Cargando…

Assessment of patients’ expectations: development and validation of the Expectation for Treatment Scale (ETS)

OBJECTIVE: To develop a short self-report instrument for the assessment of expectations (Expectation for Treatment Scale(ETS)) using acupuncture as a case example. DESIGN: A cross-sectional assessment with retest after 1 week. SETTING: A web-based survey with patients suffering from pain. METHODS: I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barth, Jürgen, Kern, Alexandra, Lüthi, Sebastian, Witt, Claudia M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31213446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026712
_version_ 1783428783213117440
author Barth, Jürgen
Kern, Alexandra
Lüthi, Sebastian
Witt, Claudia M
author_facet Barth, Jürgen
Kern, Alexandra
Lüthi, Sebastian
Witt, Claudia M
author_sort Barth, Jürgen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop a short self-report instrument for the assessment of expectations (Expectation for Treatment Scale(ETS)) using acupuncture as a case example. DESIGN: A cross-sectional assessment with retest after 1 week. SETTING: A web-based survey with patients suffering from pain. METHODS: In a three-step approach, we reduced the initially collected number of items from 17 to 9 and to 5, including expectations about coping ability, vitality, physical health and reduction of patient complaints. Items were selected according to internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha); convergent and divergent validities with related constructs (optimism, pessimism, resilience, perceived sensitivity to medicines, depression and others); 1-week retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)); and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: A total of 102 patients suffering from pain were included, and 54 of these patients completed the retest assessment. The final version of the ETS consisted of five items and had an excellent Cronbach’s alpha (0.90), with 72.33% variance on one single factor. Depression, pessimism and perceived sensitivity to medicines showed positive correlations with our expectation measure (r=0.23, r=0.20 and r=0.34, respectively); the correlation between the ETS and optimism was low (r=−0.07) and no correlation between the ETS and resilience was found (r=−0.07). Convergent validity was confirmed with a high correlation (r>0.90) between ETS and a treatment-specific measure of expectations. The retest ICC was 0.86, which showed high stability over 1 week. A CFA (n=439) with data from patients with low back pain confirmed the single-factor structure of the instrument. CONCLUSION: The ETS showed strong psychometric properties and covered a distinct construct. As the next step, the ETS might be implemented in different clinical conditions and settings to investigate psychometrics and its predictive power for treatment outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6585827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65858272019-07-05 Assessment of patients’ expectations: development and validation of the Expectation for Treatment Scale (ETS) Barth, Jürgen Kern, Alexandra Lüthi, Sebastian Witt, Claudia M BMJ Open Complementary Medicine OBJECTIVE: To develop a short self-report instrument for the assessment of expectations (Expectation for Treatment Scale(ETS)) using acupuncture as a case example. DESIGN: A cross-sectional assessment with retest after 1 week. SETTING: A web-based survey with patients suffering from pain. METHODS: In a three-step approach, we reduced the initially collected number of items from 17 to 9 and to 5, including expectations about coping ability, vitality, physical health and reduction of patient complaints. Items were selected according to internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha); convergent and divergent validities with related constructs (optimism, pessimism, resilience, perceived sensitivity to medicines, depression and others); 1-week retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)); and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: A total of 102 patients suffering from pain were included, and 54 of these patients completed the retest assessment. The final version of the ETS consisted of five items and had an excellent Cronbach’s alpha (0.90), with 72.33% variance on one single factor. Depression, pessimism and perceived sensitivity to medicines showed positive correlations with our expectation measure (r=0.23, r=0.20 and r=0.34, respectively); the correlation between the ETS and optimism was low (r=−0.07) and no correlation between the ETS and resilience was found (r=−0.07). Convergent validity was confirmed with a high correlation (r>0.90) between ETS and a treatment-specific measure of expectations. The retest ICC was 0.86, which showed high stability over 1 week. A CFA (n=439) with data from patients with low back pain confirmed the single-factor structure of the instrument. CONCLUSION: The ETS showed strong psychometric properties and covered a distinct construct. As the next step, the ETS might be implemented in different clinical conditions and settings to investigate psychometrics and its predictive power for treatment outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6585827/ /pubmed/31213446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026712 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Complementary Medicine
Barth, Jürgen
Kern, Alexandra
Lüthi, Sebastian
Witt, Claudia M
Assessment of patients’ expectations: development and validation of the Expectation for Treatment Scale (ETS)
title Assessment of patients’ expectations: development and validation of the Expectation for Treatment Scale (ETS)
title_full Assessment of patients’ expectations: development and validation of the Expectation for Treatment Scale (ETS)
title_fullStr Assessment of patients’ expectations: development and validation of the Expectation for Treatment Scale (ETS)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of patients’ expectations: development and validation of the Expectation for Treatment Scale (ETS)
title_short Assessment of patients’ expectations: development and validation of the Expectation for Treatment Scale (ETS)
title_sort assessment of patients’ expectations: development and validation of the expectation for treatment scale (ets)
topic Complementary Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31213446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026712
work_keys_str_mv AT barthjurgen assessmentofpatientsexpectationsdevelopmentandvalidationoftheexpectationfortreatmentscaleets
AT kernalexandra assessmentofpatientsexpectationsdevelopmentandvalidationoftheexpectationfortreatmentscaleets
AT luthisebastian assessmentofpatientsexpectationsdevelopmentandvalidationoftheexpectationfortreatmentscaleets
AT wittclaudiam assessmentofpatientsexpectationsdevelopmentandvalidationoftheexpectationfortreatmentscaleets