Cargando…
Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture
In this study, the adsorption properties of a Stöber silica‐based material towards CO(2) were evaluated for the first time. The use of Stöber silica as support is interesting for real technological applications mainly due to economic factors. Furthermore, a direct comparison between the non porous S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.201900084 |
_version_ | 1783429043883868160 |
---|---|
author | Vittoni, Chiara Gatti, Giorgio Paul, Geo Mangano, Enzo Brandani, Stefano Bisio, Chiara Marchese, Leonardo |
author_facet | Vittoni, Chiara Gatti, Giorgio Paul, Geo Mangano, Enzo Brandani, Stefano Bisio, Chiara Marchese, Leonardo |
author_sort | Vittoni, Chiara |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, the adsorption properties of a Stöber silica‐based material towards CO(2) were evaluated for the first time. The use of Stöber silica as support is interesting for real technological applications mainly due to economic factors. Furthermore, a direct comparison between the non porous Stöber sample with an ordered porous material (based on MCM‐41 silica) allowed to evaluate the effect of the porosity on the CO(2) adsorption properties. In order to make silica materials reactive towards CO(2), they were functionalized by introducing amino groups via grafting of 3‐[2‐(2‐aminoethyl)aminoethyl]aminopropyltrimethoxysilane. After a qualitative study of the CO(2) adsorption, the quantitative determination of CO(2) adsorption capacity at 35 °C revealed that the mesoporous material is more efficient compared to the Stöber‐based one (adsorption capacity values of 0.49 and 0.58 mol/kg for Stöber‐based and mesoporous samples). However, since the difference in the adsorption capacity is only about 15 % and the Stöber‐based sample is considerably cheaper, the non‐porous sample should be considered as a favourable adsorbent material for CO(2) capture applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6587325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65873252019-07-02 Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture Vittoni, Chiara Gatti, Giorgio Paul, Geo Mangano, Enzo Brandani, Stefano Bisio, Chiara Marchese, Leonardo ChemistryOpen Full Papers In this study, the adsorption properties of a Stöber silica‐based material towards CO(2) were evaluated for the first time. The use of Stöber silica as support is interesting for real technological applications mainly due to economic factors. Furthermore, a direct comparison between the non porous Stöber sample with an ordered porous material (based on MCM‐41 silica) allowed to evaluate the effect of the porosity on the CO(2) adsorption properties. In order to make silica materials reactive towards CO(2), they were functionalized by introducing amino groups via grafting of 3‐[2‐(2‐aminoethyl)aminoethyl]aminopropyltrimethoxysilane. After a qualitative study of the CO(2) adsorption, the quantitative determination of CO(2) adsorption capacity at 35 °C revealed that the mesoporous material is more efficient compared to the Stöber‐based one (adsorption capacity values of 0.49 and 0.58 mol/kg for Stöber‐based and mesoporous samples). However, since the difference in the adsorption capacity is only about 15 % and the Stöber‐based sample is considerably cheaper, the non‐porous sample should be considered as a favourable adsorbent material for CO(2) capture applications. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6587325/ /pubmed/31275793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.201900084 Text en ©2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers Vittoni, Chiara Gatti, Giorgio Paul, Geo Mangano, Enzo Brandani, Stefano Bisio, Chiara Marchese, Leonardo Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture |
title | Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture |
title_full | Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture |
title_fullStr | Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture |
title_full_unstemmed | Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture |
title_short | Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture |
title_sort | non‐porous versus mesoporous siliceous materials for co(2) capture |
topic | Full Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.201900084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vittonichiara nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture AT gattigiorgio nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture AT paulgeo nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture AT manganoenzo nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture AT brandanistefano nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture AT bisiochiara nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture AT marcheseleonardo nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture |