Cargando…

Evaluation of six blood-based age prediction models using DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing

DNA methylation has been identified as the most promising molecular biomarker for the prediction of age. Several DNA methylation-based models have been proposed for age prediction based on blood samples, using mainly pyrosequencing. These methods present different performances for age prediction and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daunay, Antoine, Baudrin, Laura G., Deleuze, Jean-François, How-Kit, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31222117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45197-w
_version_ 1783428977766957056
author Daunay, Antoine
Baudrin, Laura G.
Deleuze, Jean-François
How-Kit, Alexandre
author_facet Daunay, Antoine
Baudrin, Laura G.
Deleuze, Jean-François
How-Kit, Alexandre
author_sort Daunay, Antoine
collection PubMed
description DNA methylation has been identified as the most promising molecular biomarker for the prediction of age. Several DNA methylation-based models have been proposed for age prediction based on blood samples, using mainly pyrosequencing. These methods present different performances for age prediction and have rarely, if ever, been evaluated and intercompared in an independent validation study. Here, for the first time, we evaluate and compare six blood-based age prediction models (Bekaert(1), Park(2), Thong(3), Weidner(4), and the Zbiec-Piekarska 1(5) and Zbiec-Piekarska 2(6)), using DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing on 100 blood samples from French individuals aged between 19–65 years. For each model, we perform correlation analysis and evaluate age-prediction performance (mean absolute deviation (MAD) and standard error of the estimate (SEE)). The best age-prediction performances were found with the Bekaert and Thong models (MAD of 4.5–5.2, SEE of 6.8–7.2), followed by the Zbiec-Piekarska 1 model (MAD of 6.8 and SEE of 9.2), while the Park, Weidner and Zbiec-Piekarska 2 models presented lower performances (MAD of 7.2–8.7 and SEE of 9.2–10.3). Given these results, we recommend performing systematic, independent evaluation of all age prediction models on a same cohort to validate the different models and compare their performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6586942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65869422019-06-27 Evaluation of six blood-based age prediction models using DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing Daunay, Antoine Baudrin, Laura G. Deleuze, Jean-François How-Kit, Alexandre Sci Rep Article DNA methylation has been identified as the most promising molecular biomarker for the prediction of age. Several DNA methylation-based models have been proposed for age prediction based on blood samples, using mainly pyrosequencing. These methods present different performances for age prediction and have rarely, if ever, been evaluated and intercompared in an independent validation study. Here, for the first time, we evaluate and compare six blood-based age prediction models (Bekaert(1), Park(2), Thong(3), Weidner(4), and the Zbiec-Piekarska 1(5) and Zbiec-Piekarska 2(6)), using DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing on 100 blood samples from French individuals aged between 19–65 years. For each model, we perform correlation analysis and evaluate age-prediction performance (mean absolute deviation (MAD) and standard error of the estimate (SEE)). The best age-prediction performances were found with the Bekaert and Thong models (MAD of 4.5–5.2, SEE of 6.8–7.2), followed by the Zbiec-Piekarska 1 model (MAD of 6.8 and SEE of 9.2), while the Park, Weidner and Zbiec-Piekarska 2 models presented lower performances (MAD of 7.2–8.7 and SEE of 9.2–10.3). Given these results, we recommend performing systematic, independent evaluation of all age prediction models on a same cohort to validate the different models and compare their performance. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6586942/ /pubmed/31222117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45197-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Daunay, Antoine
Baudrin, Laura G.
Deleuze, Jean-François
How-Kit, Alexandre
Evaluation of six blood-based age prediction models using DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing
title Evaluation of six blood-based age prediction models using DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing
title_full Evaluation of six blood-based age prediction models using DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing
title_fullStr Evaluation of six blood-based age prediction models using DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of six blood-based age prediction models using DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing
title_short Evaluation of six blood-based age prediction models using DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing
title_sort evaluation of six blood-based age prediction models using dna methylation analysis by pyrosequencing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31222117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45197-w
work_keys_str_mv AT daunayantoine evaluationofsixbloodbasedagepredictionmodelsusingdnamethylationanalysisbypyrosequencing
AT baudrinlaurag evaluationofsixbloodbasedagepredictionmodelsusingdnamethylationanalysisbypyrosequencing
AT deleuzejeanfrancois evaluationofsixbloodbasedagepredictionmodelsusingdnamethylationanalysisbypyrosequencing
AT howkitalexandre evaluationofsixbloodbasedagepredictionmodelsusingdnamethylationanalysisbypyrosequencing