Cargando…
Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach
PURPOSE: To develop a method for retrospective artifact elimination of MRS data. This retrospective method was based on an approach that combines jackknife analyses with the correlation of spectral windows, and therefore termed “JKC.” METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers performed 3 separate measureme...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30417930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27590 |
_version_ | 1783429141292384256 |
---|---|
author | Tapper, Sofie Tisell, Anders Helms, Gunther Lundberg, Peter |
author_facet | Tapper, Sofie Tisell, Anders Helms, Gunther Lundberg, Peter |
author_sort | Tapper, Sofie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop a method for retrospective artifact elimination of MRS data. This retrospective method was based on an approach that combines jackknife analyses with the correlation of spectral windows, and therefore termed “JKC.” METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers performed 3 separate measurement protocols using a 3T MR system. One protocol consisted of 2 cerebellar MEGA‐PRESS measurements: 1 reference and 1 measurement including head movements. One‐third of the artifact‐influenced datasets were treated as training data for the implementation the JKC method, and the rest were used for validation. RESULTS: The implemented JKC method correctly characterized most of the validation data. Additionally, after elimination of the detected artifacts, the resulting concentrations were much closer to those computed for the reference datasets. Moreover, when the JKC method was applied to the reference data, the estimated concentrations were not affected, compared with standard averaging. CONCLUSION: The implemented JKC method can be applied without any extra cost to MRS data, regardless of whether the dataset has been contaminated by artifacts. Furthermore, the results indicate that the JKC method could be used as a quality control of a dataset, or as an indication of whether a shift in voxel placement has occurred during the measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6587795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65877952019-07-02 Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach Tapper, Sofie Tisell, Anders Helms, Gunther Lundberg, Peter Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Spectroscopic Methodology PURPOSE: To develop a method for retrospective artifact elimination of MRS data. This retrospective method was based on an approach that combines jackknife analyses with the correlation of spectral windows, and therefore termed “JKC.” METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers performed 3 separate measurement protocols using a 3T MR system. One protocol consisted of 2 cerebellar MEGA‐PRESS measurements: 1 reference and 1 measurement including head movements. One‐third of the artifact‐influenced datasets were treated as training data for the implementation the JKC method, and the rest were used for validation. RESULTS: The implemented JKC method correctly characterized most of the validation data. Additionally, after elimination of the detected artifacts, the resulting concentrations were much closer to those computed for the reference datasets. Moreover, when the JKC method was applied to the reference data, the estimated concentrations were not affected, compared with standard averaging. CONCLUSION: The implemented JKC method can be applied without any extra cost to MRS data, regardless of whether the dataset has been contaminated by artifacts. Furthermore, the results indicate that the JKC method could be used as a quality control of a dataset, or as an indication of whether a shift in voxel placement has occurred during the measurement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-12 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6587795/ /pubmed/30417930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27590 Text en © 2018 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers—Spectroscopic Methodology Tapper, Sofie Tisell, Anders Helms, Gunther Lundberg, Peter Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach |
title | Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach |
title_full | Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach |
title_fullStr | Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach |
title_short | Retrospective artifact elimination in MEGA‐PRESS using a correlation approach |
title_sort | retrospective artifact elimination in mega‐press using a correlation approach |
topic | Full Papers—Spectroscopic Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30417930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27590 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tappersofie retrospectiveartifacteliminationinmegapressusingacorrelationapproach AT tisellanders retrospectiveartifacteliminationinmegapressusingacorrelationapproach AT helmsgunther retrospectiveartifacteliminationinmegapressusingacorrelationapproach AT lundbergpeter retrospectiveartifacteliminationinmegapressusingacorrelationapproach |