Cargando…

Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture

In this study, the adsorption properties of a Stöber silica‐based material towards CO(2) were evaluated for the first time. The use of Stöber silica as support is interesting for real technological applications mainly due to economic factors. Furthermore, a direct comparison between the non porous S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vittoni, Chiara, Gatti, Giorgio, Paul, Geo, Mangano, Enzo, Brandani, Stefano, Bisio, Chiara, Marchese, Leonardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.201900084
_version_ 1783429043883868160
author Vittoni, Chiara
Gatti, Giorgio
Paul, Geo
Mangano, Enzo
Brandani, Stefano
Bisio, Chiara
Marchese, Leonardo
author_facet Vittoni, Chiara
Gatti, Giorgio
Paul, Geo
Mangano, Enzo
Brandani, Stefano
Bisio, Chiara
Marchese, Leonardo
author_sort Vittoni, Chiara
collection PubMed
description In this study, the adsorption properties of a Stöber silica‐based material towards CO(2) were evaluated for the first time. The use of Stöber silica as support is interesting for real technological applications mainly due to economic factors. Furthermore, a direct comparison between the non porous Stöber sample with an ordered porous material (based on MCM‐41 silica) allowed to evaluate the effect of the porosity on the CO(2) adsorption properties. In order to make silica materials reactive towards CO(2), they were functionalized by introducing amino groups via grafting of 3‐[2‐(2‐aminoethyl)aminoethyl]aminopropyltrimethoxysilane. After a qualitative study of the CO(2) adsorption, the quantitative determination of CO(2) adsorption capacity at 35 °C revealed that the mesoporous material is more efficient compared to the Stöber‐based one (adsorption capacity values of 0.49 and 0.58 mol/kg for Stöber‐based and mesoporous samples). However, since the difference in the adsorption capacity is only about 15 % and the Stöber‐based sample is considerably cheaper, the non‐porous sample should be considered as a favourable adsorbent material for CO(2) capture applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6587325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65873252019-07-02 Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture Vittoni, Chiara Gatti, Giorgio Paul, Geo Mangano, Enzo Brandani, Stefano Bisio, Chiara Marchese, Leonardo ChemistryOpen Full Papers In this study, the adsorption properties of a Stöber silica‐based material towards CO(2) were evaluated for the first time. The use of Stöber silica as support is interesting for real technological applications mainly due to economic factors. Furthermore, a direct comparison between the non porous Stöber sample with an ordered porous material (based on MCM‐41 silica) allowed to evaluate the effect of the porosity on the CO(2) adsorption properties. In order to make silica materials reactive towards CO(2), they were functionalized by introducing amino groups via grafting of 3‐[2‐(2‐aminoethyl)aminoethyl]aminopropyltrimethoxysilane. After a qualitative study of the CO(2) adsorption, the quantitative determination of CO(2) adsorption capacity at 35 °C revealed that the mesoporous material is more efficient compared to the Stöber‐based one (adsorption capacity values of 0.49 and 0.58 mol/kg for Stöber‐based and mesoporous samples). However, since the difference in the adsorption capacity is only about 15 % and the Stöber‐based sample is considerably cheaper, the non‐porous sample should be considered as a favourable adsorbent material for CO(2) capture applications. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6587325/ /pubmed/31275793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.201900084 Text en ©2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Vittoni, Chiara
Gatti, Giorgio
Paul, Geo
Mangano, Enzo
Brandani, Stefano
Bisio, Chiara
Marchese, Leonardo
Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture
title Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture
title_full Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture
title_fullStr Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture
title_full_unstemmed Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture
title_short Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO(2) Capture
title_sort non‐porous versus mesoporous siliceous materials for co(2) capture
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.201900084
work_keys_str_mv AT vittonichiara nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture
AT gattigiorgio nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture
AT paulgeo nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture
AT manganoenzo nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture
AT brandanistefano nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture
AT bisiochiara nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture
AT marcheseleonardo nonporousversusmesoporoussiliceousmaterialsforco2capture