Cargando…
Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer
BACKGROUND: Colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications in rectal cancer surgery due to its negative impact on the overall as well as cancer-specific survival. Two-row stapling technique has become standard in low anterior resections (LARs), but has neither alleviate...
Autores principales: | Nekliudov, Nikita A., Tsarkov, Petr V., Tulina, Inna A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31192938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015978 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study
por: Wang, Tongtong, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts
por: Catarci, Marco, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Two-stage ordering for unsymmetric parallel row-by-row frontal solvers
por: Scott, J A
Publicado: (2000) -
Reversing the row order for the row-by-row frontal method
por: Reid, J K, et al.
Publicado: (1999) -
Comparison of standard 4-row versus 6-row 3-D linear cutter stapler in creation of gastrointestinal system anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial
por: Sozutek, Alper, et al.
Publicado: (2012)