Cargando…
Long‐Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant
OBJECTIVE: To assess the audiological and long‐term medical and technical follow‐up outcomes of an active middle ear implant. METHODS: This was a retrospective medical chart analysis of all patients provided with an active middle ear implant in a tertiary academic medical referral center between Sep...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30284273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27513 |
_version_ | 1783428777151299584 |
---|---|
author | Brkic, Faris F. Riss, Dominik Auinger, Alice Zoerner, Barbara Arnoldner, Christoph Baumgartner, Wolf‐Dieter Gstoettner, Wolfgang Vyskocil, Erich |
author_facet | Brkic, Faris F. Riss, Dominik Auinger, Alice Zoerner, Barbara Arnoldner, Christoph Baumgartner, Wolf‐Dieter Gstoettner, Wolfgang Vyskocil, Erich |
author_sort | Brkic, Faris F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the audiological and long‐term medical and technical follow‐up outcomes of an active middle ear implant. METHODS: This was a retrospective medical chart analysis of all patients provided with an active middle ear implant in a tertiary academic medical referral center between September 1, 1998, and July 31, 2015. Main outcome measures were medical and technical complications, revisions, reimplantations, explantations, coupling approaches, mean time of use, pre‐ and postoperative hearing thresholds, functional hearing gain across frequencies (250–4,000 Hz), and Freiburg monosyllablic word test at 65 dB. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were identified. Fifteen were implanted bilaterally (n = 118 Vibrant Soundbridge devices [MED‐EL, Innsbruck, Austria]). Seventy‐seven devices were implanted for sensorineural and 41 for mixed and conductive hearing loss. Patients used the implant for 6.7 years (range 0.7 months–17.9 years) on average. Ninety‐one patients (77.12%) were using the device at the end of the observation period. An overall complication rate of 16.1% was observed. The revision and explantation rates were higher for devices implanted between 2004 and 2006. The device failure rate was 3.4%. Audiological evaluation showed significant hearing gains for both hearing loss patient groups. CONCLUSION: This long‐term follow‐up reveals the reliability of the active middle ear implant in a single center. Overall complication rate and device failure rate are acceptable. The complication rate was higher during implementation of alternative coupling approaches. The audiological benefit was satisfactory in patients with all hearing loss types. The majority of implanted patients used the implant at the end of the observation period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:477–481, 2019 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6585801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65858012019-06-27 Long‐Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant Brkic, Faris F. Riss, Dominik Auinger, Alice Zoerner, Barbara Arnoldner, Christoph Baumgartner, Wolf‐Dieter Gstoettner, Wolfgang Vyskocil, Erich Laryngoscope Otology/Neurotology OBJECTIVE: To assess the audiological and long‐term medical and technical follow‐up outcomes of an active middle ear implant. METHODS: This was a retrospective medical chart analysis of all patients provided with an active middle ear implant in a tertiary academic medical referral center between September 1, 1998, and July 31, 2015. Main outcome measures were medical and technical complications, revisions, reimplantations, explantations, coupling approaches, mean time of use, pre‐ and postoperative hearing thresholds, functional hearing gain across frequencies (250–4,000 Hz), and Freiburg monosyllablic word test at 65 dB. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were identified. Fifteen were implanted bilaterally (n = 118 Vibrant Soundbridge devices [MED‐EL, Innsbruck, Austria]). Seventy‐seven devices were implanted for sensorineural and 41 for mixed and conductive hearing loss. Patients used the implant for 6.7 years (range 0.7 months–17.9 years) on average. Ninety‐one patients (77.12%) were using the device at the end of the observation period. An overall complication rate of 16.1% was observed. The revision and explantation rates were higher for devices implanted between 2004 and 2006. The device failure rate was 3.4%. Audiological evaluation showed significant hearing gains for both hearing loss patient groups. CONCLUSION: This long‐term follow‐up reveals the reliability of the active middle ear implant in a single center. Overall complication rate and device failure rate are acceptable. The complication rate was higher during implementation of alternative coupling approaches. The audiological benefit was satisfactory in patients with all hearing loss types. The majority of implanted patients used the implant at the end of the observation period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:477–481, 2019 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-04 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6585801/ /pubmed/30284273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27513 Text en © 2018 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Otology/Neurotology Brkic, Faris F. Riss, Dominik Auinger, Alice Zoerner, Barbara Arnoldner, Christoph Baumgartner, Wolf‐Dieter Gstoettner, Wolfgang Vyskocil, Erich Long‐Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant |
title | Long‐Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant |
title_full | Long‐Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant |
title_fullStr | Long‐Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant |
title_full_unstemmed | Long‐Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant |
title_short | Long‐Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant |
title_sort | long‐term outcome of hearing rehabilitation with an active middle ear implant |
topic | Otology/Neurotology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30284273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brkicfarisf longtermoutcomeofhearingrehabilitationwithanactivemiddleearimplant AT rissdominik longtermoutcomeofhearingrehabilitationwithanactivemiddleearimplant AT auingeralice longtermoutcomeofhearingrehabilitationwithanactivemiddleearimplant AT zoernerbarbara longtermoutcomeofhearingrehabilitationwithanactivemiddleearimplant AT arnoldnerchristoph longtermoutcomeofhearingrehabilitationwithanactivemiddleearimplant AT baumgartnerwolfdieter longtermoutcomeofhearingrehabilitationwithanactivemiddleearimplant AT gstoettnerwolfgang longtermoutcomeofhearingrehabilitationwithanactivemiddleearimplant AT vyskocilerich longtermoutcomeofhearingrehabilitationwithanactivemiddleearimplant |