Cargando…

An online experiment to assess bias in professional medical coding

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have documented bias in medical decision making, but no studies have examined whether this bias extends to medical coding practices. Medical coding is foundational to the US health care enterprise. We evaluate whether bias based on patient characteristics influences spec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torres, Jacqueline M., Hessler-Jones, Danielle, Yarbrough, Carol, Tapley, Adam, Jimenez, Raemarie, Gottlieb, Laura M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0832-x
_version_ 1783428631800840192
author Torres, Jacqueline M.
Hessler-Jones, Danielle
Yarbrough, Carol
Tapley, Adam
Jimenez, Raemarie
Gottlieb, Laura M.
author_facet Torres, Jacqueline M.
Hessler-Jones, Danielle
Yarbrough, Carol
Tapley, Adam
Jimenez, Raemarie
Gottlieb, Laura M.
author_sort Torres, Jacqueline M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have documented bias in medical decision making, but no studies have examined whether this bias extends to medical coding practices. Medical coding is foundational to the US health care enterprise. We evaluate whether bias based on patient characteristics influences specific coding practices of professional medical coders. METHODS: This is an online experimental study of members of a national professional medical coding organization. Participants were randomly assigned a set of six clinical scenarios reflecting common medical conditions and asked to report encounter level of service codes for these clinical scenarios. Clinical scenarios differed by patient demographics (race, age, gender, ability) or social context (food insecurity, housing security) but were otherwise identical. We estimated Ordinary Least Squares regression models to evaluate differences in outcome average visit level of service by patient demographic characteristics described in the clinical scenarios; we adjusted for coders’ age, gender, race, and years of coding experience. RESULTS: The final analytic sample included 586 respondents who coded at least one clinical scenario. Higher mean level of service was assigned to clinical scenarios describing seniors compared to middle-aged patients in two otherwise identical scenarios, one a patient with type II diabetes mellitus (Coef: 0.28, SE: 0.15) and the other with rheumatoid arthritis (Coef: 0.30, SE: 0.13). Charts describing women were assigned lower level of service than men in patients with asthma exacerbation (Coef: -0.25, SE: 0.13) and rheumatoid arthritis (Coef: -0.20, SE: 0.12). There were no other significant differences in mean complexity score by patient demographics or social needs. CONCLUSION: We found limited evidence of bias in professional medical coding practice by patient age and gender, though findings were inconsistent across medical conditions. Low levels of observed bias may reflect medical coding workflow and training practices. Future research is needed to better understand bias in coding and to identify effective and generalizable bias prevention practices. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0832-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6585065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65850652019-06-27 An online experiment to assess bias in professional medical coding Torres, Jacqueline M. Hessler-Jones, Danielle Yarbrough, Carol Tapley, Adam Jimenez, Raemarie Gottlieb, Laura M. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have documented bias in medical decision making, but no studies have examined whether this bias extends to medical coding practices. Medical coding is foundational to the US health care enterprise. We evaluate whether bias based on patient characteristics influences specific coding practices of professional medical coders. METHODS: This is an online experimental study of members of a national professional medical coding organization. Participants were randomly assigned a set of six clinical scenarios reflecting common medical conditions and asked to report encounter level of service codes for these clinical scenarios. Clinical scenarios differed by patient demographics (race, age, gender, ability) or social context (food insecurity, housing security) but were otherwise identical. We estimated Ordinary Least Squares regression models to evaluate differences in outcome average visit level of service by patient demographic characteristics described in the clinical scenarios; we adjusted for coders’ age, gender, race, and years of coding experience. RESULTS: The final analytic sample included 586 respondents who coded at least one clinical scenario. Higher mean level of service was assigned to clinical scenarios describing seniors compared to middle-aged patients in two otherwise identical scenarios, one a patient with type II diabetes mellitus (Coef: 0.28, SE: 0.15) and the other with rheumatoid arthritis (Coef: 0.30, SE: 0.13). Charts describing women were assigned lower level of service than men in patients with asthma exacerbation (Coef: -0.25, SE: 0.13) and rheumatoid arthritis (Coef: -0.20, SE: 0.12). There were no other significant differences in mean complexity score by patient demographics or social needs. CONCLUSION: We found limited evidence of bias in professional medical coding practice by patient age and gender, though findings were inconsistent across medical conditions. Low levels of observed bias may reflect medical coding workflow and training practices. Future research is needed to better understand bias in coding and to identify effective and generalizable bias prevention practices. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0832-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6585065/ /pubmed/31221169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0832-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Torres, Jacqueline M.
Hessler-Jones, Danielle
Yarbrough, Carol
Tapley, Adam
Jimenez, Raemarie
Gottlieb, Laura M.
An online experiment to assess bias in professional medical coding
title An online experiment to assess bias in professional medical coding
title_full An online experiment to assess bias in professional medical coding
title_fullStr An online experiment to assess bias in professional medical coding
title_full_unstemmed An online experiment to assess bias in professional medical coding
title_short An online experiment to assess bias in professional medical coding
title_sort online experiment to assess bias in professional medical coding
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0832-x
work_keys_str_mv AT torresjacquelinem anonlineexperimenttoassessbiasinprofessionalmedicalcoding
AT hesslerjonesdanielle anonlineexperimenttoassessbiasinprofessionalmedicalcoding
AT yarbroughcarol anonlineexperimenttoassessbiasinprofessionalmedicalcoding
AT tapleyadam anonlineexperimenttoassessbiasinprofessionalmedicalcoding
AT jimenezraemarie anonlineexperimenttoassessbiasinprofessionalmedicalcoding
AT gottlieblauram anonlineexperimenttoassessbiasinprofessionalmedicalcoding
AT torresjacquelinem onlineexperimenttoassessbiasinprofessionalmedicalcoding
AT hesslerjonesdanielle onlineexperimenttoassessbiasinprofessionalmedicalcoding
AT yarbroughcarol onlineexperimenttoassessbiasinprofessionalmedicalcoding
AT tapleyadam onlineexperimenttoassessbiasinprofessionalmedicalcoding
AT jimenezraemarie onlineexperimenttoassessbiasinprofessionalmedicalcoding
AT gottlieblauram onlineexperimenttoassessbiasinprofessionalmedicalcoding