Cargando…

Evaluation of biological variation of glycated hemoglobin and glycated albumin in healthy Chinese subjects

BACKGROUND: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glycated serum albumin (GSA) are used to evaluate the mean blood glucose levels. To ensure safe clinical application of HbA1c and GSA, reliable biological variation (BV) data are required. The aim of this research was to define the BV of HbA1c and GSA empl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Libo, He, He, Zeng, Yuping, Zhang, Mei, Wang, Xia, Li, Xiaoling, Liang, Shanshan, An, Zhenmei, Huang, Hengjian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22715
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glycated serum albumin (GSA) are used to evaluate the mean blood glucose levels. To ensure safe clinical application of HbA1c and GSA, reliable biological variation (BV) data are required. The aim of this research was to define the BV of HbA1c and GSA employing stringent rules. METHODS: Blood samples were drawn from 19 healthy subjects (10 females, nine males) once per week for 5 weeks. All samples were analyzed using enzymatic method for GSA and HPLC for HbA1c. The data were assessed for outliers, normality and variance homogeneity, and coefficient of variation (by ANOVA) for BV. Sex‐stratified BV including within‐subject (CV(I)) and between‐subject (CV(G)) was defined for HbA1c and GSA. RESULTS: The following estimates for BV values for CV(I) and CV(G), respectively, were GSA: 1.23% and 4.67%, Alb: 0.75% and 3.18%, and HbA1c: 0.12% and 2.91%. The RCV of GSA was 3.61%, and HbA1c was 1.41%. And the II was 0.26 for GSA, and 0.07 for HbA1c, both of them less than 0.6. According to the 95% CI, the CV(I) of HbA1c was statistically different between females and males. And both the CV(G) of HbA1c and GSA were statistically different between females and males. CONCLUSION: All CV(I) and CV(G) estimates were lower than those reported in the online BV database. And there is a significant difference between males and females. Analytical performance specifications derived from BV of this research can be applied internationally.