Cargando…
Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets
Quality control (QC) of brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) is an important process requiring a significant amount of manual inspection. Major artifacts, such as severe subject motion, are easy to identify to naïve observers but lack automated identification tools. Clinical trials involving motion...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24449 |
_version_ | 1783429184764248064 |
---|---|
author | Ding, Yang Suffren, Sabrina Bellec, Pierre Lodygensky, Gregory A. |
author_facet | Ding, Yang Suffren, Sabrina Bellec, Pierre Lodygensky, Gregory A. |
author_sort | Ding, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quality control (QC) of brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) is an important process requiring a significant amount of manual inspection. Major artifacts, such as severe subject motion, are easy to identify to naïve observers but lack automated identification tools. Clinical trials involving motion‐prone neonates typically pool data to obtain sufficient power, and automated quality control protocols are especially important to safeguard data quality. Current study tested an open source method to detect major artifacts among 2D neonatal MRI via supervised machine learning. A total of 1,020 two‐dimensional transverse T2‐weighted MRI images of preterm newborns were examined and classified as either QC Pass or QC Fail. Then 70 features across focus, texture, noise, and natural scene statistics categories were extracted from each image. Several different classifiers were trained and their performance was compared with subjective rating as the gold standard. We repeated the rating process again to examine the stability of the rating and classification. When tested via 10‐fold cross validation, the random undersampling and adaboost ensemble (RUSBoost) method achieved the best overall performance for QC Fail images with 85% positive predictive value along with 75% sensitivity. Similar classification performance was observed in the analyses of the repeated subjective rating. Current results served as a proof of concept for predicting images that fail quality control using no‐reference objective image features. We also highlighted the importance of evaluating results beyond mere accuracy as a performance measure for machine learning in imbalanced group settings due to larger proportion of QC Pass quality images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6588009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65880092019-07-02 Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets Ding, Yang Suffren, Sabrina Bellec, Pierre Lodygensky, Gregory A. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Quality control (QC) of brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) is an important process requiring a significant amount of manual inspection. Major artifacts, such as severe subject motion, are easy to identify to naïve observers but lack automated identification tools. Clinical trials involving motion‐prone neonates typically pool data to obtain sufficient power, and automated quality control protocols are especially important to safeguard data quality. Current study tested an open source method to detect major artifacts among 2D neonatal MRI via supervised machine learning. A total of 1,020 two‐dimensional transverse T2‐weighted MRI images of preterm newborns were examined and classified as either QC Pass or QC Fail. Then 70 features across focus, texture, noise, and natural scene statistics categories were extracted from each image. Several different classifiers were trained and their performance was compared with subjective rating as the gold standard. We repeated the rating process again to examine the stability of the rating and classification. When tested via 10‐fold cross validation, the random undersampling and adaboost ensemble (RUSBoost) method achieved the best overall performance for QC Fail images with 85% positive predictive value along with 75% sensitivity. Similar classification performance was observed in the analyses of the repeated subjective rating. Current results served as a proof of concept for predicting images that fail quality control using no‐reference objective image features. We also highlighted the importance of evaluating results beyond mere accuracy as a performance measure for machine learning in imbalanced group settings due to larger proportion of QC Pass quality images. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6588009/ /pubmed/30467922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24449 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Ding, Yang Suffren, Sabrina Bellec, Pierre Lodygensky, Gregory A. Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets |
title | Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets |
title_full | Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets |
title_fullStr | Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets |
title_full_unstemmed | Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets |
title_short | Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets |
title_sort | supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dingyang supervisedmachinelearningqualitycontrolformagneticresonanceartifactsinneonataldatasets AT suffrensabrina supervisedmachinelearningqualitycontrolformagneticresonanceartifactsinneonataldatasets AT bellecpierre supervisedmachinelearningqualitycontrolformagneticresonanceartifactsinneonataldatasets AT lodygenskygregorya supervisedmachinelearningqualitycontrolformagneticresonanceartifactsinneonataldatasets |