Cargando…

Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching

Peer recovery support services (PRSS) are increasingly being employed in a range of clinical settings to assist individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and co-occurring psychological disorders. PRSS are peer-driven mentoring, education, and support ministrations delivered by individuals who, b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eddie, David, Hoffman, Lauren, Vilsaint, Corrie, Abry, Alexandra, Bergman, Brandon, Hoeppner, Bettina, Weinstein, Charles, Kelly, John F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31263434
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052
_version_ 1783428728766857216
author Eddie, David
Hoffman, Lauren
Vilsaint, Corrie
Abry, Alexandra
Bergman, Brandon
Hoeppner, Bettina
Weinstein, Charles
Kelly, John F.
author_facet Eddie, David
Hoffman, Lauren
Vilsaint, Corrie
Abry, Alexandra
Bergman, Brandon
Hoeppner, Bettina
Weinstein, Charles
Kelly, John F.
author_sort Eddie, David
collection PubMed
description Peer recovery support services (PRSS) are increasingly being employed in a range of clinical settings to assist individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and co-occurring psychological disorders. PRSS are peer-driven mentoring, education, and support ministrations delivered by individuals who, because of their own experience with SUD and SUD recovery, are experientially qualified to support peers currently experiencing SUD and associated problems. This systematic review characterizes the existing experimental, quasi-experimental, single- and multi-group prospective and retrospective, and cross-sectional research on PRSS. Findings to date tentatively speak to the potential of peer supports across a number of SUD treatment settings, as evidenced by positive findings on measures including reduced substance use and SUD relapse rates, improved relationships with treatment providers and social supports, increased treatment retention, and greater treatment satisfaction. These findings, however, should be viewed in light of many null findings to date, as well as significant methodological limitations of the existing literature, including inability to distinguish the effects of peer recovery support from other recovery support activities, heterogeneous populations, inconsistency in the definitions of peer workers and recovery coaches, and lack of any, or appropriate comparison groups. Further, role definitions for PRSS and the complexity of clinical boundaries for peers working in the field represent important implementation challenges presented by this novel class of approaches for SUD management. There remains a need for further rigorous investigation to establish the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-benefits of PRSS. Ultimately, such research may also help solidify PRSS role definitions, identify optimal training guidelines for peers, and establish for whom and under what conditions PRSS are most effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6585590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65855902019-07-01 Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching Eddie, David Hoffman, Lauren Vilsaint, Corrie Abry, Alexandra Bergman, Brandon Hoeppner, Bettina Weinstein, Charles Kelly, John F. Front Psychol Psychology Peer recovery support services (PRSS) are increasingly being employed in a range of clinical settings to assist individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and co-occurring psychological disorders. PRSS are peer-driven mentoring, education, and support ministrations delivered by individuals who, because of their own experience with SUD and SUD recovery, are experientially qualified to support peers currently experiencing SUD and associated problems. This systematic review characterizes the existing experimental, quasi-experimental, single- and multi-group prospective and retrospective, and cross-sectional research on PRSS. Findings to date tentatively speak to the potential of peer supports across a number of SUD treatment settings, as evidenced by positive findings on measures including reduced substance use and SUD relapse rates, improved relationships with treatment providers and social supports, increased treatment retention, and greater treatment satisfaction. These findings, however, should be viewed in light of many null findings to date, as well as significant methodological limitations of the existing literature, including inability to distinguish the effects of peer recovery support from other recovery support activities, heterogeneous populations, inconsistency in the definitions of peer workers and recovery coaches, and lack of any, or appropriate comparison groups. Further, role definitions for PRSS and the complexity of clinical boundaries for peers working in the field represent important implementation challenges presented by this novel class of approaches for SUD management. There remains a need for further rigorous investigation to establish the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-benefits of PRSS. Ultimately, such research may also help solidify PRSS role definitions, identify optimal training guidelines for peers, and establish for whom and under what conditions PRSS are most effective. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6585590/ /pubmed/31263434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052 Text en Copyright © 2019 Eddie, Hoffman, Vilsaint, Abry, Bergman, Hoeppner, Weinstein and Kelly. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Eddie, David
Hoffman, Lauren
Vilsaint, Corrie
Abry, Alexandra
Bergman, Brandon
Hoeppner, Bettina
Weinstein, Charles
Kelly, John F.
Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching
title Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching
title_full Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching
title_fullStr Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching
title_full_unstemmed Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching
title_short Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching
title_sort lived experience in new models of care for substance use disorder: a systematic review of peer recovery support services and recovery coaching
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31263434
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052
work_keys_str_mv AT eddiedavid livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching
AT hoffmanlauren livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching
AT vilsaintcorrie livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching
AT abryalexandra livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching
AT bergmanbrandon livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching
AT hoeppnerbettina livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching
AT weinsteincharles livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching
AT kellyjohnf livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching