Cargando…
A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis
BACKGROUND: The most effective treatment modality for actinic keratosis (AK) is photodynamic therapy (PDT). Major obstacles of PDT are the need of a special illumination device and pain accompanying the illumination. These issues may be overcome by replacing an artificial high‐power light source wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30022544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15185 |
_version_ | 1783428777836019712 |
---|---|
author | Dirschka, T. Ekanayake‐Bohlig, S. Dominicus, R. Aschoff, R. Herrera‐Ceballos, E. Botella‐Estrada, R. Hunfeld, A. Kremser, M. Schmitz, B. Lübbert, H. Puig, S. |
author_facet | Dirschka, T. Ekanayake‐Bohlig, S. Dominicus, R. Aschoff, R. Herrera‐Ceballos, E. Botella‐Estrada, R. Hunfeld, A. Kremser, M. Schmitz, B. Lübbert, H. Puig, S. |
author_sort | Dirschka, T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The most effective treatment modality for actinic keratosis (AK) is photodynamic therapy (PDT). Major obstacles of PDT are the need of a special illumination device and pain accompanying the illumination. These issues may be overcome by replacing an artificial high‐power light source with natural daylight for more extended illumination at lower light doses. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether BF‐200 ALA (a nanoemulsion gel containing 7.8% 5‐aminolaevulinic acid) is non‐inferior to MAL (a cream containing 16% methyl‐aminolaevulinate) in the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate AK with daylight PDT (dPDT). Non‐inferiority of the primary efficacy variable (total lesion clearance rate per patient's side 12 weeks after PDT) is established if the mean response for BF‐200 ALA is no worse than for MAL, within a statistical margin of Δ = −12.5%. METHODS: The study was performed as an intraindividual comparison with 52 patients in seven centres in Germany and Spain. Each patient received one dPDT. Results include clinical endpoints as well as 1‐year follow‐up results. RESULTS: Twelve weeks after a single dPDT, 79.8% of the AK lesions treated with BF‐200 ALA gel and 76.5% of the lesions treated with MAL cream were completely cleared. The median of differences was 0.0 with a one‐sided 97.5% CI of 0.0, establishing non‐inferiority (P < 0.0001). Results for secondary efficacy parameters were in line with the primary outcome. Recurrence rates 1 year after the treatment were 19.9% for lesions treated with BF‐200 ALA and 31.6% for lesions treated with MAL. Adverse reactions including pain were mostly mild and transient and identical to those previously described for dPDT. CONCLUSION: Daylight PDT of AK with BF‐200 ALA is well‐tolerated and non‐inferior to MAL/dPDT. The study demonstrates a trend towards higher efficacies after 3 months and significantly lower recurrence rates after 1 year follow‐up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6585804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65858042019-06-27 A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis Dirschka, T. Ekanayake‐Bohlig, S. Dominicus, R. Aschoff, R. Herrera‐Ceballos, E. Botella‐Estrada, R. Hunfeld, A. Kremser, M. Schmitz, B. Lübbert, H. Puig, S. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology BACKGROUND: The most effective treatment modality for actinic keratosis (AK) is photodynamic therapy (PDT). Major obstacles of PDT are the need of a special illumination device and pain accompanying the illumination. These issues may be overcome by replacing an artificial high‐power light source with natural daylight for more extended illumination at lower light doses. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether BF‐200 ALA (a nanoemulsion gel containing 7.8% 5‐aminolaevulinic acid) is non‐inferior to MAL (a cream containing 16% methyl‐aminolaevulinate) in the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate AK with daylight PDT (dPDT). Non‐inferiority of the primary efficacy variable (total lesion clearance rate per patient's side 12 weeks after PDT) is established if the mean response for BF‐200 ALA is no worse than for MAL, within a statistical margin of Δ = −12.5%. METHODS: The study was performed as an intraindividual comparison with 52 patients in seven centres in Germany and Spain. Each patient received one dPDT. Results include clinical endpoints as well as 1‐year follow‐up results. RESULTS: Twelve weeks after a single dPDT, 79.8% of the AK lesions treated with BF‐200 ALA gel and 76.5% of the lesions treated with MAL cream were completely cleared. The median of differences was 0.0 with a one‐sided 97.5% CI of 0.0, establishing non‐inferiority (P < 0.0001). Results for secondary efficacy parameters were in line with the primary outcome. Recurrence rates 1 year after the treatment were 19.9% for lesions treated with BF‐200 ALA and 31.6% for lesions treated with MAL. Adverse reactions including pain were mostly mild and transient and identical to those previously described for dPDT. CONCLUSION: Daylight PDT of AK with BF‐200 ALA is well‐tolerated and non‐inferior to MAL/dPDT. The study demonstrates a trend towards higher efficacies after 3 months and significantly lower recurrence rates after 1 year follow‐up. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-14 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6585804/ /pubmed/30022544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15185 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology Dirschka, T. Ekanayake‐Bohlig, S. Dominicus, R. Aschoff, R. Herrera‐Ceballos, E. Botella‐Estrada, R. Hunfeld, A. Kremser, M. Schmitz, B. Lübbert, H. Puig, S. A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis |
title | A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis |
title_full | A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis |
title_fullStr | A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis |
title_short | A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, Phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis |
title_sort | randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, phase iii study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with bf‐200 ala gel and mal cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis |
topic | Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30022544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dirschkat arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT ekanayakebohligs arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT dominicusr arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT aschoffr arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT herreraceballose arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT botellaestradar arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT hunfelda arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT kremserm arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT schmitzb arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT lubberth arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT puigs arandomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT dirschkat randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT ekanayakebohligs randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT dominicusr randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT aschoffr randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT herreraceballose randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT botellaestradar randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT hunfelda randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT kremserm randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT schmitzb randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT lubberth randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis AT puigs randomizedintraindividualnoninferiorityphaseiiistudycomparingdaylightphotodynamictherapywithbf200alagelandmalcreamforthetreatmentofactinickeratosis |