Cargando…

Effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus comparators on renal endpoints in the real world: A multicentre retrospective study

AIM: To evaluate the changes in renal endpoints in type 2 diabetes patients treated with dapagliflozin versus other glucose‐lowering medications in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DARWIN‐T2D was a retrospective study conducted at 46 outpatient diabetes clinics in Italy. An automate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fadini, Gian Paolo, Solini, Anna, Manca, Maria Laura, Penno, Giuseppe, Gatti, Adriano, Anichini, Roberto, Del Prato, Stefano, Avogaro, Angelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30136354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13508
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To evaluate the changes in renal endpoints in type 2 diabetes patients treated with dapagliflozin versus other glucose‐lowering medications in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DARWIN‐T2D was a retrospective study conducted at 46 outpatient diabetes clinics in Italy. An automated software collected data on 17 285 patients who received dapagliflozin, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, or gliclazide, 6751 of whom had a follow‐up visit. We analysed changes in albumin excretion rate (AER) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RESULTS: Patients who received dapagliflozin (n = 473) were younger, more obese, and had a poorer glucose control than those who received a comparator (n = 2973). After ~6 months, median (interquartile range) AER declined by 37%, from 19.5 (7.5–78.2) to 13.2 (6.5–45.0) mg/g (P < 0.0001) in the dapagliflozin group and did not change in the comparator group. After adjusting for confounders, therapy with dapagliflozin versus comparators was associated with an AER reduction of 26.4 ± 13.1 mg/g (P = 0.045), and eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m(2)) diminished by 1.1 ± 0.5 (P = 0.049) in the dapagliflozin group and by 0.6 ± 9.1 (P = 0.002) in the comparator group (P = 0.35 between groups). No patient treated with dapagliflozin versus four patients treated with comparators experienced a doubling of serum creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: The antiproteinuric effect of dapagliflozin is confirmed here for the first time by real‐world data. Despite a mild decline in eGFR, there was no evidence of clinically relevant worsening in renal function.