Cargando…

A multicenter cross‐sectional study of episiotomy practice in Romania

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to focus attention on episiotomy practice in Romanian maternity units in order to identify factors associated with the very high rate of the procedure in Romania and to consider strategies to reduce it. METHODS: In this clustered cross‐secti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasc, Andrada, Navolan, Dan, Pușcașiu, Lucian, Ionescu, Cringu Antoniu, Szasz, Florin Adrian, Carabineanu, Adrian, Dimitriu, Mihai, Călin, Daniel, Bohilțea, Roxana, Ples, Liana, Nemescu, Dragoș
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30426613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13062
_version_ 1783429074779111424
author Pasc, Andrada
Navolan, Dan
Pușcașiu, Lucian
Ionescu, Cringu Antoniu
Szasz, Florin Adrian
Carabineanu, Adrian
Dimitriu, Mihai
Călin, Daniel
Bohilțea, Roxana
Ples, Liana
Nemescu, Dragoș
author_facet Pasc, Andrada
Navolan, Dan
Pușcașiu, Lucian
Ionescu, Cringu Antoniu
Szasz, Florin Adrian
Carabineanu, Adrian
Dimitriu, Mihai
Călin, Daniel
Bohilțea, Roxana
Ples, Liana
Nemescu, Dragoș
author_sort Pasc, Andrada
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to focus attention on episiotomy practice in Romanian maternity units in order to identify factors associated with the very high rate of the procedure in Romania and to consider strategies to reduce it. METHODS: In this clustered cross‐sectional study, a total of 11 863 patients were recorded in eight Romanian maternity units to assess the prevalence of episiotomy. A random effects Poisson model was used to estimate the prevalence rate in univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: Among the 11 863 patients included for analysis, 8475 (71.4%) had an episiotomy. The prevalence of episiotomy was 92.7% for the first vaginal birth, 73.2% for the second vaginal birth, and 35% for the third vaginal birth. The overall rate of suturing was higher than the episiotomy rate for all patients (total rate 79.2%). The likelihood of exiting the maternity ward with an intact perineum after the first vaginal birth was less than 5% at the first vaginal birth. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, routine episiotomy is the norm in Romanian maternity units, with episiotomy rates among the highest in Europe. Episiotomy use is mainly driven by local professional norms, experiences, previous training, and practitioners' decisions rather than evidence, guidelines, or variations in patient needs at the time of vaginal birth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6587480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65874802019-07-02 A multicenter cross‐sectional study of episiotomy practice in Romania Pasc, Andrada Navolan, Dan Pușcașiu, Lucian Ionescu, Cringu Antoniu Szasz, Florin Adrian Carabineanu, Adrian Dimitriu, Mihai Călin, Daniel Bohilțea, Roxana Ples, Liana Nemescu, Dragoș J Eval Clin Pract Original Papers RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to focus attention on episiotomy practice in Romanian maternity units in order to identify factors associated with the very high rate of the procedure in Romania and to consider strategies to reduce it. METHODS: In this clustered cross‐sectional study, a total of 11 863 patients were recorded in eight Romanian maternity units to assess the prevalence of episiotomy. A random effects Poisson model was used to estimate the prevalence rate in univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: Among the 11 863 patients included for analysis, 8475 (71.4%) had an episiotomy. The prevalence of episiotomy was 92.7% for the first vaginal birth, 73.2% for the second vaginal birth, and 35% for the third vaginal birth. The overall rate of suturing was higher than the episiotomy rate for all patients (total rate 79.2%). The likelihood of exiting the maternity ward with an intact perineum after the first vaginal birth was less than 5% at the first vaginal birth. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, routine episiotomy is the norm in Romanian maternity units, with episiotomy rates among the highest in Europe. Episiotomy use is mainly driven by local professional norms, experiences, previous training, and practitioners' decisions rather than evidence, guidelines, or variations in patient needs at the time of vaginal birth. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-13 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6587480/ /pubmed/30426613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13062 Text en © 2018 The Authors Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Pasc, Andrada
Navolan, Dan
Pușcașiu, Lucian
Ionescu, Cringu Antoniu
Szasz, Florin Adrian
Carabineanu, Adrian
Dimitriu, Mihai
Călin, Daniel
Bohilțea, Roxana
Ples, Liana
Nemescu, Dragoș
A multicenter cross‐sectional study of episiotomy practice in Romania
title A multicenter cross‐sectional study of episiotomy practice in Romania
title_full A multicenter cross‐sectional study of episiotomy practice in Romania
title_fullStr A multicenter cross‐sectional study of episiotomy practice in Romania
title_full_unstemmed A multicenter cross‐sectional study of episiotomy practice in Romania
title_short A multicenter cross‐sectional study of episiotomy practice in Romania
title_sort multicenter cross‐sectional study of episiotomy practice in romania
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30426613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13062
work_keys_str_mv AT pascandrada amulticentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT navolandan amulticentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT puscasiulucian amulticentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT ionescucringuantoniu amulticentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT szaszflorinadrian amulticentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT carabineanuadrian amulticentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT dimitriumihai amulticentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT calindaniel amulticentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT bohiltearoxana amulticentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT plesliana amulticentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT nemescudragos amulticentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT pascandrada multicentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT navolandan multicentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT puscasiulucian multicentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT ionescucringuantoniu multicentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT szaszflorinadrian multicentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT carabineanuadrian multicentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT dimitriumihai multicentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT calindaniel multicentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT bohiltearoxana multicentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT plesliana multicentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania
AT nemescudragos multicentercrosssectionalstudyofepisiotomypracticeinromania