Cargando…

The effects of age at correction of aortic coarctation and recurrent obstruction on adolescent patients: MRI evaluation of wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity

BACKGROUND: Coarctation patients before curative reconstruction are exposed to abnormal flow patterns which potentially could cause wall deterioration. This study evaluated the effect of age at correction on the pulse wave velocity (PWV) and peak wall shear stress (WSS) in adolescent patients with c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juffermans, Joe F., Nederend, Ineke, van den Boogaard, Pieter J., ten Harkel, Arend D. J., Hazekamp, Mark G., Lamb, Hildo J., Roest, Arno A. W., Westenberg, Jos J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31222473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0102-9
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Coarctation patients before curative reconstruction are exposed to abnormal flow patterns which potentially could cause wall deterioration. This study evaluated the effect of age at correction on the pulse wave velocity (PWV) and peak wall shear stress (WSS) in adolescent patients with corrected coarctation. Effects of valve morphology and presence of reobstruction were also evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-one patients aged 13.7 ± 2.6 years (mean ± standard deviation) were included (bicuspid aortic valve, n = 14; reobstruction, n = 9). Mean age at correction was 1.0 ± 1.8 years. PWV was determined from two high-temporal through-plane phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions, for two segments: ascending aorta plus aortic arch and descending aorta. WSS was determined from four-dimensional flow MRI. Peak WSS over five systolic phases was determined for ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta. RESULTS: Patients with tricuspid aortic valve showed a significant correlation between the age at correction and descending aorta PWV (r(s) = 0.80, p = 0.010). Significant differences were found between patients without and with reobstruction for peak WSS in the aortic arch (3.9 ± 1.3 Pa versus 6.5 ± 2.2 Pa, respectively; p = 0.003) and descending aorta (5.0 ± 1.3 Pa versus 6.7 ± 1.1 Pa, respectively; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged period of abnormal haemodynamic exposure may result in increased aortic wall stiffening. The increased peak WSS as results of a reobstruction possibly promotes different disease progression, which endorse longitudinal follow-up examination of corrected coarctation patients.