Cargando…
Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who changed treatment from adalimumab to baricitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, during a phase III programme. METHODS: In phase III RA-BEAM, patients were randomised 3:3:2 to placebo, baricitinib 4 mg once daily, or adalimumab 40...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214529 |
_version_ | 1783428679805698048 |
---|---|
author | Tanaka, Yoshiya Fautrel, Bruno Keystone, Edward C Ortmann, Robert A Xie, Li Zhu, Baojin Issa, Maher Patel, Himanshu Gaich, Carol L de Bono, Stephanie Rooney, Terence P Taylor, Peter C |
author_facet | Tanaka, Yoshiya Fautrel, Bruno Keystone, Edward C Ortmann, Robert A Xie, Li Zhu, Baojin Issa, Maher Patel, Himanshu Gaich, Carol L de Bono, Stephanie Rooney, Terence P Taylor, Peter C |
author_sort | Tanaka, Yoshiya |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who changed treatment from adalimumab to baricitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, during a phase III programme. METHODS: In phase III RA-BEAM, patients were randomised 3:3:2 to placebo, baricitinib 4 mg once daily, or adalimumab 40 mg biweekly. At week 16 or subsequent visits, non-responders were rescued to open-label baricitinib 4 mg. At week 52, patients could enter a long-term extension (LTE) and continue on baricitinib or switch from adalimumab to baricitinib 4 mg with no adalimumab washout period. Percentage of patients achieving low disease activity and remission were assessed, along with physical function, patient’s assessment of pain, and safety. RESULTS: Thirty-five (7%) baricitinib-treated and 40 (12%) adalimumab-treated patients were rescued to baricitinib in RA-BEAM; 78% (381/487) of baricitinib-treated and 72% (238/330) of adalimumab-treated patients who were not rescued in RA-BEAM, entered the LTE and continued/were switched to baricitinib. In both baricitinib-rescued and adalimumab-rescued patients, there were significant improvements in all measures up to 12 weeks after rescue compared with the time of rescue. Patients who switched from adalimumab to baricitinib showed improvements in disease control through 12 weeks in the LTE. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and infections, including serious events, were similar for patients who switched from adalimumab to baricitinib and those who continued on baricitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from adalimumab to baricitinib (without adalimumab washout) was associated with improvements in disease control, physical function and pain during the initial 12 weeks postswitch, without an increase in TEAEs, serious adverse events or infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01710358, NCT01885078. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6585288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65852882019-07-05 Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Tanaka, Yoshiya Fautrel, Bruno Keystone, Edward C Ortmann, Robert A Xie, Li Zhu, Baojin Issa, Maher Patel, Himanshu Gaich, Carol L de Bono, Stephanie Rooney, Terence P Taylor, Peter C Ann Rheum Dis Rheumatoid Arthritis OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who changed treatment from adalimumab to baricitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, during a phase III programme. METHODS: In phase III RA-BEAM, patients were randomised 3:3:2 to placebo, baricitinib 4 mg once daily, or adalimumab 40 mg biweekly. At week 16 or subsequent visits, non-responders were rescued to open-label baricitinib 4 mg. At week 52, patients could enter a long-term extension (LTE) and continue on baricitinib or switch from adalimumab to baricitinib 4 mg with no adalimumab washout period. Percentage of patients achieving low disease activity and remission were assessed, along with physical function, patient’s assessment of pain, and safety. RESULTS: Thirty-five (7%) baricitinib-treated and 40 (12%) adalimumab-treated patients were rescued to baricitinib in RA-BEAM; 78% (381/487) of baricitinib-treated and 72% (238/330) of adalimumab-treated patients who were not rescued in RA-BEAM, entered the LTE and continued/were switched to baricitinib. In both baricitinib-rescued and adalimumab-rescued patients, there were significant improvements in all measures up to 12 weeks after rescue compared with the time of rescue. Patients who switched from adalimumab to baricitinib showed improvements in disease control through 12 weeks in the LTE. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and infections, including serious events, were similar for patients who switched from adalimumab to baricitinib and those who continued on baricitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from adalimumab to baricitinib (without adalimumab washout) was associated with improvements in disease control, physical function and pain during the initial 12 weeks postswitch, without an increase in TEAEs, serious adverse events or infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01710358, NCT01885078. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6585288/ /pubmed/31040122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214529 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rheumatoid Arthritis Tanaka, Yoshiya Fautrel, Bruno Keystone, Edward C Ortmann, Robert A Xie, Li Zhu, Baojin Issa, Maher Patel, Himanshu Gaich, Carol L de Bono, Stephanie Rooney, Terence P Taylor, Peter C Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title | Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full | Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_fullStr | Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_short | Clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase III data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_sort | clinical outcomes in patients switched from adalimumab to baricitinib due to non-response and/or study design: phase iii data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
topic | Rheumatoid Arthritis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanakayoshiya clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT fautrelbruno clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT keystoneedwardc clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT ortmannroberta clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT xieli clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT zhubaojin clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT issamaher clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT patelhimanshu clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT gaichcaroll clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT debonostephanie clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT rooneyterencep clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT taylorpeterc clinicaloutcomesinpatientsswitchedfromadalimumabtobaricitinibduetononresponseandorstudydesignphaseiiidatainpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis |