Cargando…
A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes
Phenotypic integration and modularity are ubiquitous features of complex organisms, describing the magnitude and pattern of relationships among biological traits. A key prediction is that these relationships, reflecting genetic, developmental, and functional interactions, shape evolutionary processe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.13608 |
_version_ | 1783428807936442368 |
---|---|
author | Felice, Ryan N. Randau, Marcela Goswami, Anjali |
author_facet | Felice, Ryan N. Randau, Marcela Goswami, Anjali |
author_sort | Felice, Ryan N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Phenotypic integration and modularity are ubiquitous features of complex organisms, describing the magnitude and pattern of relationships among biological traits. A key prediction is that these relationships, reflecting genetic, developmental, and functional interactions, shape evolutionary processes by governing evolvability and constraint. Over the last 60 years, a rich literature of research has quantified patterns of integration and modularity across a variety of clades and systems. Only recently has it become possible to contextualize these findings in a phylogenetic framework to understand how trait integration interacts with evolutionary tempo and mode. Here, we review the state of macroevolutionary studies of integration and modularity, synthesizing empirical and theoretical work into a conceptual framework for predicting the effects of integration on evolutionary rate and disparity: a fly in a tube. While magnitude of integration is expected to influence the potential for phenotypic variation to be produced and maintained, thus defining the shape and size of a tube in morphospace, evolutionary rate, or the speed at which a fly moves around the tube, is not necessarily controlled by trait interactions. Finally, we demonstrate this reduced disparity relative to the Brownian expectation for a given rate of evolution with an empirical example: the avian cranium. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6585935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65859352019-06-27 A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes Felice, Ryan N. Randau, Marcela Goswami, Anjali Evolution Perspective Phenotypic integration and modularity are ubiquitous features of complex organisms, describing the magnitude and pattern of relationships among biological traits. A key prediction is that these relationships, reflecting genetic, developmental, and functional interactions, shape evolutionary processes by governing evolvability and constraint. Over the last 60 years, a rich literature of research has quantified patterns of integration and modularity across a variety of clades and systems. Only recently has it become possible to contextualize these findings in a phylogenetic framework to understand how trait integration interacts with evolutionary tempo and mode. Here, we review the state of macroevolutionary studies of integration and modularity, synthesizing empirical and theoretical work into a conceptual framework for predicting the effects of integration on evolutionary rate and disparity: a fly in a tube. While magnitude of integration is expected to influence the potential for phenotypic variation to be produced and maintained, thus defining the shape and size of a tube in morphospace, evolutionary rate, or the speed at which a fly moves around the tube, is not necessarily controlled by trait interactions. Finally, we demonstrate this reduced disparity relative to the Brownian expectation for a given rate of evolution with an empirical example: the avian cranium. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-08 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6585935/ /pubmed/30246245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.13608 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Felice, Ryan N. Randau, Marcela Goswami, Anjali A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes |
title | A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes |
title_full | A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes |
title_fullStr | A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes |
title_full_unstemmed | A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes |
title_short | A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes |
title_sort | fly in a tube: macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.13608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feliceryann aflyinatubemacroevolutionaryexpectationsforintegratedphenotypes AT randaumarcela aflyinatubemacroevolutionaryexpectationsforintegratedphenotypes AT goswamianjali aflyinatubemacroevolutionaryexpectationsforintegratedphenotypes AT feliceryann flyinatubemacroevolutionaryexpectationsforintegratedphenotypes AT randaumarcela flyinatubemacroevolutionaryexpectationsforintegratedphenotypes AT goswamianjali flyinatubemacroevolutionaryexpectationsforintegratedphenotypes |