Cargando…

Evaluation of a Preclerkship Learning Community Model for Delivering Clinical Skills Curriculum

BACKGROUND: Medical schools are increasingly using learning communities (LCs) for clinical skills curriculum delivery despite little research on LCs employed for this purpose. We evaluated an LC model compared with a non-LC model for preclerkship clinical skills curriculum using Kirkpatrick’s hierar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roussel, Danielle, Anderson, Katherine, Glasgow, Tiffany, Colbert-Getz, Jorie M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31259252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120519855061
_version_ 1783428667668430848
author Roussel, Danielle
Anderson, Katherine
Glasgow, Tiffany
Colbert-Getz, Jorie M
author_facet Roussel, Danielle
Anderson, Katherine
Glasgow, Tiffany
Colbert-Getz, Jorie M
author_sort Roussel, Danielle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical schools are increasingly using learning communities (LCs) for clinical skills curriculum delivery despite little research on LCs employed for this purpose. We evaluated an LC model compared with a non-LC model for preclerkship clinical skills curriculum using Kirkpatrick’s hierarchy as an evaluation framework. METHODS: The first LC cohort’s (N = 101; matriculating Fall 2013) reaction to the LC model was assessed with self-reported surveys. Change in skills and learning transfer to clerkships was measured with objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) at the end of years 2 and 3 and first and last clerkship preceptor evaluations; the LC cohort and the prior cohort (N = 86; matriculating Fall 2012) that received clinical skills instruction in a non-LC format were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The LC model for preclerkship clinical skills curriculum was rated as excellent or good by 96% of respondents in Semesters 1 to 3 (N = 95). Across multiple performance domains, 96% to 99% of students were satisfied to very satisfied with their LC faculty preceptors (N varied by item). For the end of preclerkship OSCE, the LC cohort scored higher than the non-LC cohort in history gathering (P = .003, d = 0.50), physical examination (P = .019, d = 0.32), and encounter documentation (P ⩽ .001, d = 0.47); the non-LC cohort scored higher than the LC cohort in communication (P = .001, d = 0.43). For the end of year 3 OSCE, the LC cohort scored higher than the non-LC cohort in history gathering (P = .006, d = 0.50) and encounter note documentation (P = .027, d = 0.24); there was no difference in physical examination or communication scores between cohorts. There was no detectable difference between LC and non-LC student performance on the preceptor evaluation forms at either the beginning or end of the clerkship curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: We observed limited performance improvements for LC compared with non-LC students on the end of the preclerkship OSCE but not on the clerkship preceptor evaluations. Additional studies of LC models for clinical skills curriculum delivery are needed to further elucidate their impact on the professional development of medical students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6585236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65852362019-06-28 Evaluation of a Preclerkship Learning Community Model for Delivering Clinical Skills Curriculum Roussel, Danielle Anderson, Katherine Glasgow, Tiffany Colbert-Getz, Jorie M J Med Educ Curric Dev Original Research BACKGROUND: Medical schools are increasingly using learning communities (LCs) for clinical skills curriculum delivery despite little research on LCs employed for this purpose. We evaluated an LC model compared with a non-LC model for preclerkship clinical skills curriculum using Kirkpatrick’s hierarchy as an evaluation framework. METHODS: The first LC cohort’s (N = 101; matriculating Fall 2013) reaction to the LC model was assessed with self-reported surveys. Change in skills and learning transfer to clerkships was measured with objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) at the end of years 2 and 3 and first and last clerkship preceptor evaluations; the LC cohort and the prior cohort (N = 86; matriculating Fall 2012) that received clinical skills instruction in a non-LC format were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The LC model for preclerkship clinical skills curriculum was rated as excellent or good by 96% of respondents in Semesters 1 to 3 (N = 95). Across multiple performance domains, 96% to 99% of students were satisfied to very satisfied with their LC faculty preceptors (N varied by item). For the end of preclerkship OSCE, the LC cohort scored higher than the non-LC cohort in history gathering (P = .003, d = 0.50), physical examination (P = .019, d = 0.32), and encounter documentation (P ⩽ .001, d = 0.47); the non-LC cohort scored higher than the LC cohort in communication (P = .001, d = 0.43). For the end of year 3 OSCE, the LC cohort scored higher than the non-LC cohort in history gathering (P = .006, d = 0.50) and encounter note documentation (P = .027, d = 0.24); there was no difference in physical examination or communication scores between cohorts. There was no detectable difference between LC and non-LC student performance on the preceptor evaluation forms at either the beginning or end of the clerkship curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: We observed limited performance improvements for LC compared with non-LC students on the end of the preclerkship OSCE but not on the clerkship preceptor evaluations. Additional studies of LC models for clinical skills curriculum delivery are needed to further elucidate their impact on the professional development of medical students. SAGE Publications 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6585236/ /pubmed/31259252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120519855061 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Roussel, Danielle
Anderson, Katherine
Glasgow, Tiffany
Colbert-Getz, Jorie M
Evaluation of a Preclerkship Learning Community Model for Delivering Clinical Skills Curriculum
title Evaluation of a Preclerkship Learning Community Model for Delivering Clinical Skills Curriculum
title_full Evaluation of a Preclerkship Learning Community Model for Delivering Clinical Skills Curriculum
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Preclerkship Learning Community Model for Delivering Clinical Skills Curriculum
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Preclerkship Learning Community Model for Delivering Clinical Skills Curriculum
title_short Evaluation of a Preclerkship Learning Community Model for Delivering Clinical Skills Curriculum
title_sort evaluation of a preclerkship learning community model for delivering clinical skills curriculum
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31259252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120519855061
work_keys_str_mv AT rousseldanielle evaluationofapreclerkshiplearningcommunitymodelfordeliveringclinicalskillscurriculum
AT andersonkatherine evaluationofapreclerkshiplearningcommunitymodelfordeliveringclinicalskillscurriculum
AT glasgowtiffany evaluationofapreclerkshiplearningcommunitymodelfordeliveringclinicalskillscurriculum
AT colbertgetzjoriem evaluationofapreclerkshiplearningcommunitymodelfordeliveringclinicalskillscurriculum