Cargando…
Naloxone distribution and possession following a large‐scale naloxone programme
AIMS: To examine uptake following a large‐scale naloxone programme by estimating distribution rates since programme initiation and the proportion among a sample of high‐risk individuals who had attended naloxone training, currently possessed or had used naloxone. We also estimated the likelihood of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30129078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14425 |
_version_ | 1783428761721503744 |
---|---|
author | Madah‐Amiri, Desiree Gjersing, Linn Clausen, Thomas |
author_facet | Madah‐Amiri, Desiree Gjersing, Linn Clausen, Thomas |
author_sort | Madah‐Amiri, Desiree |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To examine uptake following a large‐scale naloxone programme by estimating distribution rates since programme initiation and the proportion among a sample of high‐risk individuals who had attended naloxone training, currently possessed or had used naloxone. We also estimated the likelihood of naloxone possession and use as a function of programme duration, individual descriptive and substance use indicators. DESIGN: (1) Distribution data (June 2014–August 2017) and date of implementation for each city and (2) a cross‐sectional study among a sample of illicit substance users interviewed September 2017. SETTING: Seven Norwegian cities. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 497 recruited users of illegal opioids and/or central stimulants. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes: naloxone possession and use. Random‐intercepts logistic regression models (covariates: male, age, homelessness/shelter use, overdose, incarceration, opioid maintenance treatment, income sources, substance use indicators, programme duration). FINDINGS: Overall, 4631 naloxone nasal sprays were distributed in the two pilot cities, with a cumulative rate of 495 per 100 000 population. In the same two cities, among high‐risk individuals, 44% and 62% reported current naloxone possession. The possession rates of naloxone corresponded well to the duration of each participating city's distribution programme. Overall, in the six distributing cities, 58% reported naloxone training, 43% current possession and 15% naloxone use. The significant indicators for possession were programme duration [adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI = 0.82–2.37], female gender (aOR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.20–3.24) and drug‐dealing (aOR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.42–3.93). The significant indicators for naloxone use were programme duration (aOR = 1.49 95%, CI = 1.15–1.92), homelessness/shelter use (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.02–4.17), opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) (aOR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.13–3.78), drug‐dealing (aOR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.27–4.54) and heroin injecting (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.04–4.38). CONCLUSIONS: A large‐scale naloxone programme in seven Norwegian cities with a cumulative distribution rate of 495 per 100 000 population indicated good saturation in a sample of high‐risk individuals, with programme duration in each city as an important indicator for naloxone possession and use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6585734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65857342019-06-27 Naloxone distribution and possession following a large‐scale naloxone programme Madah‐Amiri, Desiree Gjersing, Linn Clausen, Thomas Addiction Research Reports AIMS: To examine uptake following a large‐scale naloxone programme by estimating distribution rates since programme initiation and the proportion among a sample of high‐risk individuals who had attended naloxone training, currently possessed or had used naloxone. We also estimated the likelihood of naloxone possession and use as a function of programme duration, individual descriptive and substance use indicators. DESIGN: (1) Distribution data (June 2014–August 2017) and date of implementation for each city and (2) a cross‐sectional study among a sample of illicit substance users interviewed September 2017. SETTING: Seven Norwegian cities. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 497 recruited users of illegal opioids and/or central stimulants. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes: naloxone possession and use. Random‐intercepts logistic regression models (covariates: male, age, homelessness/shelter use, overdose, incarceration, opioid maintenance treatment, income sources, substance use indicators, programme duration). FINDINGS: Overall, 4631 naloxone nasal sprays were distributed in the two pilot cities, with a cumulative rate of 495 per 100 000 population. In the same two cities, among high‐risk individuals, 44% and 62% reported current naloxone possession. The possession rates of naloxone corresponded well to the duration of each participating city's distribution programme. Overall, in the six distributing cities, 58% reported naloxone training, 43% current possession and 15% naloxone use. The significant indicators for possession were programme duration [adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI = 0.82–2.37], female gender (aOR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.20–3.24) and drug‐dealing (aOR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.42–3.93). The significant indicators for naloxone use were programme duration (aOR = 1.49 95%, CI = 1.15–1.92), homelessness/shelter use (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.02–4.17), opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) (aOR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.13–3.78), drug‐dealing (aOR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.27–4.54) and heroin injecting (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.04–4.38). CONCLUSIONS: A large‐scale naloxone programme in seven Norwegian cities with a cumulative distribution rate of 495 per 100 000 population indicated good saturation in a sample of high‐risk individuals, with programme duration in each city as an important indicator for naloxone possession and use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-14 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6585734/ /pubmed/30129078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14425 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Reports Madah‐Amiri, Desiree Gjersing, Linn Clausen, Thomas Naloxone distribution and possession following a large‐scale naloxone programme |
title | Naloxone distribution and possession following a large‐scale naloxone programme |
title_full | Naloxone distribution and possession following a large‐scale naloxone programme |
title_fullStr | Naloxone distribution and possession following a large‐scale naloxone programme |
title_full_unstemmed | Naloxone distribution and possession following a large‐scale naloxone programme |
title_short | Naloxone distribution and possession following a large‐scale naloxone programme |
title_sort | naloxone distribution and possession following a large‐scale naloxone programme |
topic | Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30129078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14425 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madahamiridesiree naloxonedistributionandpossessionfollowingalargescalenaloxoneprogramme AT gjersinglinn naloxonedistributionandpossessionfollowingalargescalenaloxoneprogramme AT clausenthomas naloxonedistributionandpossessionfollowingalargescalenaloxoneprogramme |