Cargando…

Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets

Quality control (QC) of brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) is an important process requiring a significant amount of manual inspection. Major artifacts, such as severe subject motion, are easy to identify to naïve observers but lack automated identification tools. Clinical trials involving motion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Yang, Suffren, Sabrina, Bellec, Pierre, Lodygensky, Gregory A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24449
_version_ 1783429184764248064
author Ding, Yang
Suffren, Sabrina
Bellec, Pierre
Lodygensky, Gregory A.
author_facet Ding, Yang
Suffren, Sabrina
Bellec, Pierre
Lodygensky, Gregory A.
author_sort Ding, Yang
collection PubMed
description Quality control (QC) of brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) is an important process requiring a significant amount of manual inspection. Major artifacts, such as severe subject motion, are easy to identify to naïve observers but lack automated identification tools. Clinical trials involving motion‐prone neonates typically pool data to obtain sufficient power, and automated quality control protocols are especially important to safeguard data quality. Current study tested an open source method to detect major artifacts among 2D neonatal MRI via supervised machine learning. A total of 1,020 two‐dimensional transverse T2‐weighted MRI images of preterm newborns were examined and classified as either QC Pass or QC Fail. Then 70 features across focus, texture, noise, and natural scene statistics categories were extracted from each image. Several different classifiers were trained and their performance was compared with subjective rating as the gold standard. We repeated the rating process again to examine the stability of the rating and classification. When tested via 10‐fold cross validation, the random undersampling and adaboost ensemble (RUSBoost) method achieved the best overall performance for QC Fail images with 85% positive predictive value along with 75% sensitivity. Similar classification performance was observed in the analyses of the repeated subjective rating. Current results served as a proof of concept for predicting images that fail quality control using no‐reference objective image features. We also highlighted the importance of evaluating results beyond mere accuracy as a performance measure for machine learning in imbalanced group settings due to larger proportion of QC Pass quality images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6588009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65880092019-07-02 Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets Ding, Yang Suffren, Sabrina Bellec, Pierre Lodygensky, Gregory A. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Quality control (QC) of brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) is an important process requiring a significant amount of manual inspection. Major artifacts, such as severe subject motion, are easy to identify to naïve observers but lack automated identification tools. Clinical trials involving motion‐prone neonates typically pool data to obtain sufficient power, and automated quality control protocols are especially important to safeguard data quality. Current study tested an open source method to detect major artifacts among 2D neonatal MRI via supervised machine learning. A total of 1,020 two‐dimensional transverse T2‐weighted MRI images of preterm newborns were examined and classified as either QC Pass or QC Fail. Then 70 features across focus, texture, noise, and natural scene statistics categories were extracted from each image. Several different classifiers were trained and their performance was compared with subjective rating as the gold standard. We repeated the rating process again to examine the stability of the rating and classification. When tested via 10‐fold cross validation, the random undersampling and adaboost ensemble (RUSBoost) method achieved the best overall performance for QC Fail images with 85% positive predictive value along with 75% sensitivity. Similar classification performance was observed in the analyses of the repeated subjective rating. Current results served as a proof of concept for predicting images that fail quality control using no‐reference objective image features. We also highlighted the importance of evaluating results beyond mere accuracy as a performance measure for machine learning in imbalanced group settings due to larger proportion of QC Pass quality images. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6588009/ /pubmed/30467922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24449 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Ding, Yang
Suffren, Sabrina
Bellec, Pierre
Lodygensky, Gregory A.
Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets
title Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets
title_full Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets
title_fullStr Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets
title_full_unstemmed Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets
title_short Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets
title_sort supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24449
work_keys_str_mv AT dingyang supervisedmachinelearningqualitycontrolformagneticresonanceartifactsinneonataldatasets
AT suffrensabrina supervisedmachinelearningqualitycontrolformagneticresonanceartifactsinneonataldatasets
AT bellecpierre supervisedmachinelearningqualitycontrolformagneticresonanceartifactsinneonataldatasets
AT lodygenskygregorya supervisedmachinelearningqualitycontrolformagneticresonanceartifactsinneonataldatasets