Cargando…

Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model

OBJECTIVES: Osseointegrated prostheses are increasingly used for amputees, however, the lengthy rehabilitation time of these prostheses remains a challenge to their implementation. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of locally applied vibration or low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruppert, David S., Harrysson, Ola L.A., Marcellin-Little, Denis J., Bollenbecker, Seth, Weinhold, Paul S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186385
_version_ 1783429002107551744
author Ruppert, David S.
Harrysson, Ola L.A.
Marcellin-Little, Denis J.
Bollenbecker, Seth
Weinhold, Paul S.
author_facet Ruppert, David S.
Harrysson, Ola L.A.
Marcellin-Little, Denis J.
Bollenbecker, Seth
Weinhold, Paul S.
author_sort Ruppert, David S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Osseointegrated prostheses are increasingly used for amputees, however, the lengthy rehabilitation time of these prostheses remains a challenge to their implementation. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of locally applied vibration or low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) to accelerate osseointegration and increase peri-implant bone volume. METHODS: A 4-week and 8-week rodent study were conducted in a femoral intramedullary implant model (control, vibration, LIPUS, and combined treatment) to determine effects on healing. Osseointegration was evaluated quantitatively through mechanical, µCT and histological evaluations. RESULTS: Maximum pushout load at 4 weeks increased with LIPUS relative to control (37.7%, P=0.002). Histologically, LIPUS and vibration separately increased peri-implant bone formation after 4 weeks relative to control. Vibration resulted in greater peri-implant bone after 8 weeks than all other groups (25.7%, P<0.001). However, no significant group differences in pushout load were noted at 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Although vibration increased bone around implants, LIPUS was superior to vibration for accelerating osseointegration and increasing bone-implant failure loads at 4 weeks. However, the LIPUS benefits on osseointegration at 4 weeks were not sustained at 8 weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6587081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65870812019-06-25 Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model Ruppert, David S. Harrysson, Ola L.A. Marcellin-Little, Denis J. Bollenbecker, Seth Weinhold, Paul S. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Original Article OBJECTIVES: Osseointegrated prostheses are increasingly used for amputees, however, the lengthy rehabilitation time of these prostheses remains a challenge to their implementation. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of locally applied vibration or low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) to accelerate osseointegration and increase peri-implant bone volume. METHODS: A 4-week and 8-week rodent study were conducted in a femoral intramedullary implant model (control, vibration, LIPUS, and combined treatment) to determine effects on healing. Osseointegration was evaluated quantitatively through mechanical, µCT and histological evaluations. RESULTS: Maximum pushout load at 4 weeks increased with LIPUS relative to control (37.7%, P=0.002). Histologically, LIPUS and vibration separately increased peri-implant bone formation after 4 weeks relative to control. Vibration resulted in greater peri-implant bone after 8 weeks than all other groups (25.7%, P<0.001). However, no significant group differences in pushout load were noted at 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Although vibration increased bone around implants, LIPUS was superior to vibration for accelerating osseointegration and increasing bone-implant failure loads at 4 weeks. However, the LIPUS benefits on osseointegration at 4 weeks were not sustained at 8 weeks. International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6587081/ /pubmed/31186385 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ruppert, David S.
Harrysson, Ola L.A.
Marcellin-Little, Denis J.
Bollenbecker, Seth
Weinhold, Paul S.
Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model
title Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model
title_full Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model
title_fullStr Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model
title_full_unstemmed Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model
title_short Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model
title_sort osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186385
work_keys_str_mv AT ruppertdavids osteogenicbenefitsoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundandvibrationinarodentosseointegrationmodel
AT harryssonolala osteogenicbenefitsoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundandvibrationinarodentosseointegrationmodel
AT marcellinlittledenisj osteogenicbenefitsoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundandvibrationinarodentosseointegrationmodel
AT bollenbeckerseth osteogenicbenefitsoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundandvibrationinarodentosseointegrationmodel
AT weinholdpauls osteogenicbenefitsoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundandvibrationinarodentosseointegrationmodel