Cargando…
Evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: Impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality
In an ever-aging society the demand for bone-defect filling grafts continues to gain in importance. While autologous grafting still prevails as the gold standard, allografts and xenografts present viable alternatives with promising results. Physiochemical properties of a graft strongly depend on the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31220118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218404 |
_version_ | 1783428870071910400 |
---|---|
author | Rasch, Alexander Naujokat, Hendrik Wang, Fanlu Seekamp, Andreas Fuchs, Sabine Klüter, Tim |
author_facet | Rasch, Alexander Naujokat, Hendrik Wang, Fanlu Seekamp, Andreas Fuchs, Sabine Klüter, Tim |
author_sort | Rasch, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | In an ever-aging society the demand for bone-defect filling grafts continues to gain in importance. While autologous grafting still prevails as the gold standard, allografts and xenografts present viable alternatives with promising results. Physiochemical properties of a graft strongly depend on the processing method such as the decellularization protocol. In addition, the physiochemical characteristics are critical factors for a successful integration of the graft after the implantation and might influence mesenchymal stem cell function in therapeutic approaches combining grafts and autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Several decellularization methods have been proposed, however it still remains unclear which method results in favorable physiochemical properties or might be preferred in stem cell applications. In the first part of this study we compared two decellularization approaches resulting in chemically processed allografts (CPAs) or sonication-based processed allografts (SPAs). Each decellularization approach was compared for its decellularization efficacy and its influence on the grafts’ surface texture and composition. In the second part of this study biocompatibility of grafts was assessed by testing the effect of extraction medium on MSC viability and comparing them to commercially available allografts and xenografts. Additionally, grafts’ performance in terms of MSC functionality was assessed by reseeding with MSCs pre-differentiated in osteogenic medium and determining cell adhesion, proliferation, as well as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the degree of mineralization. In summary, results indicate a more effective decellularization for the SPA approach in comparison to the CPA approach. Even though SPA extracts induced a decrease in MSC viability, MSC performance after reseeding was comparable to commercially available grafts based on DNA quantification, alkaline phosphatase activity and quantification of mineralization. Commercial Tutoplast allografts showed overall the best effects on MSC functionality as indicated by extraction biocompatibility testing as well as by comparing proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6586299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65862992019-06-28 Evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: Impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality Rasch, Alexander Naujokat, Hendrik Wang, Fanlu Seekamp, Andreas Fuchs, Sabine Klüter, Tim PLoS One Research Article In an ever-aging society the demand for bone-defect filling grafts continues to gain in importance. While autologous grafting still prevails as the gold standard, allografts and xenografts present viable alternatives with promising results. Physiochemical properties of a graft strongly depend on the processing method such as the decellularization protocol. In addition, the physiochemical characteristics are critical factors for a successful integration of the graft after the implantation and might influence mesenchymal stem cell function in therapeutic approaches combining grafts and autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Several decellularization methods have been proposed, however it still remains unclear which method results in favorable physiochemical properties or might be preferred in stem cell applications. In the first part of this study we compared two decellularization approaches resulting in chemically processed allografts (CPAs) or sonication-based processed allografts (SPAs). Each decellularization approach was compared for its decellularization efficacy and its influence on the grafts’ surface texture and composition. In the second part of this study biocompatibility of grafts was assessed by testing the effect of extraction medium on MSC viability and comparing them to commercially available allografts and xenografts. Additionally, grafts’ performance in terms of MSC functionality was assessed by reseeding with MSCs pre-differentiated in osteogenic medium and determining cell adhesion, proliferation, as well as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the degree of mineralization. In summary, results indicate a more effective decellularization for the SPA approach in comparison to the CPA approach. Even though SPA extracts induced a decrease in MSC viability, MSC performance after reseeding was comparable to commercially available grafts based on DNA quantification, alkaline phosphatase activity and quantification of mineralization. Commercial Tutoplast allografts showed overall the best effects on MSC functionality as indicated by extraction biocompatibility testing as well as by comparing proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. Public Library of Science 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6586299/ /pubmed/31220118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218404 Text en © 2019 Rasch et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rasch, Alexander Naujokat, Hendrik Wang, Fanlu Seekamp, Andreas Fuchs, Sabine Klüter, Tim Evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: Impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality |
title | Evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: Impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality |
title_full | Evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: Impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: Impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: Impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality |
title_short | Evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: Impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality |
title_sort | evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31220118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218404 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raschalexander evaluationofboneallograftprocessingmethodsimpactondecellularizationefficacybiocompatibilityandmesenchymalstemcellfunctionality AT naujokathendrik evaluationofboneallograftprocessingmethodsimpactondecellularizationefficacybiocompatibilityandmesenchymalstemcellfunctionality AT wangfanlu evaluationofboneallograftprocessingmethodsimpactondecellularizationefficacybiocompatibilityandmesenchymalstemcellfunctionality AT seekampandreas evaluationofboneallograftprocessingmethodsimpactondecellularizationefficacybiocompatibilityandmesenchymalstemcellfunctionality AT fuchssabine evaluationofboneallograftprocessingmethodsimpactondecellularizationefficacybiocompatibilityandmesenchymalstemcellfunctionality AT klutertim evaluationofboneallograftprocessingmethodsimpactondecellularizationefficacybiocompatibilityandmesenchymalstemcellfunctionality |