Cargando…

Changes in health‐related quality of life after discharge from an intensive care unit: a systematic review

Quality of life after critical illness is becoming increasingly important as survival improves. Various measures have been used to study the quality of life of patients discharged from intensive care. We systematically reviewed validated measures of quality of life and their results. We searched Pub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerth, A. M. J., Hatch, R. A., Young, J. D., Watkinson, P. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30291744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.14444
_version_ 1783428829093560320
author Gerth, A. M. J.
Hatch, R. A.
Young, J. D.
Watkinson, P. J.
author_facet Gerth, A. M. J.
Hatch, R. A.
Young, J. D.
Watkinson, P. J.
author_sort Gerth, A. M. J.
collection PubMed
description Quality of life after critical illness is becoming increasingly important as survival improves. Various measures have been used to study the quality of life of patients discharged from intensive care. We systematically reviewed validated measures of quality of life and their results. We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science and Open Grey for studies of quality of life, measured after discharge from intensive care. We categorised studied populations as: general; restricted to level‐3 care or critical care beyond 5 days; and septic patients. We included quality of life measured at any time after hospital discharge. We identified 48 studies. Thirty‐one studies used the Medical Outcomes Study 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) and 19 used the EuroQol‐5D (EQ‐5D); eight used both and nine used alternative validated measures. Follow‐up rates ranged from 26–100%. Quality of life after critical care was worse than for age‐ and sex‐matched populations. Quality of life improved for one year after hospital discharge. The aspects of life that improved most were physical function, physical role, vitality and social function. However, these domains were also the least likely to recover to population norms as they were more profoundly affected by critical illness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6586053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65860532019-06-27 Changes in health‐related quality of life after discharge from an intensive care unit: a systematic review Gerth, A. M. J. Hatch, R. A. Young, J. D. Watkinson, P. J. Anaesthesia Review Articles Quality of life after critical illness is becoming increasingly important as survival improves. Various measures have been used to study the quality of life of patients discharged from intensive care. We systematically reviewed validated measures of quality of life and their results. We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science and Open Grey for studies of quality of life, measured after discharge from intensive care. We categorised studied populations as: general; restricted to level‐3 care or critical care beyond 5 days; and septic patients. We included quality of life measured at any time after hospital discharge. We identified 48 studies. Thirty‐one studies used the Medical Outcomes Study 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) and 19 used the EuroQol‐5D (EQ‐5D); eight used both and nine used alternative validated measures. Follow‐up rates ranged from 26–100%. Quality of life after critical care was worse than for age‐ and sex‐matched populations. Quality of life improved for one year after hospital discharge. The aspects of life that improved most were physical function, physical role, vitality and social function. However, these domains were also the least likely to recover to population norms as they were more profoundly affected by critical illness. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-06 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6586053/ /pubmed/30291744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.14444 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Gerth, A. M. J.
Hatch, R. A.
Young, J. D.
Watkinson, P. J.
Changes in health‐related quality of life after discharge from an intensive care unit: a systematic review
title Changes in health‐related quality of life after discharge from an intensive care unit: a systematic review
title_full Changes in health‐related quality of life after discharge from an intensive care unit: a systematic review
title_fullStr Changes in health‐related quality of life after discharge from an intensive care unit: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Changes in health‐related quality of life after discharge from an intensive care unit: a systematic review
title_short Changes in health‐related quality of life after discharge from an intensive care unit: a systematic review
title_sort changes in health‐related quality of life after discharge from an intensive care unit: a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30291744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.14444
work_keys_str_mv AT gerthamj changesinhealthrelatedqualityoflifeafterdischargefromanintensivecareunitasystematicreview
AT hatchra changesinhealthrelatedqualityoflifeafterdischargefromanintensivecareunitasystematicreview
AT youngjd changesinhealthrelatedqualityoflifeafterdischargefromanintensivecareunitasystematicreview
AT watkinsonpj changesinhealthrelatedqualityoflifeafterdischargefromanintensivecareunitasystematicreview