Cargando…

Breast Cancer Detection: The Development and Pilot Study of a “Tactile Landscape” as a Standardized Testing Tool

INTRODUCTION: There is still a need for competent breast lump detection palpation skills, especially in developing countries. Our goal is to design, develop, and establish a test to determine whether students can, by touch alone, identify and discriminate between a range of different simulated lesio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veitch, Daisy E., Bochner, Melissa, Molenbroek, Johan F. M., Goossens, Richard H. M., Owen, Harry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30969270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000365
_version_ 1783429025057734656
author Veitch, Daisy E.
Bochner, Melissa
Molenbroek, Johan F. M.
Goossens, Richard H. M.
Owen, Harry
author_facet Veitch, Daisy E.
Bochner, Melissa
Molenbroek, Johan F. M.
Goossens, Richard H. M.
Owen, Harry
author_sort Veitch, Daisy E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is still a need for competent breast lump detection palpation skills, especially in developing countries. Our goal is to design, develop, and establish a test to determine whether students can, by touch alone, identify and discriminate between a range of different simulated lesions at different adiposity levels. METHODS: Common lesions, breast cancers, and cysts were physically simulated and hidden in a test object referred to as the “tactile landscape” (TL). Ribs, intercostal muscle, and nodularity—normal anatomical features—increased their realistic complexity. Varying depths of features simulated varying degrees of adiposity. A testing protocol was created to determine the testee's ability to identify and discriminate different commonly occurring breast masses using palpation. Five experts (four breast surgeons and one general practitioner) and 20 inexperienced medical students were recruited and tested. Results were compared. RESULTS: The TL has been based on previously verified breast models and has softness similar to 53% of women's breasts and nodularity similar to 60% as assessed in a breast clinic by breast surgeons. The five experts indicated that the simulated lesions felt like those they might encounter in clinical practice and all of them identified the lesions and nonlesions hidden in the TL 100% correctly, thus indicating the value of the model. In contrast, only one student was able to identify all the lesions. One student identified none of them. The remaining students mean score was 65%. CONCLUSIONS: All students but one performed poorly in comparison to the experts. This indicates that the test could be useful to test students' ability to identify and discriminate breast masses. If successful, it will add previously missing capability to the mix of assessment instruments already used, thus potentially improving clinical breast examination training and assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6587231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65872312019-07-22 Breast Cancer Detection: The Development and Pilot Study of a “Tactile Landscape” as a Standardized Testing Tool Veitch, Daisy E. Bochner, Melissa Molenbroek, Johan F. M. Goossens, Richard H. M. Owen, Harry Simul Healthc Technical Report INTRODUCTION: There is still a need for competent breast lump detection palpation skills, especially in developing countries. Our goal is to design, develop, and establish a test to determine whether students can, by touch alone, identify and discriminate between a range of different simulated lesions at different adiposity levels. METHODS: Common lesions, breast cancers, and cysts were physically simulated and hidden in a test object referred to as the “tactile landscape” (TL). Ribs, intercostal muscle, and nodularity—normal anatomical features—increased their realistic complexity. Varying depths of features simulated varying degrees of adiposity. A testing protocol was created to determine the testee's ability to identify and discriminate different commonly occurring breast masses using palpation. Five experts (four breast surgeons and one general practitioner) and 20 inexperienced medical students were recruited and tested. Results were compared. RESULTS: The TL has been based on previously verified breast models and has softness similar to 53% of women's breasts and nodularity similar to 60% as assessed in a breast clinic by breast surgeons. The five experts indicated that the simulated lesions felt like those they might encounter in clinical practice and all of them identified the lesions and nonlesions hidden in the TL 100% correctly, thus indicating the value of the model. In contrast, only one student was able to identify all the lesions. One student identified none of them. The remaining students mean score was 65%. CONCLUSIONS: All students but one performed poorly in comparison to the experts. This indicates that the test could be useful to test students' ability to identify and discriminate breast masses. If successful, it will add previously missing capability to the mix of assessment instruments already used, thus potentially improving clinical breast examination training and assessment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-06 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6587231/ /pubmed/30969270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000365 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Technical Report
Veitch, Daisy E.
Bochner, Melissa
Molenbroek, Johan F. M.
Goossens, Richard H. M.
Owen, Harry
Breast Cancer Detection: The Development and Pilot Study of a “Tactile Landscape” as a Standardized Testing Tool
title Breast Cancer Detection: The Development and Pilot Study of a “Tactile Landscape” as a Standardized Testing Tool
title_full Breast Cancer Detection: The Development and Pilot Study of a “Tactile Landscape” as a Standardized Testing Tool
title_fullStr Breast Cancer Detection: The Development and Pilot Study of a “Tactile Landscape” as a Standardized Testing Tool
title_full_unstemmed Breast Cancer Detection: The Development and Pilot Study of a “Tactile Landscape” as a Standardized Testing Tool
title_short Breast Cancer Detection: The Development and Pilot Study of a “Tactile Landscape” as a Standardized Testing Tool
title_sort breast cancer detection: the development and pilot study of a “tactile landscape” as a standardized testing tool
topic Technical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30969270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000365
work_keys_str_mv AT veitchdaisye breastcancerdetectionthedevelopmentandpilotstudyofatactilelandscapeasastandardizedtestingtool
AT bochnermelissa breastcancerdetectionthedevelopmentandpilotstudyofatactilelandscapeasastandardizedtestingtool
AT molenbroekjohanfm breastcancerdetectionthedevelopmentandpilotstudyofatactilelandscapeasastandardizedtestingtool
AT goossensrichardhm breastcancerdetectionthedevelopmentandpilotstudyofatactilelandscapeasastandardizedtestingtool
AT owenharry breastcancerdetectionthedevelopmentandpilotstudyofatactilelandscapeasastandardizedtestingtool