Cargando…

Chinese health literacy scale for tuberculosis patients: a study on development and psychometric testing

BACKGROUND: The role of health literacy on tuberculosis patients has not been evaluated in China, in part because few special health literacy measurements exist. METHODS: A three-step design process was used: (1) Scale construction: Based on the model of revised Bloom’s taxonomy, the item-pool was d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yan, Zhang, Shaoru, Zhang, Tianhua, Cao, Yi, Liu, Weiping, Jiang, Hualin, Ren, Dan, Ren, Jing, Liu, Haini, Hua, Zhongqiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4168-z
_version_ 1783429029796249600
author Li, Yan
Zhang, Shaoru
Zhang, Tianhua
Cao, Yi
Liu, Weiping
Jiang, Hualin
Ren, Dan
Ren, Jing
Liu, Haini
Hua, Zhongqiu
author_facet Li, Yan
Zhang, Shaoru
Zhang, Tianhua
Cao, Yi
Liu, Weiping
Jiang, Hualin
Ren, Dan
Ren, Jing
Liu, Haini
Hua, Zhongqiu
author_sort Li, Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of health literacy on tuberculosis patients has not been evaluated in China, in part because few special health literacy measurements exist. METHODS: A three-step design process was used: (1) Scale construction: Based on the model of revised Bloom’s taxonomy, the item-pool was drafted from a literature review, focus group discussion, and in-depth interviews. In addition, a Delphi survey was used in order to select items for inclusion in the scales; (2) Pilot study: Acceptability and clarity were tested with 60 tuberculosis patients; and (3) Psychometric testing: Validity analysis includes content validity, construct validity, and discriminative validity. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, split-half reliability, and test-retest method were used to assess reliability. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to generate a cut-off point. RESULTS: The final scale had 29 items with four domains. The item level Content Validity Index ranged from 0.70 to 1.0, and the scale level Content Validity Index was 0.95. The mean score among the lowest 27% group was significantly lower than that those of the highest 27% group (p < 0.01), which supports adequate discriminant validity. Explanatory factor analysis produced a clear four-factor construct, explaining 47.254% of the total variance. Factor 1 and Factor 2 were consistent with read and memorize TB-related words; Factor 3 was associated with understand the meaning of the health education leaflets and examine if TB patients can apply the correct approach to correct context; Factor 4 was related to the ability of TB patient to calculate and identify what unspecified assumptions are included in known conditions. The confirmatory factory analysis results confirmed that a four-factor model was an acceptable fit to the data, with a goodness-of-fit index = 0.930, adjusted goodness of fit index = 0.970, root mean square error of approximation = 0.069, and χ2/df = 2.153. The scale had good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Additionally, the receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that the cut-off point for the instrument was set at 45 and 35. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese Health Literacy scale for Tuberculosis has good reliability and validity, and it could be used for measuring the health literacy of Chinese patients with tuberculosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6587253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65872532019-06-27 Chinese health literacy scale for tuberculosis patients: a study on development and psychometric testing Li, Yan Zhang, Shaoru Zhang, Tianhua Cao, Yi Liu, Weiping Jiang, Hualin Ren, Dan Ren, Jing Liu, Haini Hua, Zhongqiu BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The role of health literacy on tuberculosis patients has not been evaluated in China, in part because few special health literacy measurements exist. METHODS: A three-step design process was used: (1) Scale construction: Based on the model of revised Bloom’s taxonomy, the item-pool was drafted from a literature review, focus group discussion, and in-depth interviews. In addition, a Delphi survey was used in order to select items for inclusion in the scales; (2) Pilot study: Acceptability and clarity were tested with 60 tuberculosis patients; and (3) Psychometric testing: Validity analysis includes content validity, construct validity, and discriminative validity. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, split-half reliability, and test-retest method were used to assess reliability. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to generate a cut-off point. RESULTS: The final scale had 29 items with four domains. The item level Content Validity Index ranged from 0.70 to 1.0, and the scale level Content Validity Index was 0.95. The mean score among the lowest 27% group was significantly lower than that those of the highest 27% group (p < 0.01), which supports adequate discriminant validity. Explanatory factor analysis produced a clear four-factor construct, explaining 47.254% of the total variance. Factor 1 and Factor 2 were consistent with read and memorize TB-related words; Factor 3 was associated with understand the meaning of the health education leaflets and examine if TB patients can apply the correct approach to correct context; Factor 4 was related to the ability of TB patient to calculate and identify what unspecified assumptions are included in known conditions. The confirmatory factory analysis results confirmed that a four-factor model was an acceptable fit to the data, with a goodness-of-fit index = 0.930, adjusted goodness of fit index = 0.970, root mean square error of approximation = 0.069, and χ2/df = 2.153. The scale had good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Additionally, the receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that the cut-off point for the instrument was set at 45 and 35. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese Health Literacy scale for Tuberculosis has good reliability and validity, and it could be used for measuring the health literacy of Chinese patients with tuberculosis. BioMed Central 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6587253/ /pubmed/31221099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4168-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Yan
Zhang, Shaoru
Zhang, Tianhua
Cao, Yi
Liu, Weiping
Jiang, Hualin
Ren, Dan
Ren, Jing
Liu, Haini
Hua, Zhongqiu
Chinese health literacy scale for tuberculosis patients: a study on development and psychometric testing
title Chinese health literacy scale for tuberculosis patients: a study on development and psychometric testing
title_full Chinese health literacy scale for tuberculosis patients: a study on development and psychometric testing
title_fullStr Chinese health literacy scale for tuberculosis patients: a study on development and psychometric testing
title_full_unstemmed Chinese health literacy scale for tuberculosis patients: a study on development and psychometric testing
title_short Chinese health literacy scale for tuberculosis patients: a study on development and psychometric testing
title_sort chinese health literacy scale for tuberculosis patients: a study on development and psychometric testing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4168-z
work_keys_str_mv AT liyan chinesehealthliteracyscalefortuberculosispatientsastudyondevelopmentandpsychometrictesting
AT zhangshaoru chinesehealthliteracyscalefortuberculosispatientsastudyondevelopmentandpsychometrictesting
AT zhangtianhua chinesehealthliteracyscalefortuberculosispatientsastudyondevelopmentandpsychometrictesting
AT caoyi chinesehealthliteracyscalefortuberculosispatientsastudyondevelopmentandpsychometrictesting
AT liuweiping chinesehealthliteracyscalefortuberculosispatientsastudyondevelopmentandpsychometrictesting
AT jianghualin chinesehealthliteracyscalefortuberculosispatientsastudyondevelopmentandpsychometrictesting
AT rendan chinesehealthliteracyscalefortuberculosispatientsastudyondevelopmentandpsychometrictesting
AT renjing chinesehealthliteracyscalefortuberculosispatientsastudyondevelopmentandpsychometrictesting
AT liuhaini chinesehealthliteracyscalefortuberculosispatientsastudyondevelopmentandpsychometrictesting
AT huazhongqiu chinesehealthliteracyscalefortuberculosispatientsastudyondevelopmentandpsychometrictesting