Cargando…

Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training

PURPOSE: To create a checklist to evaluate the performance and systematize the gastroenterostomy simulated training. METHODS: Experimental longitudinal study of a quantitative character. The sample consisted of twelve general surgery residents. The training was divided into 5 sessions and consisted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barreira, Márcio Alencar, Siveira, Delano Gurgel, Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima, de Moura, Luiz Gonzaga, de Mesquita, Charles Jean Gomes, Borges, Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30892394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190030000008
_version_ 1783428797648863232
author Barreira, Márcio Alencar
Siveira, Delano Gurgel
Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima
de Moura, Luiz Gonzaga
de Mesquita, Charles Jean Gomes
Borges, Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira
author_facet Barreira, Márcio Alencar
Siveira, Delano Gurgel
Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima
de Moura, Luiz Gonzaga
de Mesquita, Charles Jean Gomes
Borges, Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira
author_sort Barreira, Márcio Alencar
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To create a checklist to evaluate the performance and systematize the gastroenterostomy simulated training. METHODS: Experimental longitudinal study of a quantitative character. The sample consisted of twelve general surgery residents. The training was divided into 5 sessions and consisted of participation in 20 gastroenterostomys in synthetic organs. The training was accompanied by an experienced surgeon who was responsible for the feedback and the anastomoses evaluation. The anastomoses evaluated were the first, fourth, sixth, eighth and tenth. A 10 item checklist and the time to evaluate performance were used. RESULTS: Residents showed a reduction in operative time and evolution in the surgical technique statistically significant (p<0.01). The correlation index of 0.545 and 0,295 showed a high linear correlation between time variables and Checklist. The average Checklist score went from 6.8 to 9 points. CONCLUSION: The proposed checklist can be used to evaluate the performance and systematization of a simulated training aimed at configuring a gastroenterostomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6585891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65858912019-07-02 Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training Barreira, Márcio Alencar Siveira, Delano Gurgel Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima de Moura, Luiz Gonzaga de Mesquita, Charles Jean Gomes Borges, Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira Acta Cir Bras ORIGINAL ARTICLE PURPOSE: To create a checklist to evaluate the performance and systematize the gastroenterostomy simulated training. METHODS: Experimental longitudinal study of a quantitative character. The sample consisted of twelve general surgery residents. The training was divided into 5 sessions and consisted of participation in 20 gastroenterostomys in synthetic organs. The training was accompanied by an experienced surgeon who was responsible for the feedback and the anastomoses evaluation. The anastomoses evaluated were the first, fourth, sixth, eighth and tenth. A 10 item checklist and the time to evaluate performance were used. RESULTS: Residents showed a reduction in operative time and evolution in the surgical technique statistically significant (p<0.01). The correlation index of 0.545 and 0,295 showed a high linear correlation between time variables and Checklist. The average Checklist score went from 6.8 to 9 points. CONCLUSION: The proposed checklist can be used to evaluate the performance and systematization of a simulated training aimed at configuring a gastroenterostomy. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6585891/ /pubmed/30892394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190030000008 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Barreira, Márcio Alencar
Siveira, Delano Gurgel
Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima
de Moura, Luiz Gonzaga
de Mesquita, Charles Jean Gomes
Borges, Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira
Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
title Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
title_full Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
title_fullStr Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
title_short Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
title_sort evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLE
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30892394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190030000008
work_keys_str_mv AT barreiramarcioalencar evaluationtoolforagastroenterostomysimulatedtraining
AT siveiradelanogurgel evaluationtoolforagastroenterostomysimulatedtraining
AT rochahermanoalexandrelima evaluationtoolforagastroenterostomysimulatedtraining
AT demouraluizgonzaga evaluationtoolforagastroenterostomysimulatedtraining
AT demesquitacharlesjeangomes evaluationtoolforagastroenterostomysimulatedtraining
AT borgesgleydsoncesardeoliveira evaluationtoolforagastroenterostomysimulatedtraining