Cargando…
The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database
Osteoporosis is associated with an increased risk of pathologic fractures; however, most patients do not receive diagnosis and adequate treatment. The aim of our study was to compare the yearly trends of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in the USA (US) inpatients. We used National (...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2019.1618660 |
_version_ | 1783428838630359040 |
---|---|
author | Dhital, Rashmi Lynn, Theresa Tachamo, Niranjan Poudel, Dilli Ram |
author_facet | Dhital, Rashmi Lynn, Theresa Tachamo, Niranjan Poudel, Dilli Ram |
author_sort | Dhital, Rashmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Osteoporosis is associated with an increased risk of pathologic fractures; however, most patients do not receive diagnosis and adequate treatment. The aim of our study was to compare the yearly trends of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in the USA (US) inpatients. We used National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample database to identify adults ≥18 years with diagnoses of osteoporosis and pathologic fractures and excluded pathologic fractures due to other etiologies. We then studied the annual trends, in terms of annual percentage change (APC), of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Among overall hospitalizations, osteoporosis was noted to have an increasing trend from 2000 to 2009 (APC = 5.81, p < 0.05) with a decline thereafter (APC = – 3.88, p < 0.05). In contrast, osteoporotic fracture showed an initial downward trend from 2000 to 2010 (APC = −7.31, p < 0.05), followed by a slowly rising trend (APC = 2.0, p = NS). The initially increasing trend of osteoporosis was followed by a decreasing trend thereafter. In contrast, there was a halt in a previously declining trend of osteoporotic fracture. Potential explanations include inadequate screening and treatment per guidelines along with decreasing patient compliance. In conclusion, primary and secondary prevention measures for osteoporosis have been underutilized by both physicians and patients alike. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6586094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65860942019-06-28 The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database Dhital, Rashmi Lynn, Theresa Tachamo, Niranjan Poudel, Dilli Ram J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Research Article Osteoporosis is associated with an increased risk of pathologic fractures; however, most patients do not receive diagnosis and adequate treatment. The aim of our study was to compare the yearly trends of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in the USA (US) inpatients. We used National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample database to identify adults ≥18 years with diagnoses of osteoporosis and pathologic fractures and excluded pathologic fractures due to other etiologies. We then studied the annual trends, in terms of annual percentage change (APC), of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Among overall hospitalizations, osteoporosis was noted to have an increasing trend from 2000 to 2009 (APC = 5.81, p < 0.05) with a decline thereafter (APC = – 3.88, p < 0.05). In contrast, osteoporotic fracture showed an initial downward trend from 2000 to 2010 (APC = −7.31, p < 0.05), followed by a slowly rising trend (APC = 2.0, p = NS). The initially increasing trend of osteoporosis was followed by a decreasing trend thereafter. In contrast, there was a halt in a previously declining trend of osteoporotic fracture. Potential explanations include inadequate screening and treatment per guidelines along with decreasing patient compliance. In conclusion, primary and secondary prevention measures for osteoporosis have been underutilized by both physicians and patients alike. Taylor & Francis 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6586094/ /pubmed/31258859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2019.1618660 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of Greater Baltimore Medical Center. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dhital, Rashmi Lynn, Theresa Tachamo, Niranjan Poudel, Dilli Ram The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database |
title | The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database |
title_full | The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database |
title_fullStr | The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database |
title_full_unstemmed | The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database |
title_short | The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database |
title_sort | trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2019.1618660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dhitalrashmi thetrendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase AT lynntheresa thetrendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase AT tachamoniranjan thetrendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase AT poudeldilliram thetrendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase AT dhitalrashmi trendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase AT lynntheresa trendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase AT tachamoniranjan trendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase AT poudeldilliram trendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase |