Cargando…

The effects of age at correction of aortic coarctation and recurrent obstruction on adolescent patients: MRI evaluation of wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity

BACKGROUND: Coarctation patients before curative reconstruction are exposed to abnormal flow patterns which potentially could cause wall deterioration. This study evaluated the effect of age at correction on the pulse wave velocity (PWV) and peak wall shear stress (WSS) in adolescent patients with c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juffermans, Joe F., Nederend, Ineke, van den Boogaard, Pieter J., ten Harkel, Arend D. J., Hazekamp, Mark G., Lamb, Hildo J., Roest, Arno A. W., Westenberg, Jos J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31222473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0102-9
_version_ 1783428937203843072
author Juffermans, Joe F.
Nederend, Ineke
van den Boogaard, Pieter J.
ten Harkel, Arend D. J.
Hazekamp, Mark G.
Lamb, Hildo J.
Roest, Arno A. W.
Westenberg, Jos J. M.
author_facet Juffermans, Joe F.
Nederend, Ineke
van den Boogaard, Pieter J.
ten Harkel, Arend D. J.
Hazekamp, Mark G.
Lamb, Hildo J.
Roest, Arno A. W.
Westenberg, Jos J. M.
author_sort Juffermans, Joe F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coarctation patients before curative reconstruction are exposed to abnormal flow patterns which potentially could cause wall deterioration. This study evaluated the effect of age at correction on the pulse wave velocity (PWV) and peak wall shear stress (WSS) in adolescent patients with corrected coarctation. Effects of valve morphology and presence of reobstruction were also evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-one patients aged 13.7 ± 2.6 years (mean ± standard deviation) were included (bicuspid aortic valve, n = 14; reobstruction, n = 9). Mean age at correction was 1.0 ± 1.8 years. PWV was determined from two high-temporal through-plane phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions, for two segments: ascending aorta plus aortic arch and descending aorta. WSS was determined from four-dimensional flow MRI. Peak WSS over five systolic phases was determined for ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta. RESULTS: Patients with tricuspid aortic valve showed a significant correlation between the age at correction and descending aorta PWV (r(s) = 0.80, p = 0.010). Significant differences were found between patients without and with reobstruction for peak WSS in the aortic arch (3.9 ± 1.3 Pa versus 6.5 ± 2.2 Pa, respectively; p = 0.003) and descending aorta (5.0 ± 1.3 Pa versus 6.7 ± 1.1 Pa, respectively; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged period of abnormal haemodynamic exposure may result in increased aortic wall stiffening. The increased peak WSS as results of a reobstruction possibly promotes different disease progression, which endorse longitudinal follow-up examination of corrected coarctation patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6586735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65867352019-07-05 The effects of age at correction of aortic coarctation and recurrent obstruction on adolescent patients: MRI evaluation of wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity Juffermans, Joe F. Nederend, Ineke van den Boogaard, Pieter J. ten Harkel, Arend D. J. Hazekamp, Mark G. Lamb, Hildo J. Roest, Arno A. W. Westenberg, Jos J. M. Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: Coarctation patients before curative reconstruction are exposed to abnormal flow patterns which potentially could cause wall deterioration. This study evaluated the effect of age at correction on the pulse wave velocity (PWV) and peak wall shear stress (WSS) in adolescent patients with corrected coarctation. Effects of valve morphology and presence of reobstruction were also evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-one patients aged 13.7 ± 2.6 years (mean ± standard deviation) were included (bicuspid aortic valve, n = 14; reobstruction, n = 9). Mean age at correction was 1.0 ± 1.8 years. PWV was determined from two high-temporal through-plane phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions, for two segments: ascending aorta plus aortic arch and descending aorta. WSS was determined from four-dimensional flow MRI. Peak WSS over five systolic phases was determined for ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta. RESULTS: Patients with tricuspid aortic valve showed a significant correlation between the age at correction and descending aorta PWV (r(s) = 0.80, p = 0.010). Significant differences were found between patients without and with reobstruction for peak WSS in the aortic arch (3.9 ± 1.3 Pa versus 6.5 ± 2.2 Pa, respectively; p = 0.003) and descending aorta (5.0 ± 1.3 Pa versus 6.7 ± 1.1 Pa, respectively; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged period of abnormal haemodynamic exposure may result in increased aortic wall stiffening. The increased peak WSS as results of a reobstruction possibly promotes different disease progression, which endorse longitudinal follow-up examination of corrected coarctation patients. Springer International Publishing 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6586735/ /pubmed/31222473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0102-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Juffermans, Joe F.
Nederend, Ineke
van den Boogaard, Pieter J.
ten Harkel, Arend D. J.
Hazekamp, Mark G.
Lamb, Hildo J.
Roest, Arno A. W.
Westenberg, Jos J. M.
The effects of age at correction of aortic coarctation and recurrent obstruction on adolescent patients: MRI evaluation of wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity
title The effects of age at correction of aortic coarctation and recurrent obstruction on adolescent patients: MRI evaluation of wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity
title_full The effects of age at correction of aortic coarctation and recurrent obstruction on adolescent patients: MRI evaluation of wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity
title_fullStr The effects of age at correction of aortic coarctation and recurrent obstruction on adolescent patients: MRI evaluation of wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity
title_full_unstemmed The effects of age at correction of aortic coarctation and recurrent obstruction on adolescent patients: MRI evaluation of wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity
title_short The effects of age at correction of aortic coarctation and recurrent obstruction on adolescent patients: MRI evaluation of wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity
title_sort effects of age at correction of aortic coarctation and recurrent obstruction on adolescent patients: mri evaluation of wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31222473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0102-9
work_keys_str_mv AT juffermansjoef theeffectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT nederendineke theeffectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT vandenboogaardpieterj theeffectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT tenharkelarenddj theeffectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT hazekampmarkg theeffectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT lambhildoj theeffectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT roestarnoaw theeffectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT westenbergjosjm theeffectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT juffermansjoef effectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT nederendineke effectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT vandenboogaardpieterj effectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT tenharkelarenddj effectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT hazekampmarkg effectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT lambhildoj effectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT roestarnoaw effectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity
AT westenbergjosjm effectsofageatcorrectionofaorticcoarctationandrecurrentobstructiononadolescentpatientsmrievaluationofwallshearstressandpulsewavevelocity