Cargando…

Assessment of fluid responsiveness by inferior vena cava diameter variation in post‐pneumonectomy patients

AIM: First, the inferior vena cava dilatation index (DIVC) was measured by ultrasound, and then the reliability of DIVC as an indicator to predict volume responsiveness in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation after pneumonectomy was evaluated. METHODS: Pulse indicator continuous cardiac output...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yan, Jiang, Yinghou, Wu, Hongning, Wang, Runfeng, Wang, Ying, Du, Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30338549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/echo.14172
_version_ 1783429078289743872
author Wang, Yan
Jiang, Yinghou
Wu, Hongning
Wang, Runfeng
Wang, Ying
Du, Cheng
author_facet Wang, Yan
Jiang, Yinghou
Wu, Hongning
Wang, Runfeng
Wang, Ying
Du, Cheng
author_sort Wang, Yan
collection PubMed
description AIM: First, the inferior vena cava dilatation index (DIVC) was measured by ultrasound, and then the reliability of DIVC as an indicator to predict volume responsiveness in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation after pneumonectomy was evaluated. METHODS: Pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (Picco) as gold standard was performed to sedated mechanically ventilated post‐pneumonectomy patients in intensive care unit of Nanjing Thoracic Hospital from August 2014 to December 2016. Meanwhile, ultrasound measurement to inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter at the end inspiration (D (max)) and the end of expiration (D (min)) was performed. DIVC = (D (max) − D (min))/D (min). Above values were recorded at baseline and then after fluid resuscitation challenge (7 mL/kg hydroxyethyl starch). An increase in cardiac index of more than 15% was used as the standard for fluid responsiveness. Patients were divided into responsive group and non‐responsive group. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was then used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of DIVC in predicting fluid responsiveness after pneumonectomy. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled. 10 patients were divided into responsive group and eight in non‐responsive group. DIVC in responsive group was significantly higher than in non‐responsive group (P < 0.01). By setting DIVC ≥ 15% as a measure of fluid responsiveness, sensitivity was 81.8% and specificity was 85.7%. CONCLUSION: DIVC is a reliable indicator of capacity responsiveness in mechanically ventilated post‐pneumonectomy patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6587495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65874952019-07-02 Assessment of fluid responsiveness by inferior vena cava diameter variation in post‐pneumonectomy patients Wang, Yan Jiang, Yinghou Wu, Hongning Wang, Runfeng Wang, Ying Du, Cheng Echocardiography Original Investigations AIM: First, the inferior vena cava dilatation index (DIVC) was measured by ultrasound, and then the reliability of DIVC as an indicator to predict volume responsiveness in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation after pneumonectomy was evaluated. METHODS: Pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (Picco) as gold standard was performed to sedated mechanically ventilated post‐pneumonectomy patients in intensive care unit of Nanjing Thoracic Hospital from August 2014 to December 2016. Meanwhile, ultrasound measurement to inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter at the end inspiration (D (max)) and the end of expiration (D (min)) was performed. DIVC = (D (max) − D (min))/D (min). Above values were recorded at baseline and then after fluid resuscitation challenge (7 mL/kg hydroxyethyl starch). An increase in cardiac index of more than 15% was used as the standard for fluid responsiveness. Patients were divided into responsive group and non‐responsive group. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was then used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of DIVC in predicting fluid responsiveness after pneumonectomy. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled. 10 patients were divided into responsive group and eight in non‐responsive group. DIVC in responsive group was significantly higher than in non‐responsive group (P < 0.01). By setting DIVC ≥ 15% as a measure of fluid responsiveness, sensitivity was 81.8% and specificity was 85.7%. CONCLUSION: DIVC is a reliable indicator of capacity responsiveness in mechanically ventilated post‐pneumonectomy patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-18 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6587495/ /pubmed/30338549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/echo.14172 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Echocardiography Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Investigations
Wang, Yan
Jiang, Yinghou
Wu, Hongning
Wang, Runfeng
Wang, Ying
Du, Cheng
Assessment of fluid responsiveness by inferior vena cava diameter variation in post‐pneumonectomy patients
title Assessment of fluid responsiveness by inferior vena cava diameter variation in post‐pneumonectomy patients
title_full Assessment of fluid responsiveness by inferior vena cava diameter variation in post‐pneumonectomy patients
title_fullStr Assessment of fluid responsiveness by inferior vena cava diameter variation in post‐pneumonectomy patients
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of fluid responsiveness by inferior vena cava diameter variation in post‐pneumonectomy patients
title_short Assessment of fluid responsiveness by inferior vena cava diameter variation in post‐pneumonectomy patients
title_sort assessment of fluid responsiveness by inferior vena cava diameter variation in post‐pneumonectomy patients
topic Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30338549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/echo.14172
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyan assessmentoffluidresponsivenessbyinferiorvenacavadiametervariationinpostpneumonectomypatients
AT jiangyinghou assessmentoffluidresponsivenessbyinferiorvenacavadiametervariationinpostpneumonectomypatients
AT wuhongning assessmentoffluidresponsivenessbyinferiorvenacavadiametervariationinpostpneumonectomypatients
AT wangrunfeng assessmentoffluidresponsivenessbyinferiorvenacavadiametervariationinpostpneumonectomypatients
AT wangying assessmentoffluidresponsivenessbyinferiorvenacavadiametervariationinpostpneumonectomypatients
AT ducheng assessmentoffluidresponsivenessbyinferiorvenacavadiametervariationinpostpneumonectomypatients