Cargando…
Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
PURPOSE: To create a checklist to evaluate the performance and systematize the gastroenterostomy simulated training. METHODS: Experimental longitudinal study of a quantitative character. The sample consisted of twelve general surgery residents. The training was divided into 5 sessions and consisted...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em
Cirurgia
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30892394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190030000008 |
_version_ | 1783428797648863232 |
---|---|
author | Barreira, Márcio Alencar Siveira, Delano Gurgel Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima de Moura, Luiz Gonzaga de Mesquita, Charles Jean Gomes Borges, Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira |
author_facet | Barreira, Márcio Alencar Siveira, Delano Gurgel Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima de Moura, Luiz Gonzaga de Mesquita, Charles Jean Gomes Borges, Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira |
author_sort | Barreira, Márcio Alencar |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To create a checklist to evaluate the performance and systematize the gastroenterostomy simulated training. METHODS: Experimental longitudinal study of a quantitative character. The sample consisted of twelve general surgery residents. The training was divided into 5 sessions and consisted of participation in 20 gastroenterostomys in synthetic organs. The training was accompanied by an experienced surgeon who was responsible for the feedback and the anastomoses evaluation. The anastomoses evaluated were the first, fourth, sixth, eighth and tenth. A 10 item checklist and the time to evaluate performance were used. RESULTS: Residents showed a reduction in operative time and evolution in the surgical technique statistically significant (p<0.01). The correlation index of 0.545 and 0,295 showed a high linear correlation between time variables and Checklist. The average Checklist score went from 6.8 to 9 points. CONCLUSION: The proposed checklist can be used to evaluate the performance and systematization of a simulated training aimed at configuring a gastroenterostomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6585891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em
Cirurgia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65858912019-07-02 Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training Barreira, Márcio Alencar Siveira, Delano Gurgel Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima de Moura, Luiz Gonzaga de Mesquita, Charles Jean Gomes Borges, Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira Acta Cir Bras ORIGINAL ARTICLE PURPOSE: To create a checklist to evaluate the performance and systematize the gastroenterostomy simulated training. METHODS: Experimental longitudinal study of a quantitative character. The sample consisted of twelve general surgery residents. The training was divided into 5 sessions and consisted of participation in 20 gastroenterostomys in synthetic organs. The training was accompanied by an experienced surgeon who was responsible for the feedback and the anastomoses evaluation. The anastomoses evaluated were the first, fourth, sixth, eighth and tenth. A 10 item checklist and the time to evaluate performance were used. RESULTS: Residents showed a reduction in operative time and evolution in the surgical technique statistically significant (p<0.01). The correlation index of 0.545 and 0,295 showed a high linear correlation between time variables and Checklist. The average Checklist score went from 6.8 to 9 points. CONCLUSION: The proposed checklist can be used to evaluate the performance and systematization of a simulated training aimed at configuring a gastroenterostomy. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6585891/ /pubmed/30892394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190030000008 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL ARTICLE Barreira, Márcio Alencar Siveira, Delano Gurgel Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima de Moura, Luiz Gonzaga de Mesquita, Charles Jean Gomes Borges, Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training |
title | Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
|
title_full | Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
|
title_fullStr | Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
|
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
|
title_short | Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
|
title_sort | evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training |
topic | ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30892394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190030000008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barreiramarcioalencar evaluationtoolforagastroenterostomysimulatedtraining AT siveiradelanogurgel evaluationtoolforagastroenterostomysimulatedtraining AT rochahermanoalexandrelima evaluationtoolforagastroenterostomysimulatedtraining AT demouraluizgonzaga evaluationtoolforagastroenterostomysimulatedtraining AT demesquitacharlesjeangomes evaluationtoolforagastroenterostomysimulatedtraining AT borgesgleydsoncesardeoliveira evaluationtoolforagastroenterostomysimulatedtraining |