Cargando…

How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring

For using counts of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the clinic to aid a physician's decision, its reported values will need to be accurate and comparable between institutions. Many technologies have become available to enumerate and characterize CTCs, thereby showing a large range of reported...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeune, Leonie L., de Wit, Sanne, Berghuis, A.M. Sofie, IJzerman, Maarten J., Terstappen, Leon W.M.M., Brune, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23576
_version_ 1783428789099823104
author Zeune, Leonie L.
de Wit, Sanne
Berghuis, A.M. Sofie
IJzerman, Maarten J.
Terstappen, Leon W.M.M.
Brune, Christoph
author_facet Zeune, Leonie L.
de Wit, Sanne
Berghuis, A.M. Sofie
IJzerman, Maarten J.
Terstappen, Leon W.M.M.
Brune, Christoph
author_sort Zeune, Leonie L.
collection PubMed
description For using counts of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the clinic to aid a physician's decision, its reported values will need to be accurate and comparable between institutions. Many technologies have become available to enumerate and characterize CTCs, thereby showing a large range of reported values. Here we introduce an Open Source CTC scoring tool to enable comparison of different reviewers and facilitate the reach of a consensus on assigning objects as CTCs. One hundred images generated from two different platforms were used to assess concordance between 15 reviewers and an expert panel. Large differences were observed between reviewers in assigning objects as CTCs urging the need for computer recognition of CTCs. A demonstration of a deep learning approach on the 100 images showed the promise of this technique for future CTC enumeration. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6585854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65858542019-06-27 How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring Zeune, Leonie L. de Wit, Sanne Berghuis, A.M. Sofie IJzerman, Maarten J. Terstappen, Leon W.M.M. Brune, Christoph Cytometry A CTC Technologies and Tools For using counts of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the clinic to aid a physician's decision, its reported values will need to be accurate and comparable between institutions. Many technologies have become available to enumerate and characterize CTCs, thereby showing a large range of reported values. Here we introduce an Open Source CTC scoring tool to enable comparison of different reviewers and facilitate the reach of a consensus on assigning objects as CTCs. One hundred images generated from two different platforms were used to assess concordance between 15 reviewers and an expert panel. Large differences were observed between reviewers in assigning objects as CTCs urging the need for computer recognition of CTCs. A demonstration of a deep learning approach on the 100 images showed the promise of this technique for future CTC enumeration. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018-09-24 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6585854/ /pubmed/30246927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23576 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle CTC Technologies and Tools
Zeune, Leonie L.
de Wit, Sanne
Berghuis, A.M. Sofie
IJzerman, Maarten J.
Terstappen, Leon W.M.M.
Brune, Christoph
How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring
title How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring
title_full How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring
title_fullStr How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring
title_full_unstemmed How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring
title_short How to Agree on a CTC: Evaluating the Consensus in Circulating Tumor Cell Scoring
title_sort how to agree on a ctc: evaluating the consensus in circulating tumor cell scoring
topic CTC Technologies and Tools
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23576
work_keys_str_mv AT zeuneleoniel howtoagreeonactcevaluatingtheconsensusincirculatingtumorcellscoring
AT dewitsanne howtoagreeonactcevaluatingtheconsensusincirculatingtumorcellscoring
AT berghuisamsofie howtoagreeonactcevaluatingtheconsensusincirculatingtumorcellscoring
AT ijzermanmaartenj howtoagreeonactcevaluatingtheconsensusincirculatingtumorcellscoring
AT terstappenleonwmm howtoagreeonactcevaluatingtheconsensusincirculatingtumorcellscoring
AT brunechristoph howtoagreeonactcevaluatingtheconsensusincirculatingtumorcellscoring