Cargando…
Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model
OBJECTIVES: Osseointegrated prostheses are increasingly used for amputees, however, the lengthy rehabilitation time of these prostheses remains a challenge to their implementation. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of locally applied vibration or low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (L...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186385 |
_version_ | 1783429002107551744 |
---|---|
author | Ruppert, David S. Harrysson, Ola L.A. Marcellin-Little, Denis J. Bollenbecker, Seth Weinhold, Paul S. |
author_facet | Ruppert, David S. Harrysson, Ola L.A. Marcellin-Little, Denis J. Bollenbecker, Seth Weinhold, Paul S. |
author_sort | Ruppert, David S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Osseointegrated prostheses are increasingly used for amputees, however, the lengthy rehabilitation time of these prostheses remains a challenge to their implementation. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of locally applied vibration or low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) to accelerate osseointegration and increase peri-implant bone volume. METHODS: A 4-week and 8-week rodent study were conducted in a femoral intramedullary implant model (control, vibration, LIPUS, and combined treatment) to determine effects on healing. Osseointegration was evaluated quantitatively through mechanical, µCT and histological evaluations. RESULTS: Maximum pushout load at 4 weeks increased with LIPUS relative to control (37.7%, P=0.002). Histologically, LIPUS and vibration separately increased peri-implant bone formation after 4 weeks relative to control. Vibration resulted in greater peri-implant bone after 8 weeks than all other groups (25.7%, P<0.001). However, no significant group differences in pushout load were noted at 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Although vibration increased bone around implants, LIPUS was superior to vibration for accelerating osseointegration and increasing bone-implant failure loads at 4 weeks. However, the LIPUS benefits on osseointegration at 4 weeks were not sustained at 8 weeks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6587081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65870812019-06-25 Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model Ruppert, David S. Harrysson, Ola L.A. Marcellin-Little, Denis J. Bollenbecker, Seth Weinhold, Paul S. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Original Article OBJECTIVES: Osseointegrated prostheses are increasingly used for amputees, however, the lengthy rehabilitation time of these prostheses remains a challenge to their implementation. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of locally applied vibration or low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) to accelerate osseointegration and increase peri-implant bone volume. METHODS: A 4-week and 8-week rodent study were conducted in a femoral intramedullary implant model (control, vibration, LIPUS, and combined treatment) to determine effects on healing. Osseointegration was evaluated quantitatively through mechanical, µCT and histological evaluations. RESULTS: Maximum pushout load at 4 weeks increased with LIPUS relative to control (37.7%, P=0.002). Histologically, LIPUS and vibration separately increased peri-implant bone formation after 4 weeks relative to control. Vibration resulted in greater peri-implant bone after 8 weeks than all other groups (25.7%, P<0.001). However, no significant group differences in pushout load were noted at 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Although vibration increased bone around implants, LIPUS was superior to vibration for accelerating osseointegration and increasing bone-implant failure loads at 4 weeks. However, the LIPUS benefits on osseointegration at 4 weeks were not sustained at 8 weeks. International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6587081/ /pubmed/31186385 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ruppert, David S. Harrysson, Ola L.A. Marcellin-Little, Denis J. Bollenbecker, Seth Weinhold, Paul S. Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model |
title | Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model |
title_full | Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model |
title_fullStr | Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model |
title_full_unstemmed | Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model |
title_short | Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model |
title_sort | osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruppertdavids osteogenicbenefitsoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundandvibrationinarodentosseointegrationmodel AT harryssonolala osteogenicbenefitsoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundandvibrationinarodentosseointegrationmodel AT marcellinlittledenisj osteogenicbenefitsoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundandvibrationinarodentosseointegrationmodel AT bollenbeckerseth osteogenicbenefitsoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundandvibrationinarodentosseointegrationmodel AT weinholdpauls osteogenicbenefitsoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundandvibrationinarodentosseointegrationmodel |