Cargando…
Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this exploratory study was to see how the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) may impact the daily clinical practice of sleep centres, and why it may or may not work as expected. The hypotheses were tested that this patient-reported outcome measure makes patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31203238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025963 |
_version_ | 1783428783675539456 |
---|---|
author | Abma, Inger L Rovers, Maroeska M IJff, Marijke Hol, Bernard Nägele, Masha Westert, Gert P van der Wees, Philip J |
author_facet | Abma, Inger L Rovers, Maroeska M IJff, Marijke Hol, Bernard Nägele, Masha Westert, Gert P van der Wees, Philip J |
author_sort | Abma, Inger L |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objective of this exploratory study was to see how the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) may impact the daily clinical practice of sleep centres, and why it may or may not work as expected. The hypotheses were tested that this patient-reported outcome measure makes patients more aware of which of their health complaints may be related to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and that it improves patient-centredness of care by shifting the focus of care away from (only) medical problems towards the individual burden of disease and quality of life. DESIGN: Mixed methods. The quantitative study (surveys, patient records) was a before-and-after study. SETTING: Three sleep centres in The Netherlands (secondary care). PARTICIPANTS: 27 patients and 14 healthcare professionals were interviewed. 487 patients completed surveys pre-implementation, and 377 patients completed surveys post-implementation of the PRAQ. For the health records, 125 patients were included in the pre-implementation group, and 124 other patients in the post-implementation group. INTERVENTIONS: The PRAQ was used in clinical practice for six successive months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on individual survey items, number of patients receiving non-medical treatment, adjustment of treatment at first follow-up, compliance with treatment. RESULTS: Patients were generally positive about the usefulness of the PRAQ before and during the consultation, as they felt more informed. Healthcare providers did not consider the PRAQ very useful, and they reported minor impact on their consultations. The surveys and health record study did not show an impact of the PRAQ on clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing the PRAQ may be beneficial to patients, but this study does not show much impact with regard to patient-centredness of care. New Dutch guidelines for OSA care may lead to a greater emphasis on quality of life and value of care for patients, making its integration in clinical care potentially more useful. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6585829 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65858292019-07-05 Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study Abma, Inger L Rovers, Maroeska M IJff, Marijke Hol, Bernard Nägele, Masha Westert, Gert P van der Wees, Philip J BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: The objective of this exploratory study was to see how the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) may impact the daily clinical practice of sleep centres, and why it may or may not work as expected. The hypotheses were tested that this patient-reported outcome measure makes patients more aware of which of their health complaints may be related to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and that it improves patient-centredness of care by shifting the focus of care away from (only) medical problems towards the individual burden of disease and quality of life. DESIGN: Mixed methods. The quantitative study (surveys, patient records) was a before-and-after study. SETTING: Three sleep centres in The Netherlands (secondary care). PARTICIPANTS: 27 patients and 14 healthcare professionals were interviewed. 487 patients completed surveys pre-implementation, and 377 patients completed surveys post-implementation of the PRAQ. For the health records, 125 patients were included in the pre-implementation group, and 124 other patients in the post-implementation group. INTERVENTIONS: The PRAQ was used in clinical practice for six successive months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on individual survey items, number of patients receiving non-medical treatment, adjustment of treatment at first follow-up, compliance with treatment. RESULTS: Patients were generally positive about the usefulness of the PRAQ before and during the consultation, as they felt more informed. Healthcare providers did not consider the PRAQ very useful, and they reported minor impact on their consultations. The surveys and health record study did not show an impact of the PRAQ on clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing the PRAQ may be beneficial to patients, but this study does not show much impact with regard to patient-centredness of care. New Dutch guidelines for OSA care may lead to a greater emphasis on quality of life and value of care for patients, making its integration in clinical care potentially more useful. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6585829/ /pubmed/31203238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025963 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Abma, Inger L Rovers, Maroeska M IJff, Marijke Hol, Bernard Nägele, Masha Westert, Gert P van der Wees, Philip J Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study |
title | Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study |
title_full | Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study |
title_short | Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study |
title_sort | does the patient-reported apnea questionnaire (praq) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31203238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025963 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abmaingerl doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy AT roversmaroeskam doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy AT ijffmarijke doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy AT holbernard doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy AT nagelemasha doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy AT westertgertp doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy AT vanderweesphilipj doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy |