Cargando…

Evaluation of the depiction ability of the microanatomy of the temporal bone in quarter-detector CT: Model-based iterative reconstruction vs hybrid iterative reconstruction

Little is known regarding differences between model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) in temporal bone computed tomography (CT). This study compared the ability to depict microstructures in temporal bone in quarter-detector CT (QDCT) between MBIR and HIR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurokawa, Ryo, Maeda, Eriko, Mori, Harushi, Amemiya, Shiori, Sato, Jiro, Ino, Kenji, Torigoe, Rumiko, Abe, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31192940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015991
_version_ 1783429102897725440
author Kurokawa, Ryo
Maeda, Eriko
Mori, Harushi
Amemiya, Shiori
Sato, Jiro
Ino, Kenji
Torigoe, Rumiko
Abe, Osamu
author_facet Kurokawa, Ryo
Maeda, Eriko
Mori, Harushi
Amemiya, Shiori
Sato, Jiro
Ino, Kenji
Torigoe, Rumiko
Abe, Osamu
author_sort Kurokawa, Ryo
collection PubMed
description Little is known regarding differences between model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) in temporal bone computed tomography (CT). This study compared the ability to depict microstructures in temporal bone in quarter-detector CT (QDCT) between MBIR and HIR. Sixty-two temporal bones in 31 consecutive adult patients who underwent QDCT were included. Reconstruction was performed with Forward projected model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion (FIRST) BONE mild mode and Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR3D) enhanced mild mode. Imaging quality was graded for 3 microstructures (spiral osseous lamina, tympanic membrane, and singular canal). Spiral osseous lamina was significantly well-delineated in the AIDR3D enhanced group, compared with the FIRST group. In nearly all cases with FIRST, spiral osseous lamina was poorly defined. Although there was no significant difference, depiction of the tympanic membrane and singular canal tended to be better with AIDR3D enhanced mode. Routine reconstruction for preoperative temporal bone CT should be performed with HIR, rather than MBIR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6587614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65876142019-06-24 Evaluation of the depiction ability of the microanatomy of the temporal bone in quarter-detector CT: Model-based iterative reconstruction vs hybrid iterative reconstruction Kurokawa, Ryo Maeda, Eriko Mori, Harushi Amemiya, Shiori Sato, Jiro Ino, Kenji Torigoe, Rumiko Abe, Osamu Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Little is known regarding differences between model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) in temporal bone computed tomography (CT). This study compared the ability to depict microstructures in temporal bone in quarter-detector CT (QDCT) between MBIR and HIR. Sixty-two temporal bones in 31 consecutive adult patients who underwent QDCT were included. Reconstruction was performed with Forward projected model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion (FIRST) BONE mild mode and Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR3D) enhanced mild mode. Imaging quality was graded for 3 microstructures (spiral osseous lamina, tympanic membrane, and singular canal). Spiral osseous lamina was significantly well-delineated in the AIDR3D enhanced group, compared with the FIRST group. In nearly all cases with FIRST, spiral osseous lamina was poorly defined. Although there was no significant difference, depiction of the tympanic membrane and singular canal tended to be better with AIDR3D enhanced mode. Routine reconstruction for preoperative temporal bone CT should be performed with HIR, rather than MBIR. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6587614/ /pubmed/31192940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015991 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Kurokawa, Ryo
Maeda, Eriko
Mori, Harushi
Amemiya, Shiori
Sato, Jiro
Ino, Kenji
Torigoe, Rumiko
Abe, Osamu
Evaluation of the depiction ability of the microanatomy of the temporal bone in quarter-detector CT: Model-based iterative reconstruction vs hybrid iterative reconstruction
title Evaluation of the depiction ability of the microanatomy of the temporal bone in quarter-detector CT: Model-based iterative reconstruction vs hybrid iterative reconstruction
title_full Evaluation of the depiction ability of the microanatomy of the temporal bone in quarter-detector CT: Model-based iterative reconstruction vs hybrid iterative reconstruction
title_fullStr Evaluation of the depiction ability of the microanatomy of the temporal bone in quarter-detector CT: Model-based iterative reconstruction vs hybrid iterative reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the depiction ability of the microanatomy of the temporal bone in quarter-detector CT: Model-based iterative reconstruction vs hybrid iterative reconstruction
title_short Evaluation of the depiction ability of the microanatomy of the temporal bone in quarter-detector CT: Model-based iterative reconstruction vs hybrid iterative reconstruction
title_sort evaluation of the depiction ability of the microanatomy of the temporal bone in quarter-detector ct: model-based iterative reconstruction vs hybrid iterative reconstruction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31192940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015991
work_keys_str_mv AT kurokawaryo evaluationofthedepictionabilityofthemicroanatomyofthetemporalboneinquarterdetectorctmodelbasediterativereconstructionvshybriditerativereconstruction
AT maedaeriko evaluationofthedepictionabilityofthemicroanatomyofthetemporalboneinquarterdetectorctmodelbasediterativereconstructionvshybriditerativereconstruction
AT moriharushi evaluationofthedepictionabilityofthemicroanatomyofthetemporalboneinquarterdetectorctmodelbasediterativereconstructionvshybriditerativereconstruction
AT amemiyashiori evaluationofthedepictionabilityofthemicroanatomyofthetemporalboneinquarterdetectorctmodelbasediterativereconstructionvshybriditerativereconstruction
AT satojiro evaluationofthedepictionabilityofthemicroanatomyofthetemporalboneinquarterdetectorctmodelbasediterativereconstructionvshybriditerativereconstruction
AT inokenji evaluationofthedepictionabilityofthemicroanatomyofthetemporalboneinquarterdetectorctmodelbasediterativereconstructionvshybriditerativereconstruction
AT torigoerumiko evaluationofthedepictionabilityofthemicroanatomyofthetemporalboneinquarterdetectorctmodelbasediterativereconstructionvshybriditerativereconstruction
AT abeosamu evaluationofthedepictionabilityofthemicroanatomyofthetemporalboneinquarterdetectorctmodelbasediterativereconstructionvshybriditerativereconstruction