Cargando…

The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database

Osteoporosis is associated with an increased risk of pathologic fractures; however, most patients do not receive diagnosis and adequate treatment. The aim of our study was to compare the yearly trends of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in the USA (US) inpatients. We used National (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhital, Rashmi, Lynn, Theresa, Tachamo, Niranjan, Poudel, Dilli Ram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2019.1618660
_version_ 1783428838630359040
author Dhital, Rashmi
Lynn, Theresa
Tachamo, Niranjan
Poudel, Dilli Ram
author_facet Dhital, Rashmi
Lynn, Theresa
Tachamo, Niranjan
Poudel, Dilli Ram
author_sort Dhital, Rashmi
collection PubMed
description Osteoporosis is associated with an increased risk of pathologic fractures; however, most patients do not receive diagnosis and adequate treatment. The aim of our study was to compare the yearly trends of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in the USA (US) inpatients. We used National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample database to identify adults ≥18 years with diagnoses of osteoporosis and pathologic fractures and excluded pathologic fractures due to other etiologies. We then studied the annual trends, in terms of annual percentage change (APC), of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Among overall hospitalizations, osteoporosis was noted to have an increasing trend from 2000 to 2009 (APC = 5.81, p < 0.05) with a decline thereafter (APC = – 3.88, p < 0.05). In contrast, osteoporotic fracture showed an initial downward trend from 2000 to 2010 (APC = −7.31, p < 0.05), followed by a slowly rising trend (APC = 2.0, p = NS). The initially increasing trend of osteoporosis was followed by a decreasing trend thereafter. In contrast, there was a halt in a previously declining trend of osteoporotic fracture. Potential explanations include inadequate screening and treatment per guidelines along with decreasing patient compliance. In conclusion, primary and secondary prevention measures for osteoporosis have been underutilized by both physicians and patients alike.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6586094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65860942019-06-28 The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database Dhital, Rashmi Lynn, Theresa Tachamo, Niranjan Poudel, Dilli Ram J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Research Article Osteoporosis is associated with an increased risk of pathologic fractures; however, most patients do not receive diagnosis and adequate treatment. The aim of our study was to compare the yearly trends of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in the USA (US) inpatients. We used National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample database to identify adults ≥18 years with diagnoses of osteoporosis and pathologic fractures and excluded pathologic fractures due to other etiologies. We then studied the annual trends, in terms of annual percentage change (APC), of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Among overall hospitalizations, osteoporosis was noted to have an increasing trend from 2000 to 2009 (APC = 5.81, p < 0.05) with a decline thereafter (APC = – 3.88, p < 0.05). In contrast, osteoporotic fracture showed an initial downward trend from 2000 to 2010 (APC = −7.31, p < 0.05), followed by a slowly rising trend (APC = 2.0, p = NS). The initially increasing trend of osteoporosis was followed by a decreasing trend thereafter. In contrast, there was a halt in a previously declining trend of osteoporotic fracture. Potential explanations include inadequate screening and treatment per guidelines along with decreasing patient compliance. In conclusion, primary and secondary prevention measures for osteoporosis have been underutilized by both physicians and patients alike. Taylor & Francis 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6586094/ /pubmed/31258859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2019.1618660 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of Greater Baltimore Medical Center. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dhital, Rashmi
Lynn, Theresa
Tachamo, Niranjan
Poudel, Dilli Ram
The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database
title The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database
title_full The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database
title_fullStr The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database
title_full_unstemmed The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database
title_short The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database
title_sort trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2019.1618660
work_keys_str_mv AT dhitalrashmi thetrendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase
AT lynntheresa thetrendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase
AT tachamoniranjan thetrendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase
AT poudeldilliram thetrendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase
AT dhitalrashmi trendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase
AT lynntheresa trendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase
AT tachamoniranjan trendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase
AT poudeldilliram trendofosteoporosisandosteoporoticfragilityfracturesininpatientsresultsfromanationaldatabase