Cargando…

Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who changed treatment from adalimumab to baricitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, during a phase III programme. METHODS: In phase III RA-BEAM, patients were randomised 3:3:2 to placebo, baricitinib 4 mg once daily, or adalimumab 40...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Yoshiya, Fautrel, Bruno, Keystone, Edward C, Ortmann, Robert A, Xie, Li, Zhu, Baojin, Issa, Maher, Patel, Himanshu, Gaich, Carol L, de Bono, Stephanie, Rooney, Terence P, Taylor, Peter C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214529
_version_ 1783428679805698048
author Tanaka, Yoshiya
Fautrel, Bruno
Keystone, Edward C
Ortmann, Robert A
Xie, Li
Zhu, Baojin
Issa, Maher
Patel, Himanshu
Gaich, Carol L
de Bono, Stephanie
Rooney, Terence P
Taylor, Peter C
author_facet Tanaka, Yoshiya
Fautrel, Bruno
Keystone, Edward C
Ortmann, Robert A
Xie, Li
Zhu, Baojin
Issa, Maher
Patel, Himanshu
Gaich, Carol L
de Bono, Stephanie
Rooney, Terence P
Taylor, Peter C
author_sort Tanaka, Yoshiya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who changed treatment from adalimumab to baricitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, during a phase III programme. METHODS: In phase III RA-BEAM, patients were randomised 3:3:2 to placebo, baricitinib 4 mg once daily, or adalimumab 40 mg biweekly. At week 16 or subsequent visits, non-responders were rescued to open-label baricitinib 4 mg. At week 52, patients could enter a long-term extension (LTE) and continue on baricitinib or switch from adalimumab to baricitinib 4 mg with no adalimumab washout period. Percentage of patients achieving low disease activity and remission were assessed, along with physical function, patient’s assessment of pain, and safety. RESULTS: Thirty-five (7%) baricitinib-treated and 40 (12%) adalimumab-treated patients were rescued to baricitinib in RA-BEAM; 78% (381/487) of baricitinib-treated and 72% (238/330) of adalimumab-treated patients who were not rescued in RA-BEAM, entered the LTE and continued/were switched to baricitinib. In both baricitinib-rescued and adalimumab-rescued patients, there were significant improvements in all measures up to 12 weeks after rescue compared with the time of rescue. Patients who switched from adalimumab to baricitinib showed improvements in disease control through 12 weeks in the LTE. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and infections, including serious events, were similar for patients who switched from adalimumab to baricitinib and those who continued on baricitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from adalimumab to baricitinib (without adalimumab washout) was associated with improvements in disease control, physical function and pain during the initial 12 weeks postswitch, without an increase in TEAEs, serious adverse events or infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01710358, NCT01885078.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6585288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65852882019-07-05 Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Tanaka, Yoshiya Fautrel, Bruno Keystone, Edward C Ortmann, Robert A Xie, Li Zhu, Baojin Issa, Maher Patel, Himanshu Gaich, Carol L de Bono, Stephanie Rooney, Terence P Taylor, Peter C Ann Rheum Dis Rheumatoid Arthritis OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who changed treatment from adalimumab to baricitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, during a phase III programme. METHODS: In phase III RA-BEAM, patients were randomised 3:3:2 to placebo, baricitinib 4 mg once daily, or adalimumab 40 mg biweekly. At week 16 or subsequent visits, non-responders were rescued to open-label baricitinib 4 mg. At week 52, patients could enter a long-term extension (LTE) and continue on baricitinib or switch from adalimumab to baricitinib 4 mg with no adalimumab washout period. Percentage of patients achieving low disease activity and remission were assessed, along with physical function, patient’s assessment of pain, and safety. RESULTS: Thirty-five (7%) baricitinib-treated and 40 (12%) adalimumab-treated patients were rescued to baricitinib in RA-BEAM; 78% (381/487) of baricitinib-treated and 72% (238/330) of adalimumab-treated patients who were not rescued in RA-BEAM, entered the LTE and continued/were switched to baricitinib. In both baricitinib-rescued and adalimumab-rescued patients, there were significant improvements in all measures up to 12 weeks after rescue compared with the time of rescue. Patients who switched from adalimumab to baricitinib showed improvements in disease control through 12 weeks in the LTE. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and infections, including serious events, were similar for patients who switched from adalimumab to baricitinib and those who continued on baricitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from adalimumab to baricitinib (without adalimumab washout) was associated with improvements in disease control, physical function and pain during the initial 12 weeks postswitch, without an increase in TEAEs, serious adverse events or infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01710358, NCT01885078. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6585288/ /pubmed/31040122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214529 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rheumatoid Arthritis
Tanaka, Yoshiya
Fautrel, Bruno
Keystone, Edward C
Ortmann, Robert A
Xie, Li
Zhu, Baojin
Issa, Maher
Patel, Himanshu
Gaich, Carol L
de Bono, Stephanie
Rooney, Terence P
Taylor, Peter C
Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase iii data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
topic Rheumatoid Arthritis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214529
work_keys_str_mv AT tanakayoshiya clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT fautrelbruno clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT keystoneedwardc clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT ortmannroberta clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT xieli clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT zhubaojin clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT issamaher clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT patelhimanshu clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT gaichcaroll clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT debonostephanie clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT rooneyterencep clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT taylorpeterc clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis