Cargando…

A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis

BACKGROUND: The most effective treatment modality for actinic keratosis (AK) is photodynamic therapy (PDT). Major obstacles of PDT are the need of a special illumination device and pain accompanying the illumination. These issues may be overcome by replacing an artificial high‐power light source wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dirschka, T., Ekanayake‐Bohlig, S., Dominicus, R., Aschoff, R., Herrera‐Ceballos, E., Botella‐Estrada, R., Hunfeld, A., Kremser, M., Schmitz, B., Lübbert, H., Puig, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30022544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15185
_version_ 1783428777836019712
author Dirschka, T.
Ekanayake‐Bohlig, S.
Dominicus, R.
Aschoff, R.
Herrera‐Ceballos, E.
Botella‐Estrada, R.
Hunfeld, A.
Kremser, M.
Schmitz, B.
Lübbert, H.
Puig, S.
author_facet Dirschka, T.
Ekanayake‐Bohlig, S.
Dominicus, R.
Aschoff, R.
Herrera‐Ceballos, E.
Botella‐Estrada, R.
Hunfeld, A.
Kremser, M.
Schmitz, B.
Lübbert, H.
Puig, S.
author_sort Dirschka, T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most effective treatment modality for actinic keratosis (AK) is photodynamic therapy (PDT). Major obstacles of PDT are the need of a special illumination device and pain accompanying the illumination. These issues may be overcome by replacing an artificial high‐power light source with natural daylight for more extended illumination at lower light doses. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether BF‐200 ALA (a nanoemulsion gel containing 7.8% 5‐aminolaevulinic acid) is non‐inferior to MAL (a cream containing 16% methyl‐aminolaevulinate) in the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate AK with daylight PDT (dPDT). Non‐inferiority of the primary efficacy variable (total lesion clearance rate per patient's side 12 weeks after PDT) is established if the mean response for BF‐200 ALA is no worse than for MAL, within a statistical margin of Δ = −12.5%. METHODS: The study was performed as an intraindividual comparison with 52 patients in seven centres in Germany and Spain. Each patient received one dPDT. Results include clinical endpoints as well as 1‐year follow‐up results. RESULTS: Twelve weeks after a single dPDT, 79.8% of the AK lesions treated with BF‐200 ALA gel and 76.5% of the lesions treated with MAL cream were completely cleared. The median of differences was 0.0 with a one‐sided 97.5% CI of 0.0, establishing non‐inferiority (P < 0.0001). Results for secondary efficacy parameters were in line with the primary outcome. Recurrence rates 1 year after the treatment were 19.9% for lesions treated with BF‐200 ALA and 31.6% for lesions treated with MAL. Adverse reactions including pain were mostly mild and transient and identical to those previously described for dPDT. CONCLUSION: Daylight PDT of AK with BF‐200 ALA is well‐tolerated and non‐inferior to MAL/dPDT. The study demonstrates a trend towards higher efficacies after 3 months and significantly lower recurrence rates after 1 year follow‐up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6585804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65858042019-06-27 A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis Dirschka, T. Ekanayake‐Bohlig, S. Dominicus, R. Aschoff, R. Herrera‐Ceballos, E. Botella‐Estrada, R. Hunfeld, A. Kremser, M. Schmitz, B. Lübbert, H. Puig, S. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology BACKGROUND: The most effective treatment modality for actinic keratosis (AK) is photodynamic therapy (PDT). Major obstacles of PDT are the need of a special illumination device and pain accompanying the illumination. These issues may be overcome by replacing an artificial high‐power light source with natural daylight for more extended illumination at lower light doses. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether BF‐200 ALA (a nanoemulsion gel containing 7.8% 5‐aminolaevulinic acid) is non‐inferior to MAL (a cream containing 16% methyl‐aminolaevulinate) in the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate AK with daylight PDT (dPDT). Non‐inferiority of the primary efficacy variable (total lesion clearance rate per patient's side 12 weeks after PDT) is established if the mean response for BF‐200 ALA is no worse than for MAL, within a statistical margin of Δ = −12.5%. METHODS: The study was performed as an intraindividual comparison with 52 patients in seven centres in Germany and Spain. Each patient received one dPDT. Results include clinical endpoints as well as 1‐year follow‐up results. RESULTS: Twelve weeks after a single dPDT, 79.8% of the AK lesions treated with BF‐200 ALA gel and 76.5% of the lesions treated with MAL cream were completely cleared. The median of differences was 0.0 with a one‐sided 97.5% CI of 0.0, establishing non‐inferiority (P < 0.0001). Results for secondary efficacy parameters were in line with the primary outcome. Recurrence rates 1 year after the treatment were 19.9% for lesions treated with BF‐200 ALA and 31.6% for lesions treated with MAL. Adverse reactions including pain were mostly mild and transient and identical to those previously described for dPDT. CONCLUSION: Daylight PDT of AK with BF‐200 ALA is well‐tolerated and non‐inferior to MAL/dPDT. The study demonstrates a trend towards higher efficacies after 3 months and significantly lower recurrence rates after 1 year follow‐up. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-14 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6585804/ /pubmed/30022544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15185 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology
Dirschka, T.
Ekanayake‐Bohlig, S.
Dominicus, R.
Aschoff, R.
Herrera‐Ceballos, E.
Botella‐Estrada, R.
Hunfeld, A.
Kremser, M.
Schmitz, B.
Lübbert, H.
Puig, S.
A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis
title A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis
title_full A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis
title_fullStr A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis
title_short A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis
title_sort randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, phase iii study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with bf‐200 ala gel and mal cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis
topic Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30022544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15185
work_keys_str_mv AT dirschkat arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT ekanayakebohligs arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT dominicusr arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT aschoffr arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT herreraceballose arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT botellaestradar arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT hunfelda arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT kremserm arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT schmitzb arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT lubberth arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT puigs arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT dirschkat randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT ekanayakebohligs randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT dominicusr randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT aschoffr randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT herreraceballose randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT botellaestradar randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT hunfelda randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT kremserm randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT schmitzb randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT lubberth randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT puigs randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis