Cargando…

Investigation of IGF1, IGF2BP2, and IGFBP3 variants with lymph node status and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma risk

Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EGJA) may be associated with obesity and overweight. Thus, any variant in energy metabolism–related gene may influence the development of EGJA. In this study, we recruited 720 EGJA cases and 1541 noncancer controls. We selected IGF2BP2 rs4402960 G > T, rs1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Weifeng, Chen, Shuchen, Liu, Jun, Liu, Chao, Wang, Yafeng, Kang, Mingqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30335898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcb.27834
_version_ 1783429153211547648
author Tang, Weifeng
Chen, Shuchen
Liu, Jun
Liu, Chao
Wang, Yafeng
Kang, Mingqiang
author_facet Tang, Weifeng
Chen, Shuchen
Liu, Jun
Liu, Chao
Wang, Yafeng
Kang, Mingqiang
author_sort Tang, Weifeng
collection PubMed
description Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EGJA) may be associated with obesity and overweight. Thus, any variant in energy metabolism–related gene may influence the development of EGJA. In this study, we recruited 720 EGJA cases and 1541 noncancer controls. We selected IGF2BP2 rs4402960 G > T, rs1470579 A > C, IGF1 rs5742612 A > G and IGFBP3 rs3110697 G > A, rs2270628 C > T and rs6953668 G > A loci and assessed the relationship of these polymorphisms with lymph node status and susceptibility of EGJA. We found that IGF2BP2 rs1470579 A > C and IGFBP3 rs6953668 G > A polymorphisms were associated with the decreased risk of EGJA ( IGF2BP2 rs1470579: CC vs AA: adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.43‐0.98, P = 0.041 and CC vs AA/AC: adjusted OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.41‐0.93, P = 0.021 and IGFBP3 rs6953668: GA vs GG: adjusted OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47‐0.93, P = 0.019 and GA/AA vs GG: adjusted OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48‐0.95, P = 0.026). However, we also found that IGF1 rs5742612 A > G polymorphism increased the risk of LNM among patients with EGJA (GG vs AA: adjusted OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.02‐3.46, P = 0.042 and GG vs AA/AG: adjusted OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.06‐3.47, P = 0.032). This study suggests that IGF2BP2 rs1470579 A > C and IGFBP3 rs6953668 G > A polymorphisms may decrease genetic susceptibility to EGJA in eastern Chinese Han population. In addition, our findings also indicate that IGF1 rs5742612 A > G polymorphism may increase the susceptibility of LNM among patients with EGJA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6587846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65878462019-07-02 Investigation of IGF1, IGF2BP2, and IGFBP3 variants with lymph node status and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma risk Tang, Weifeng Chen, Shuchen Liu, Jun Liu, Chao Wang, Yafeng Kang, Mingqiang J Cell Biochem Research Articles Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EGJA) may be associated with obesity and overweight. Thus, any variant in energy metabolism–related gene may influence the development of EGJA. In this study, we recruited 720 EGJA cases and 1541 noncancer controls. We selected IGF2BP2 rs4402960 G > T, rs1470579 A > C, IGF1 rs5742612 A > G and IGFBP3 rs3110697 G > A, rs2270628 C > T and rs6953668 G > A loci and assessed the relationship of these polymorphisms with lymph node status and susceptibility of EGJA. We found that IGF2BP2 rs1470579 A > C and IGFBP3 rs6953668 G > A polymorphisms were associated with the decreased risk of EGJA ( IGF2BP2 rs1470579: CC vs AA: adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.43‐0.98, P = 0.041 and CC vs AA/AC: adjusted OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.41‐0.93, P = 0.021 and IGFBP3 rs6953668: GA vs GG: adjusted OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47‐0.93, P = 0.019 and GA/AA vs GG: adjusted OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48‐0.95, P = 0.026). However, we also found that IGF1 rs5742612 A > G polymorphism increased the risk of LNM among patients with EGJA (GG vs AA: adjusted OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.02‐3.46, P = 0.042 and GG vs AA/AG: adjusted OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.06‐3.47, P = 0.032). This study suggests that IGF2BP2 rs1470579 A > C and IGFBP3 rs6953668 G > A polymorphisms may decrease genetic susceptibility to EGJA in eastern Chinese Han population. In addition, our findings also indicate that IGF1 rs5742612 A > G polymorphism may increase the susceptibility of LNM among patients with EGJA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-18 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6587846/ /pubmed/30335898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcb.27834 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Tang, Weifeng
Chen, Shuchen
Liu, Jun
Liu, Chao
Wang, Yafeng
Kang, Mingqiang
Investigation of IGF1, IGF2BP2, and IGFBP3 variants with lymph node status and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma risk
title Investigation of IGF1, IGF2BP2, and IGFBP3 variants with lymph node status and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma risk
title_full Investigation of IGF1, IGF2BP2, and IGFBP3 variants with lymph node status and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma risk
title_fullStr Investigation of IGF1, IGF2BP2, and IGFBP3 variants with lymph node status and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma risk
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of IGF1, IGF2BP2, and IGFBP3 variants with lymph node status and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma risk
title_short Investigation of IGF1, IGF2BP2, and IGFBP3 variants with lymph node status and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma risk
title_sort investigation of igf1, igf2bp2, and igfbp3 variants with lymph node status and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma risk
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30335898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcb.27834
work_keys_str_mv AT tangweifeng investigationofigf1igf2bp2andigfbp3variantswithlymphnodestatusandesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomarisk
AT chenshuchen investigationofigf1igf2bp2andigfbp3variantswithlymphnodestatusandesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomarisk
AT liujun investigationofigf1igf2bp2andigfbp3variantswithlymphnodestatusandesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomarisk
AT liuchao investigationofigf1igf2bp2andigfbp3variantswithlymphnodestatusandesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomarisk
AT wangyafeng investigationofigf1igf2bp2andigfbp3variantswithlymphnodestatusandesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomarisk
AT kangmingqiang investigationofigf1igf2bp2andigfbp3variantswithlymphnodestatusandesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomarisk