Cargando…
Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching
Peer recovery support services (PRSS) are increasingly being employed in a range of clinical settings to assist individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and co-occurring psychological disorders. PRSS are peer-driven mentoring, education, and support ministrations delivered by individuals who, b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31263434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052 |
_version_ | 1783428728766857216 |
---|---|
author | Eddie, David Hoffman, Lauren Vilsaint, Corrie Abry, Alexandra Bergman, Brandon Hoeppner, Bettina Weinstein, Charles Kelly, John F. |
author_facet | Eddie, David Hoffman, Lauren Vilsaint, Corrie Abry, Alexandra Bergman, Brandon Hoeppner, Bettina Weinstein, Charles Kelly, John F. |
author_sort | Eddie, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Peer recovery support services (PRSS) are increasingly being employed in a range of clinical settings to assist individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and co-occurring psychological disorders. PRSS are peer-driven mentoring, education, and support ministrations delivered by individuals who, because of their own experience with SUD and SUD recovery, are experientially qualified to support peers currently experiencing SUD and associated problems. This systematic review characterizes the existing experimental, quasi-experimental, single- and multi-group prospective and retrospective, and cross-sectional research on PRSS. Findings to date tentatively speak to the potential of peer supports across a number of SUD treatment settings, as evidenced by positive findings on measures including reduced substance use and SUD relapse rates, improved relationships with treatment providers and social supports, increased treatment retention, and greater treatment satisfaction. These findings, however, should be viewed in light of many null findings to date, as well as significant methodological limitations of the existing literature, including inability to distinguish the effects of peer recovery support from other recovery support activities, heterogeneous populations, inconsistency in the definitions of peer workers and recovery coaches, and lack of any, or appropriate comparison groups. Further, role definitions for PRSS and the complexity of clinical boundaries for peers working in the field represent important implementation challenges presented by this novel class of approaches for SUD management. There remains a need for further rigorous investigation to establish the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-benefits of PRSS. Ultimately, such research may also help solidify PRSS role definitions, identify optimal training guidelines for peers, and establish for whom and under what conditions PRSS are most effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6585590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65855902019-07-01 Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching Eddie, David Hoffman, Lauren Vilsaint, Corrie Abry, Alexandra Bergman, Brandon Hoeppner, Bettina Weinstein, Charles Kelly, John F. Front Psychol Psychology Peer recovery support services (PRSS) are increasingly being employed in a range of clinical settings to assist individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and co-occurring psychological disorders. PRSS are peer-driven mentoring, education, and support ministrations delivered by individuals who, because of their own experience with SUD and SUD recovery, are experientially qualified to support peers currently experiencing SUD and associated problems. This systematic review characterizes the existing experimental, quasi-experimental, single- and multi-group prospective and retrospective, and cross-sectional research on PRSS. Findings to date tentatively speak to the potential of peer supports across a number of SUD treatment settings, as evidenced by positive findings on measures including reduced substance use and SUD relapse rates, improved relationships with treatment providers and social supports, increased treatment retention, and greater treatment satisfaction. These findings, however, should be viewed in light of many null findings to date, as well as significant methodological limitations of the existing literature, including inability to distinguish the effects of peer recovery support from other recovery support activities, heterogeneous populations, inconsistency in the definitions of peer workers and recovery coaches, and lack of any, or appropriate comparison groups. Further, role definitions for PRSS and the complexity of clinical boundaries for peers working in the field represent important implementation challenges presented by this novel class of approaches for SUD management. There remains a need for further rigorous investigation to establish the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-benefits of PRSS. Ultimately, such research may also help solidify PRSS role definitions, identify optimal training guidelines for peers, and establish for whom and under what conditions PRSS are most effective. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6585590/ /pubmed/31263434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052 Text en Copyright © 2019 Eddie, Hoffman, Vilsaint, Abry, Bergman, Hoeppner, Weinstein and Kelly. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Eddie, David Hoffman, Lauren Vilsaint, Corrie Abry, Alexandra Bergman, Brandon Hoeppner, Bettina Weinstein, Charles Kelly, John F. Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching |
title | Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching |
title_full | Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching |
title_fullStr | Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching |
title_full_unstemmed | Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching |
title_short | Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching |
title_sort | lived experience in new models of care for substance use disorder: a systematic review of peer recovery support services and recovery coaching |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31263434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eddiedavid livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching AT hoffmanlauren livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching AT vilsaintcorrie livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching AT abryalexandra livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching AT bergmanbrandon livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching AT hoeppnerbettina livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching AT weinsteincharles livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching AT kellyjohnf livedexperienceinnewmodelsofcareforsubstanceusedisorderasystematicreviewofpeerrecoverysupportservicesandrecoverycoaching |