Cargando…

Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs

This study assessed whether five Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies in Europe were more negative about drugs with a Conditional Marketing Authorization (CMA) that are approved without controlled studies compared to CMA drugs that are approved based on controlled studies. The HTA recommendatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vreman, Rick A., Bouvy, Jacoline C., Bloem, Lourens T., Hövels, Anke M., Mantel‐Teeuwisse, Aukje K., Leufkens, Hubert G.M., Goettsch, Wim G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30300938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1251
_version_ 1783429118515216384
author Vreman, Rick A.
Bouvy, Jacoline C.
Bloem, Lourens T.
Hövels, Anke M.
Mantel‐Teeuwisse, Aukje K.
Leufkens, Hubert G.M.
Goettsch, Wim G.
author_facet Vreman, Rick A.
Bouvy, Jacoline C.
Bloem, Lourens T.
Hövels, Anke M.
Mantel‐Teeuwisse, Aukje K.
Leufkens, Hubert G.M.
Goettsch, Wim G.
author_sort Vreman, Rick A.
collection PubMed
description This study assessed whether five Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies in Europe were more negative about drugs with a Conditional Marketing Authorization (CMA) that are approved without controlled studies compared to CMA drugs that are approved based on controlled studies. The HTA recommendations were categorized into positive, restricted, and negative. A total of 92 HTA recommendations were available for 27 drugs. Thirty of 62 (48%) and 17 of 30 (57%) of the recommendations were negative for drugs with and without controlled studies, respectively. Overall, only 12 (13%) recommendations were positive. In all jurisdictions, recommendations between drugs with and drugs without controlled data were comparable, which suggests that the presence of controlled data is not decisive in HTA evaluations. The small proportion of unrestricted positive recommendations highlights difficulties with recommending the drugs in this cohort, which may be caused by scientific uncertainty or other factors. Earlier collaboration between stakeholders is advised in order to improve patient access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6587700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65877002019-07-08 Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs Vreman, Rick A. Bouvy, Jacoline C. Bloem, Lourens T. Hövels, Anke M. Mantel‐Teeuwisse, Aukje K. Leufkens, Hubert G.M. Goettsch, Wim G. Clin Pharmacol Ther Research This study assessed whether five Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies in Europe were more negative about drugs with a Conditional Marketing Authorization (CMA) that are approved without controlled studies compared to CMA drugs that are approved based on controlled studies. The HTA recommendations were categorized into positive, restricted, and negative. A total of 92 HTA recommendations were available for 27 drugs. Thirty of 62 (48%) and 17 of 30 (57%) of the recommendations were negative for drugs with and without controlled studies, respectively. Overall, only 12 (13%) recommendations were positive. In all jurisdictions, recommendations between drugs with and drugs without controlled data were comparable, which suggests that the presence of controlled data is not decisive in HTA evaluations. The small proportion of unrestricted positive recommendations highlights difficulties with recommending the drugs in this cohort, which may be caused by scientific uncertainty or other factors. Earlier collaboration between stakeholders is advised in order to improve patient access. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-08 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6587700/ /pubmed/30300938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1251 Text en © 2018 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Vreman, Rick A.
Bouvy, Jacoline C.
Bloem, Lourens T.
Hövels, Anke M.
Mantel‐Teeuwisse, Aukje K.
Leufkens, Hubert G.M.
Goettsch, Wim G.
Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs
title Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs
title_full Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs
title_fullStr Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs
title_full_unstemmed Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs
title_short Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs
title_sort weighing of evidence by health technology assessment bodies: retrospective study of reimbursement recommendations for conditionally approved drugs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30300938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1251
work_keys_str_mv AT vremanricka weighingofevidencebyhealthtechnologyassessmentbodiesretrospectivestudyofreimbursementrecommendationsforconditionallyapproveddrugs
AT bouvyjacolinec weighingofevidencebyhealthtechnologyassessmentbodiesretrospectivestudyofreimbursementrecommendationsforconditionallyapproveddrugs
AT bloemlourenst weighingofevidencebyhealthtechnologyassessmentbodiesretrospectivestudyofreimbursementrecommendationsforconditionallyapproveddrugs
AT hovelsankem weighingofevidencebyhealthtechnologyassessmentbodiesretrospectivestudyofreimbursementrecommendationsforconditionallyapproveddrugs
AT mantelteeuwisseaukjek weighingofevidencebyhealthtechnologyassessmentbodiesretrospectivestudyofreimbursementrecommendationsforconditionallyapproveddrugs
AT leufkenshubertgm weighingofevidencebyhealthtechnologyassessmentbodiesretrospectivestudyofreimbursementrecommendationsforconditionallyapproveddrugs
AT goettschwimg weighingofevidencebyhealthtechnologyassessmentbodiesretrospectivestudyofreimbursementrecommendationsforconditionallyapproveddrugs