Cargando…

Switching Circuit Optimization for Matrix Gradient Coils

Matrix gradient coils with up to 84 coil elements were recently introduced for magnetic resonance imaging. Ideally, each element is driven by a dedicated amplifier, which may be technically and financially infeasible. Instead, several elements can be connected in series (called a “cluster”) and driv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kroboth, Stefan, Layton, Kelvin J., Jia, Feng, Littin, Sebastian, Yu, Huijun, Hennig, Jürgen, Zaitsev, Maxim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Grapho Publications, LLC 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245546
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2018.00056
_version_ 1783429206365962240
author Kroboth, Stefan
Layton, Kelvin J.
Jia, Feng
Littin, Sebastian
Yu, Huijun
Hennig, Jürgen
Zaitsev, Maxim
author_facet Kroboth, Stefan
Layton, Kelvin J.
Jia, Feng
Littin, Sebastian
Yu, Huijun
Hennig, Jürgen
Zaitsev, Maxim
author_sort Kroboth, Stefan
collection PubMed
description Matrix gradient coils with up to 84 coil elements were recently introduced for magnetic resonance imaging. Ideally, each element is driven by a dedicated amplifier, which may be technically and financially infeasible. Instead, several elements can be connected in series (called a “cluster”) and driven by a single amplifier. In previous works, a set of clusters, called a “configuration,” was sought to approximate a target field shape. Because a magnetic resonance pulse sequence requires several distinct field shapes, a mechanism to switch between configurations is needed. This can be achieved by a hypothetical switching circuit connecting all terminals of all elements with each other and with the amplifiers. For a predefined set of configurations, a switching circuit can be designed to require only a limited amount of switches. Here we introduce an algorithm to minimize the number of switches without affecting the ability of the configurations to accurately create the desired fields. The problem is modeled using graph theory and split into 2 sequential combinatorial optimization problems that are solved using simulated annealing. For the investigated cases, the results show that compared to unoptimized switching circuits, the reduction of switches in optimized circuits ranges from 8% to up to 44% (average of 31%). This substantial reduction is achieved without impeding circuit functionality. This study shows how technical effort associated with implementation and operation of a matrix gradient coil is related to different hardware setups and how to reduce this effort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6588200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Grapho Publications, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65882002019-06-26 Switching Circuit Optimization for Matrix Gradient Coils Kroboth, Stefan Layton, Kelvin J. Jia, Feng Littin, Sebastian Yu, Huijun Hennig, Jürgen Zaitsev, Maxim Tomography Research Articles Matrix gradient coils with up to 84 coil elements were recently introduced for magnetic resonance imaging. Ideally, each element is driven by a dedicated amplifier, which may be technically and financially infeasible. Instead, several elements can be connected in series (called a “cluster”) and driven by a single amplifier. In previous works, a set of clusters, called a “configuration,” was sought to approximate a target field shape. Because a magnetic resonance pulse sequence requires several distinct field shapes, a mechanism to switch between configurations is needed. This can be achieved by a hypothetical switching circuit connecting all terminals of all elements with each other and with the amplifiers. For a predefined set of configurations, a switching circuit can be designed to require only a limited amount of switches. Here we introduce an algorithm to minimize the number of switches without affecting the ability of the configurations to accurately create the desired fields. The problem is modeled using graph theory and split into 2 sequential combinatorial optimization problems that are solved using simulated annealing. For the investigated cases, the results show that compared to unoptimized switching circuits, the reduction of switches in optimized circuits ranges from 8% to up to 44% (average of 31%). This substantial reduction is achieved without impeding circuit functionality. This study shows how technical effort associated with implementation and operation of a matrix gradient coil is related to different hardware setups and how to reduce this effort. Grapho Publications, LLC 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6588200/ /pubmed/31245546 http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2018.00056 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by Grapho Publications, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Kroboth, Stefan
Layton, Kelvin J.
Jia, Feng
Littin, Sebastian
Yu, Huijun
Hennig, Jürgen
Zaitsev, Maxim
Switching Circuit Optimization for Matrix Gradient Coils
title Switching Circuit Optimization for Matrix Gradient Coils
title_full Switching Circuit Optimization for Matrix Gradient Coils
title_fullStr Switching Circuit Optimization for Matrix Gradient Coils
title_full_unstemmed Switching Circuit Optimization for Matrix Gradient Coils
title_short Switching Circuit Optimization for Matrix Gradient Coils
title_sort switching circuit optimization for matrix gradient coils
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245546
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2018.00056
work_keys_str_mv AT krobothstefan switchingcircuitoptimizationformatrixgradientcoils
AT laytonkelvinj switchingcircuitoptimizationformatrixgradientcoils
AT jiafeng switchingcircuitoptimizationformatrixgradientcoils
AT littinsebastian switchingcircuitoptimizationformatrixgradientcoils
AT yuhuijun switchingcircuitoptimizationformatrixgradientcoils
AT hennigjurgen switchingcircuitoptimizationformatrixgradientcoils
AT zaitsevmaxim switchingcircuitoptimizationformatrixgradientcoils