Cargando…
Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol
BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited, cancer predisposition syndrome associated with an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and other cancer types. Identifying individuals with LS allows access to cancer risk management strategies proven to reduce cancer incidence and improve surviv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6 |
_version_ | 1783428621258457088 |
---|---|
author | Morrow, April Hogden, Emily Kang, Yoon-Jung Steinberg, Julia Canfell, Karen Solomon, Michael J. Kench, James G. Gill, Anthony J. Shaw, Tim Pachter, Nicholas Parkinson, Bonny Wolfenden, Luke Mitchell, Gillian Macrae, Finlay Tucker, Kathy Taylor, Natalie |
author_facet | Morrow, April Hogden, Emily Kang, Yoon-Jung Steinberg, Julia Canfell, Karen Solomon, Michael J. Kench, James G. Gill, Anthony J. Shaw, Tim Pachter, Nicholas Parkinson, Bonny Wolfenden, Luke Mitchell, Gillian Macrae, Finlay Tucker, Kathy Taylor, Natalie |
author_sort | Morrow, April |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited, cancer predisposition syndrome associated with an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and other cancer types. Identifying individuals with LS allows access to cancer risk management strategies proven to reduce cancer incidence and improve survival. However, LS is underdiagnosed and genetic referral rates are poor. Improving LS referral is complex, and requires multisystem behaviour change. Although barriers have been identified, evidence-based strategies to facilitate behaviour change are lacking. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a theory-based implementation approach against a non-theory based approach for improving detection of LS amongst Australian patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A two-arm parallel cluster randomised trial design will be used to compare two identical, structured implementation approaches, distinguished only by the use of theory to identify barriers and design targeted intervention strategies, to improve LS referral practices in eight large Australian hospital networks. Each hospital network will be randomly allocated to a trial arm, with stratification by state. A trained healthcare professional will lead the following phases at each site: (1) undertake baseline clinical practice audits, (2) form multidisciplinary Implementation Teams, (3) identify target behaviours for practice change, (4) identify barriers to change, (5) generate intervention strategies, (6) support staff to implement interventions and (7) evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention using post-implementation clinical data. The theoretical and non-theoretical components of each trial arm will be distinguished in phases 4–5. Study outcomes include a LS referral process map for each hospital network, with evaluation of the proportion of patients with risk-appropriate completion of the LS referral pathway within 2 months of CRC resection pre and post implementation. DISCUSSION: This trial will determine the more effective approach for improving the detection of LS amongst patients with CRC, whilst also advancing understanding of the impact of theory-based implementation approaches in complex health systems and the feasibility of training healthcare professionals to use them. Insights gained will guide the development of future interventions to improve LS identification on a larger scale and across different contexts, as well as efforts to address the gap between evidence and practice in the rapidly evolving field of genomic research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR, ACTRN12618001072202. Registered on 27 June 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6585019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65850192019-06-27 Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol Morrow, April Hogden, Emily Kang, Yoon-Jung Steinberg, Julia Canfell, Karen Solomon, Michael J. Kench, James G. Gill, Anthony J. Shaw, Tim Pachter, Nicholas Parkinson, Bonny Wolfenden, Luke Mitchell, Gillian Macrae, Finlay Tucker, Kathy Taylor, Natalie Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited, cancer predisposition syndrome associated with an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and other cancer types. Identifying individuals with LS allows access to cancer risk management strategies proven to reduce cancer incidence and improve survival. However, LS is underdiagnosed and genetic referral rates are poor. Improving LS referral is complex, and requires multisystem behaviour change. Although barriers have been identified, evidence-based strategies to facilitate behaviour change are lacking. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a theory-based implementation approach against a non-theory based approach for improving detection of LS amongst Australian patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A two-arm parallel cluster randomised trial design will be used to compare two identical, structured implementation approaches, distinguished only by the use of theory to identify barriers and design targeted intervention strategies, to improve LS referral practices in eight large Australian hospital networks. Each hospital network will be randomly allocated to a trial arm, with stratification by state. A trained healthcare professional will lead the following phases at each site: (1) undertake baseline clinical practice audits, (2) form multidisciplinary Implementation Teams, (3) identify target behaviours for practice change, (4) identify barriers to change, (5) generate intervention strategies, (6) support staff to implement interventions and (7) evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention using post-implementation clinical data. The theoretical and non-theoretical components of each trial arm will be distinguished in phases 4–5. Study outcomes include a LS referral process map for each hospital network, with evaluation of the proportion of patients with risk-appropriate completion of the LS referral pathway within 2 months of CRC resection pre and post implementation. DISCUSSION: This trial will determine the more effective approach for improving the detection of LS amongst patients with CRC, whilst also advancing understanding of the impact of theory-based implementation approaches in complex health systems and the feasibility of training healthcare professionals to use them. Insights gained will guide the development of future interventions to improve LS identification on a larger scale and across different contexts, as well as efforts to address the gap between evidence and practice in the rapidly evolving field of genomic research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR, ACTRN12618001072202. Registered on 27 June 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6585019/ /pubmed/31221211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Morrow, April Hogden, Emily Kang, Yoon-Jung Steinberg, Julia Canfell, Karen Solomon, Michael J. Kench, James G. Gill, Anthony J. Shaw, Tim Pachter, Nicholas Parkinson, Bonny Wolfenden, Luke Mitchell, Gillian Macrae, Finlay Tucker, Kathy Taylor, Natalie Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol |
title | Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol |
title_full | Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol |
title_fullStr | Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol |
title_short | Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol |
title_sort | comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morrowapril comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT hogdenemily comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT kangyoonjung comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT steinbergjulia comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT canfellkaren comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT solomonmichaelj comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT kenchjamesg comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT gillanthonyj comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT shawtim comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT pachternicholas comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT parkinsonbonny comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT wolfendenluke comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT mitchellgillian comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT macraefinlay comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT tuckerkathy comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol AT taylornatalie comparingtheoryandnontheorybasedimplementationapproachestoimprovingreferralpracticesincancergeneticsaclusterrandomisedtrialprotocol |