Cargando…

Evaluability assessment of “growing healthy communities,” a mini-grant program to improve access to healthy foods and places for physical activity

BACKGROUND: Mini-grants have been used to stimulate multisector collaboration in support of public health initiatives by funding non-traditional partners, such as economic development organizations. Such mini-grants have the potential to increase access to healthy foods and places for physical activ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abildso, Christiaan G., Dyer, Angela, Daily, Shay M., Bias, Thomas K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7156-8
_version_ 1783428645541380096
author Abildso, Christiaan G.
Dyer, Angela
Daily, Shay M.
Bias, Thomas K.
author_facet Abildso, Christiaan G.
Dyer, Angela
Daily, Shay M.
Bias, Thomas K.
author_sort Abildso, Christiaan G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mini-grants have been used to stimulate multisector collaboration in support of public health initiatives by funding non-traditional partners, such as economic development organizations. Such mini-grants have the potential to increase access to healthy foods and places for physical activity through built environment change, especially in small and rural towns in the United States. Although a promising practice, few mini-grant evaluations have been done. Therefore, our purpose was to conduct an Evaluability Assessment (EA), which is a process that can help promising programs that lack evidence advance toward full-scale evaluation. Specifically, we conducted an Evaluability Assessment of a statewide mini-grant program, called “Growing Healthy Communities” (GHC), to determine if this program was ready for evaluation and identify any changes needed for future implementation and evaluation that could also inform similar programs. METHODS: Telephone interviews with directors of six past mini-grant recipient organizations were conducted to assess implementation and evaluability. The six interviews were split equally among agencies receiving funding for food-oriented projects and physical activity-oriented projects. Within- and cross-case thematic analyses of interview transcripts were conducted. RESULTS: Organizational capacity was a universal theme, reflecting other key themes (described in detail in the manuscript) that affected program implementation and evaluation, including collaboration, limited time and measurement integration. Conclusions. The EA process provided pilot data that suggest that other state, regional, and national funders should provide centralized assistance for data collection and evaluation from the outset of a mini-grant award program. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7156-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6585124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65851242019-06-27 Evaluability assessment of “growing healthy communities,” a mini-grant program to improve access to healthy foods and places for physical activity Abildso, Christiaan G. Dyer, Angela Daily, Shay M. Bias, Thomas K. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Mini-grants have been used to stimulate multisector collaboration in support of public health initiatives by funding non-traditional partners, such as economic development organizations. Such mini-grants have the potential to increase access to healthy foods and places for physical activity through built environment change, especially in small and rural towns in the United States. Although a promising practice, few mini-grant evaluations have been done. Therefore, our purpose was to conduct an Evaluability Assessment (EA), which is a process that can help promising programs that lack evidence advance toward full-scale evaluation. Specifically, we conducted an Evaluability Assessment of a statewide mini-grant program, called “Growing Healthy Communities” (GHC), to determine if this program was ready for evaluation and identify any changes needed for future implementation and evaluation that could also inform similar programs. METHODS: Telephone interviews with directors of six past mini-grant recipient organizations were conducted to assess implementation and evaluability. The six interviews were split equally among agencies receiving funding for food-oriented projects and physical activity-oriented projects. Within- and cross-case thematic analyses of interview transcripts were conducted. RESULTS: Organizational capacity was a universal theme, reflecting other key themes (described in detail in the manuscript) that affected program implementation and evaluation, including collaboration, limited time and measurement integration. Conclusions. The EA process provided pilot data that suggest that other state, regional, and national funders should provide centralized assistance for data collection and evaluation from the outset of a mini-grant award program. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7156-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6585124/ /pubmed/31221120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7156-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abildso, Christiaan G.
Dyer, Angela
Daily, Shay M.
Bias, Thomas K.
Evaluability assessment of “growing healthy communities,” a mini-grant program to improve access to healthy foods and places for physical activity
title Evaluability assessment of “growing healthy communities,” a mini-grant program to improve access to healthy foods and places for physical activity
title_full Evaluability assessment of “growing healthy communities,” a mini-grant program to improve access to healthy foods and places for physical activity
title_fullStr Evaluability assessment of “growing healthy communities,” a mini-grant program to improve access to healthy foods and places for physical activity
title_full_unstemmed Evaluability assessment of “growing healthy communities,” a mini-grant program to improve access to healthy foods and places for physical activity
title_short Evaluability assessment of “growing healthy communities,” a mini-grant program to improve access to healthy foods and places for physical activity
title_sort evaluability assessment of “growing healthy communities,” a mini-grant program to improve access to healthy foods and places for physical activity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7156-8
work_keys_str_mv AT abildsochristiaang evaluabilityassessmentofgrowinghealthycommunitiesaminigrantprogramtoimproveaccesstohealthyfoodsandplacesforphysicalactivity
AT dyerangela evaluabilityassessmentofgrowinghealthycommunitiesaminigrantprogramtoimproveaccesstohealthyfoodsandplacesforphysicalactivity
AT dailyshaym evaluabilityassessmentofgrowinghealthycommunitiesaminigrantprogramtoimproveaccesstohealthyfoodsandplacesforphysicalactivity
AT biasthomask evaluabilityassessmentofgrowinghealthycommunitiesaminigrantprogramtoimproveaccesstohealthyfoodsandplacesforphysicalactivity