Cargando…
The place for dementia‐friendly communities in England and its relationship with epidemiological need
OBJECTIVES: The dementia‐friendly community (DFC) initiative was set up to enable people living with dementia to remain active, engaged, and valued members of society. Dementia prevalence varies nationally and is strongly associated with the age and sex distribution of the population and level of so...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30248208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gps.4987 |
_version_ | 1783428737619984384 |
---|---|
author | Woodward, Michael Arthur, Antony Darlington, Nicole Buckner, Stefanie Killett, Anne Thurman, John Buswell, Marina Lafortune, Louise Mathie, Elspeth Mayrhofer, Andrea Goodman, Claire |
author_facet | Woodward, Michael Arthur, Antony Darlington, Nicole Buckner, Stefanie Killett, Anne Thurman, John Buswell, Marina Lafortune, Louise Mathie, Elspeth Mayrhofer, Andrea Goodman, Claire |
author_sort | Woodward, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The dementia‐friendly community (DFC) initiative was set up to enable people living with dementia to remain active, engaged, and valued members of society. Dementia prevalence varies nationally and is strongly associated with the age and sex distribution of the population and level of social deprivation. As part of a wider project to evaluate DFCs, we examined whether there is a relationship between provision of DFCs and epidemiological need. METHODS: Dementia‐friendly communities were identified through the formal recognition process of DFC status by the Alzheimer's Society and mapped against areas defined by English Clinical Commissioning Groups. We tested whether provision of a DFC was associated with: (1) dementia prevalence, (2) number of known cases, and (3) known plus estimated number of unknown cases. RESULTS: Of the 209 English Clinical Commissioning Group areas, 115 had at least one DFC. The presence of a DFC was significantly associated with number of known dementia cases (mean difference = 577; 95% CI, 249 to 905; P = 0.001) and unknown dementia cases (mean difference = 881; 95% CI, 349 to 1413; P = 0.001) but not prevalence (mean difference = 0.03; 95% CI, −0.09 to 0.16; P = 0.61). This remains true when controlling for potential confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that DFC provision is consistent with epidemiological‐based need. Dementia‐friendly communities are located in areas where they can have the greatest impact. A retrospective understanding of how DFCs have developed in England can inform how equivalent international initiatives might be designed and implemented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6585629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65856292019-06-27 The place for dementia‐friendly communities in England and its relationship with epidemiological need Woodward, Michael Arthur, Antony Darlington, Nicole Buckner, Stefanie Killett, Anne Thurman, John Buswell, Marina Lafortune, Louise Mathie, Elspeth Mayrhofer, Andrea Goodman, Claire Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Research Articles OBJECTIVES: The dementia‐friendly community (DFC) initiative was set up to enable people living with dementia to remain active, engaged, and valued members of society. Dementia prevalence varies nationally and is strongly associated with the age and sex distribution of the population and level of social deprivation. As part of a wider project to evaluate DFCs, we examined whether there is a relationship between provision of DFCs and epidemiological need. METHODS: Dementia‐friendly communities were identified through the formal recognition process of DFC status by the Alzheimer's Society and mapped against areas defined by English Clinical Commissioning Groups. We tested whether provision of a DFC was associated with: (1) dementia prevalence, (2) number of known cases, and (3) known plus estimated number of unknown cases. RESULTS: Of the 209 English Clinical Commissioning Group areas, 115 had at least one DFC. The presence of a DFC was significantly associated with number of known dementia cases (mean difference = 577; 95% CI, 249 to 905; P = 0.001) and unknown dementia cases (mean difference = 881; 95% CI, 349 to 1413; P = 0.001) but not prevalence (mean difference = 0.03; 95% CI, −0.09 to 0.16; P = 0.61). This remains true when controlling for potential confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that DFC provision is consistent with epidemiological‐based need. Dementia‐friendly communities are located in areas where they can have the greatest impact. A retrospective understanding of how DFCs have developed in England can inform how equivalent international initiatives might be designed and implemented. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-24 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6585629/ /pubmed/30248208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gps.4987 Text en © 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Woodward, Michael Arthur, Antony Darlington, Nicole Buckner, Stefanie Killett, Anne Thurman, John Buswell, Marina Lafortune, Louise Mathie, Elspeth Mayrhofer, Andrea Goodman, Claire The place for dementia‐friendly communities in England and its relationship with epidemiological need |
title | The place for dementia‐friendly communities in England and its relationship with epidemiological need |
title_full | The place for dementia‐friendly communities in England and its relationship with epidemiological need |
title_fullStr | The place for dementia‐friendly communities in England and its relationship with epidemiological need |
title_full_unstemmed | The place for dementia‐friendly communities in England and its relationship with epidemiological need |
title_short | The place for dementia‐friendly communities in England and its relationship with epidemiological need |
title_sort | place for dementia‐friendly communities in england and its relationship with epidemiological need |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30248208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gps.4987 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodwardmichael theplacefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT arthurantony theplacefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT darlingtonnicole theplacefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT bucknerstefanie theplacefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT killettanne theplacefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT thurmanjohn theplacefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT buswellmarina theplacefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT lafortunelouise theplacefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT mathieelspeth theplacefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT mayrhoferandrea theplacefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT goodmanclaire theplacefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT woodwardmichael placefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT arthurantony placefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT darlingtonnicole placefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT bucknerstefanie placefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT killettanne placefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT thurmanjohn placefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT buswellmarina placefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT lafortunelouise placefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT mathieelspeth placefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT mayrhoferandrea placefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed AT goodmanclaire placefordementiafriendlycommunitiesinenglandanditsrelationshipwithepidemiologicalneed |