pubmed/31221211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Morrow, April
Hogden, Emily
Kang, Yoon-Jung
Steinberg, Julia
Canfell, Karen
Solomon, Michael J.
Kench, James G.
Gill, Anthony J.
Shaw, Tim
Pachter, Nicholas
Parkinson, Bonny
Wolfenden, Luke
Mitchell, Gillian
Macrae, Finlay
Tucker, Kathy
Taylor, Natalie
Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol
title Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol
title_full Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol
title_fullStr Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol
title_short Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol
title_sort comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6
work_keys_str_mv AT morrowapril comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT hogdenemily comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT kangyoonjung comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT steinbergjulia comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT canfellkaren comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT solomonmichaelj comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT kenchjamesg comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT gillanthonyj comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT shawtim comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT pachternicholas comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT parkinsonbonny comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT wolfendenluke comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT mitchellgillian comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT macraefinlay comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT tuckerkathy comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT taylornatalie comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol