Cargando…

Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach

PURPOSE: To develop a method for retrospective artifact elimination of MRS data. This retrospective method was based on an approach that combines jackknife analyses with the correlation of spectral windows, and therefore termed “JKC.” METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers performed 3 separate measureme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tapper, Sofie, Tisell, Anders, Helms, Gunther, Lundberg, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30417930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27590
_version_ 1783429141292384256
author Tapper, Sofie
Tisell, Anders
Helms, Gunther
Lundberg, Peter
author_facet Tapper, Sofie
Tisell, Anders
Helms, Gunther
Lundberg, Peter
author_sort Tapper, Sofie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a method for retrospective artifact elimination of MRS data. This retrospective method was based on an approach that combines jackknife analyses with the correlation of spectral windows, and therefore termed “JKC.” METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers performed 3 separate measurement protocols using a 3T MR system. One protocol consisted of 2 cerebellar MEGA‐PRESS measurements: 1 reference and 1 measurement including head movements. One‐third of the artifact‐influenced datasets were treated as training data for the implementation the JKC method, and the rest were used for validation. RESULTS: The implemented JKC method correctly characterized most of the validation data. Additionally, after elimination of the detected artifacts, the resulting concentrations were much closer to those computed for the reference datasets. Moreover, when the JKC method was applied to the reference data, the estimated concentrations were not affected, compared with standard averaging. CONCLUSION: The implemented JKC method can be applied without any extra cost to MRS data, regardless of whether the dataset has been contaminated by artifacts. Furthermore, the results indicate that the JKC method could be used as a quality control of a dataset, or as an indication of whether a shift in voxel placement has occurred during the measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6587795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65877952019-07-02 Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach Tapper, Sofie Tisell, Anders Helms, Gunther Lundberg, Peter Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Spectroscopic Methodology PURPOSE: To develop a method for retrospective artifact elimination of MRS data. This retrospective method was based on an approach that combines jackknife analyses with the correlation of spectral windows, and therefore termed “JKC.” METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers performed 3 separate measurement protocols using a 3T MR system. One protocol consisted of 2 cerebellar MEGA‐PRESS measurements: 1 reference and 1 measurement including head movements. One‐third of the artifact‐influenced datasets were treated as training data for the implementation the JKC method, and the rest were used for validation. RESULTS: The implemented JKC method correctly characterized most of the validation data. Additionally, after elimination of the detected artifacts, the resulting concentrations were much closer to those computed for the reference datasets. Moreover, when the JKC method was applied to the reference data, the estimated concentrations were not affected, compared with standard averaging. CONCLUSION: The implemented JKC method can be applied without any extra cost to MRS data, regardless of whether the dataset has been contaminated by artifacts. Furthermore, the results indicate that the JKC method could be used as a quality control of a dataset, or as an indication of whether a shift in voxel placement has occurred during the measurement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-12 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6587795/ /pubmed/30417930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27590 Text en © 2018 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Full Papers—Spectroscopic Methodology
Tapper, Sofie
Tisell, Anders
Helms, Gunther
Lundberg, Peter
Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach
title Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach
title_full Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach
title_fullStr Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach
title_short Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach
title_sort retrospective artifact elimination in mega‐press using a correlation approach
topic Full Papers—Spectroscopic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30417930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27590
work_keys_str_mv AT tappersofie retrospectiveartifacteliminationinmegapressusingacorrelationapproach
AT tisellanders retrospectiveartifacteliminationinmegapressusingacorrelationapproach
AT helmsgunther retrospectiveartifacteliminationinmegapressusingacorrelationapproach
AT lundbergpeter retrospectiveartifacteliminationinmegapressusingacorrelationapproach