Potential acceleration performance of a 256‐channel whole‐brain receive array at 7 T

PURPOSE: Assess the potential gain in acceleration performance of a 256‐channel versus 32‐channel receive coil array at 7 T in combination with a 2D CAIPIRINHA sequence for 3D data sets. METHODS: A 256‐channel receive setup was simulated by placing 2 small 16‐channel high‐density receive arrays at 2 [Formula: see text] 8 different locations on the head of healthy participants. Multiple consecutive measurements were performed and coil sensitivity maps were combined to form a complete 256‐channel data set. This setup was compared with a standard 32‐channel head coil, in terms of SNR, noise correlation, and acceleration performance (g‐factor). RESULTS: In the periphery of the brain, the receive SNR was on average a factor 1.5 higher (ranging up to a factor 2.7 higher) than the 32‐channel coil; in the center of the brain the SNR was comparable or lower, depending on the size of the region of interest, with a factor 1.0 on average (ranging from 0.7 up to a factor of 1.6). The average noise correlation between coil elements was 3% for the 256‐channel coil, and 5% for the 32‐channel coil. At acceptable g‐factors (< 2), the achievable acceleration factor using SENSE and 2D CAIPIRINHA was 24 and 28, respectively, versus 9 and 12 for the 32‐channel coil. CONCLUSION: The receive performance of the simulated 256 channel array was better than the 32‐channel reference. Combined with 2D CAIPIRINHA, a peak acceleration factor of 28 was assessed, showing great potential for high‐density receive arrays.