Cargando…

Evaluation of resorbable polydioxanone and polyglycolic acid meshes in a rat model of ventral hernia repair

The objective of this study was to evaluate physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the polydioxanone (PDO) monofilament meshes and polyglycolide (PGA) polyfilament meshes in comparison with Permacol(®) implants. In rat experimental model, a 1.5 × 2.0 cm defect in abdominal wall was recon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fatkhudinov, Timur, Tsedik, Larisa, Arutyunyan, Irina, Lokhonina, Anastasia, Makarov, Andrey, Korshunov, Aleksey, Elchaninov, Andrey, Kananykhina, Evgeniya, Vasyukova, Olesya, Usman, Natalia, Uvarova, Elena, Chuprynin, Vladimir, Eremina, Irina, Degtyarev, Dmitry, Sukhikh, Gennady
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30091512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34158
_version_ 1783428808161886208
author Fatkhudinov, Timur
Tsedik, Larisa
Arutyunyan, Irina
Lokhonina, Anastasia
Makarov, Andrey
Korshunov, Aleksey
Elchaninov, Andrey
Kananykhina, Evgeniya
Vasyukova, Olesya
Usman, Natalia
Uvarova, Elena
Chuprynin, Vladimir
Eremina, Irina
Degtyarev, Dmitry
Sukhikh, Gennady
author_facet Fatkhudinov, Timur
Tsedik, Larisa
Arutyunyan, Irina
Lokhonina, Anastasia
Makarov, Andrey
Korshunov, Aleksey
Elchaninov, Andrey
Kananykhina, Evgeniya
Vasyukova, Olesya
Usman, Natalia
Uvarova, Elena
Chuprynin, Vladimir
Eremina, Irina
Degtyarev, Dmitry
Sukhikh, Gennady
author_sort Fatkhudinov, Timur
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to evaluate physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the polydioxanone (PDO) monofilament meshes and polyglycolide (PGA) polyfilament meshes in comparison with Permacol(®) implants. In rat experimental model, a 1.5 × 2.0 cm defect in abdominal wall was reconstructed by using the Permacol surgical implant or knitted meshes produced from either PDO monofilament, or PGA multifilament. The implant sites were assessed for the tensile strength and the extents of material resorption, host inflammatory response and host tissue replacement on days 3, 10, 30, or 60 after the surgery. The PDO and PGA meshes were rapidly pervaded by the host connective tissue with elements of skeletal muscle histogenesis. The degree of adhesions was significantly higher in the Permacol group. All of the prostheses underwent resorption, which correlated with gradual decreases in the overall tensile strength of the site and the Col1a1 gene expression level. Elevated expression of Fgf2 gene maintained longer in the PDO group, and the Mmp9 gene expression level in this group was higher than in the other groups. Gene expression levels of inflammatory cytokines were higher in the Permacol group. The foreign body giant cell numbers were lower in the PDO and Permacol groups than in the PGA group. Minimal macrophage infiltration with predominance of M2 cells was observed in the PDO group. Overall, the PDO prosthesis turned out to be significantly better than the PGA or Permacol prostheses by a number of indicators of biocompatibility and efficacy. © 2018 The Authors Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 00B: 000–000, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 652–663, 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6585936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65859362019-06-27 Evaluation of resorbable polydioxanone and polyglycolic acid meshes in a rat model of ventral hernia repair Fatkhudinov, Timur Tsedik, Larisa Arutyunyan, Irina Lokhonina, Anastasia Makarov, Andrey Korshunov, Aleksey Elchaninov, Andrey Kananykhina, Evgeniya Vasyukova, Olesya Usman, Natalia Uvarova, Elena Chuprynin, Vladimir Eremina, Irina Degtyarev, Dmitry Sukhikh, Gennady J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Original Research Reports The objective of this study was to evaluate physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the polydioxanone (PDO) monofilament meshes and polyglycolide (PGA) polyfilament meshes in comparison with Permacol(®) implants. In rat experimental model, a 1.5 × 2.0 cm defect in abdominal wall was reconstructed by using the Permacol surgical implant or knitted meshes produced from either PDO monofilament, or PGA multifilament. The implant sites were assessed for the tensile strength and the extents of material resorption, host inflammatory response and host tissue replacement on days 3, 10, 30, or 60 after the surgery. The PDO and PGA meshes were rapidly pervaded by the host connective tissue with elements of skeletal muscle histogenesis. The degree of adhesions was significantly higher in the Permacol group. All of the prostheses underwent resorption, which correlated with gradual decreases in the overall tensile strength of the site and the Col1a1 gene expression level. Elevated expression of Fgf2 gene maintained longer in the PDO group, and the Mmp9 gene expression level in this group was higher than in the other groups. Gene expression levels of inflammatory cytokines were higher in the Permacol group. The foreign body giant cell numbers were lower in the PDO and Permacol groups than in the PGA group. Minimal macrophage infiltration with predominance of M2 cells was observed in the PDO group. Overall, the PDO prosthesis turned out to be significantly better than the PGA or Permacol prostheses by a number of indicators of biocompatibility and efficacy. © 2018 The Authors Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 00B: 000–000, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 652–663, 2019. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018-08-09 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6585936/ /pubmed/30091512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34158 Text en © 2018 The Authors Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Reports
Fatkhudinov, Timur
Tsedik, Larisa
Arutyunyan, Irina
Lokhonina, Anastasia
Makarov, Andrey
Korshunov, Aleksey
Elchaninov, Andrey
Kananykhina, Evgeniya
Vasyukova, Olesya
Usman, Natalia
Uvarova, Elena
Chuprynin, Vladimir
Eremina, Irina
Degtyarev, Dmitry
Sukhikh, Gennady
Evaluation of resorbable polydioxanone and polyglycolic acid meshes in a rat model of ventral hernia repair
title Evaluation of resorbable polydioxanone and polyglycolic acid meshes in a rat model of ventral hernia repair
title_full Evaluation of resorbable polydioxanone and polyglycolic acid meshes in a rat model of ventral hernia repair
title_fullStr Evaluation of resorbable polydioxanone and polyglycolic acid meshes in a rat model of ventral hernia repair
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of resorbable polydioxanone and polyglycolic acid meshes in a rat model of ventral hernia repair
title_short Evaluation of resorbable polydioxanone and polyglycolic acid meshes in a rat model of ventral hernia repair
title_sort evaluation of resorbable polydioxanone and polyglycolic acid meshes in a rat model of ventral hernia repair
topic Original Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30091512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34158
work_keys_str_mv AT fatkhudinovtimur evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT tsediklarisa evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT arutyunyanirina evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT lokhoninaanastasia evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT makarovandrey evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT korshunovaleksey evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT elchaninovandrey evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT kananykhinaevgeniya evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT vasyukovaolesya evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT usmannatalia evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT uvarovaelena evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT chupryninvladimir evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT ereminairina evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT degtyarevdmitry evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair
AT sukhikhgennady evaluationofresorbablepolydioxanoneandpolyglycolicacidmeshesinaratmodelofventralherniarepair