Cargando…

Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this exploratory study was to see how the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) may impact the daily clinical practice of sleep centres, and why it may or may not work as expected. The hypotheses were tested that this patient-reported outcome measure makes patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abma, Inger L, Rovers, Maroeska M, IJff, Marijke, Hol, Bernard, Nägele, Masha, Westert, Gert P, van der Wees, Philip J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31203238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025963
_version_ 1783428783675539456
author Abma, Inger L
Rovers, Maroeska M
IJff, Marijke
Hol, Bernard
Nägele, Masha
Westert, Gert P
van der Wees, Philip J
author_facet Abma, Inger L
Rovers, Maroeska M
IJff, Marijke
Hol, Bernard
Nägele, Masha
Westert, Gert P
van der Wees, Philip J
author_sort Abma, Inger L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this exploratory study was to see how the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) may impact the daily clinical practice of sleep centres, and why it may or may not work as expected. The hypotheses were tested that this patient-reported outcome measure makes patients more aware of which of their health complaints may be related to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and that it improves patient-centredness of care by shifting the focus of care away from (only) medical problems towards the individual burden of disease and quality of life. DESIGN: Mixed methods. The quantitative study (surveys, patient records) was a before-and-after study. SETTING: Three sleep centres in The Netherlands (secondary care). PARTICIPANTS: 27 patients and 14 healthcare professionals were interviewed. 487 patients completed surveys pre-implementation, and 377 patients completed surveys post-implementation of the PRAQ. For the health records, 125 patients were included in the pre-implementation group, and 124 other patients in the post-implementation group. INTERVENTIONS: The PRAQ was used in clinical practice for six successive months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on individual survey items, number of patients receiving non-medical treatment, adjustment of treatment at first follow-up, compliance with treatment. RESULTS: Patients were generally positive about the usefulness of the PRAQ before and during the consultation, as they felt more informed. Healthcare providers did not consider the PRAQ very useful, and they reported minor impact on their consultations. The surveys and health record study did not show an impact of the PRAQ on clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing the PRAQ may be beneficial to patients, but this study does not show much impact with regard to patient-centredness of care. New Dutch guidelines for OSA care may lead to a greater emphasis on quality of life and value of care for patients, making its integration in clinical care potentially more useful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6585829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65858292019-07-05 Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study Abma, Inger L Rovers, Maroeska M IJff, Marijke Hol, Bernard Nägele, Masha Westert, Gert P van der Wees, Philip J BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: The objective of this exploratory study was to see how the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) may impact the daily clinical practice of sleep centres, and why it may or may not work as expected. The hypotheses were tested that this patient-reported outcome measure makes patients more aware of which of their health complaints may be related to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and that it improves patient-centredness of care by shifting the focus of care away from (only) medical problems towards the individual burden of disease and quality of life. DESIGN: Mixed methods. The quantitative study (surveys, patient records) was a before-and-after study. SETTING: Three sleep centres in The Netherlands (secondary care). PARTICIPANTS: 27 patients and 14 healthcare professionals were interviewed. 487 patients completed surveys pre-implementation, and 377 patients completed surveys post-implementation of the PRAQ. For the health records, 125 patients were included in the pre-implementation group, and 124 other patients in the post-implementation group. INTERVENTIONS: The PRAQ was used in clinical practice for six successive months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on individual survey items, number of patients receiving non-medical treatment, adjustment of treatment at first follow-up, compliance with treatment. RESULTS: Patients were generally positive about the usefulness of the PRAQ before and during the consultation, as they felt more informed. Healthcare providers did not consider the PRAQ very useful, and they reported minor impact on their consultations. The surveys and health record study did not show an impact of the PRAQ on clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing the PRAQ may be beneficial to patients, but this study does not show much impact with regard to patient-centredness of care. New Dutch guidelines for OSA care may lead to a greater emphasis on quality of life and value of care for patients, making its integration in clinical care potentially more useful. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6585829/ /pubmed/31203238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025963 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Abma, Inger L
Rovers, Maroeska M
IJff, Marijke
Hol, Bernard
Nägele, Masha
Westert, Gert P
van der Wees, Philip J
Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study
title Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study
title_full Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study
title_short Does the Patient-Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study
title_sort does the patient-reported apnea questionnaire (praq) increase patient-centredness in the daily practice of sleep centres? a mixed-methods study
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31203238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025963
work_keys_str_mv AT abmaingerl doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy
AT roversmaroeskam doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy
AT ijffmarijke doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy
AT holbernard doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy
AT nagelemasha doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy
AT westertgertp doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy
AT vanderweesphilipj doesthepatientreportedapneaquestionnairepraqincreasepatientcentrednessinthedailypracticeofsleepcentresamixedmethodsstudy