Cargando…
How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring
For using counts of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the clinic to aid a physician's decision, its reported values will need to be accurate and comparable between institutions. Many technologies have become available to enumerate and characterize CTCs, thereby showing a large range of reported...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23576 |
_version_ | 1783428789099823104 |
---|---|
author | Zeune, Leonie L. de Wit, Sanne Berghuis, A.M. Sofie IJzerman, Maarten J. Terstappen, Leon W.M.M. Brune, Christoph |
author_facet | Zeune, Leonie L. de Wit, Sanne Berghuis, A.M. Sofie IJzerman, Maarten J. Terstappen, Leon W.M.M. Brune, Christoph |
author_sort | Zeune, Leonie L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | For using counts of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the clinic to aid a physician's decision, its reported values will need to be accurate and comparable between institutions. Many technologies have become available to enumerate and characterize CTCs, thereby showing a large range of reported values. Here we introduce an Open Source CTC scoring tool to enable comparison of different reviewers and facilitate the reach of a consensus on assigning objects as CTCs. One hundred images generated from two different platforms were used to assess concordance between 15 reviewers and an expert panel. Large differences were observed between reviewers in assigning objects as CTCs urging the need for computer recognition of CTCs. A demonstration of a deep learning approach on the 100 images showed the promise of this technique for future CTC enumeration. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6585854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65858542019-06-27 How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring Zeune, Leonie L. de Wit, Sanne Berghuis, A.M. Sofie IJzerman, Maarten J. Terstappen, Leon W.M.M. Brune, Christoph Cytometry A CTC Technologies and Tools For using counts of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the clinic to aid a physician's decision, its reported values will need to be accurate and comparable between institutions. Many technologies have become available to enumerate and characterize CTCs, thereby showing a large range of reported values. Here we introduce an Open Source CTC scoring tool to enable comparison of different reviewers and facilitate the reach of a consensus on assigning objects as CTCs. One hundred images generated from two different platforms were used to assess concordance between 15 reviewers and an expert panel. Large differences were observed between reviewers in assigning objects as CTCs urging the need for computer recognition of CTCs. A demonstration of a deep learning approach on the 100 images showed the promise of this technique for future CTC enumeration. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018-09-24 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6585854/ /pubmed/30246927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23576 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | CTC Technologies and Tools Zeune, Leonie L. de Wit, Sanne Berghuis, A.M. Sofie IJzerman, Maarten J. Terstappen, Leon W.M.M. Brune, Christoph How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring |
title | How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring |
title_full | How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring |
title_fullStr | How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring |
title_short | How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring |
title_sort | how to agree on a ctc: evaluating the consensus in circulating tumor cell scoring |
topic | CTC Technologies and Tools |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23576 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zeuneleoniel howtoagreeonactcevaluatingtheconsensusincirculatingtumorcellscoring AT dewitsanne howtoagreeonactcevaluatingtheconsensusincirculatingtumorcellscoring AT berghuisamsofie howtoagreeonactcevaluatingtheconsensusincirculatingtumorcellscoring AT ijzermanmaartenj howtoagreeonactcevaluatingtheconsensusincirculatingtumorcellscoring AT terstappenleonwmm howtoagreeonactcevaluatingtheconsensusincirculatingtumorcellscoring AT brunechristoph howtoagreeonactcevaluatingtheconsensusincirculatingtumorcellscoring |