Cargando…

Models that learn how humans learn: The case of decision-making and its disorders

Popular computational models of decision-making make specific assumptions about learning processes that may cause them to underfit observed behaviours. Here we suggest an alternative method using recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to generate a flexible family of models that have sufficient capacity t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dezfouli, Amir, Griffiths, Kristi, Ramos, Fabio, Dayan, Peter, Balleine, Bernard W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31185008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006903
_version_ 1783429220330897408
author Dezfouli, Amir
Griffiths, Kristi
Ramos, Fabio
Dayan, Peter
Balleine, Bernard W.
author_facet Dezfouli, Amir
Griffiths, Kristi
Ramos, Fabio
Dayan, Peter
Balleine, Bernard W.
author_sort Dezfouli, Amir
collection PubMed
description Popular computational models of decision-making make specific assumptions about learning processes that may cause them to underfit observed behaviours. Here we suggest an alternative method using recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to generate a flexible family of models that have sufficient capacity to represent the complex learning and decision- making strategies used by humans. In this approach, an RNN is trained to predict the next action that a subject will take in a decision-making task and, in this way, learns to imitate the processes underlying subjects’ choices and their learning abilities. We demonstrate the benefits of this approach using a new dataset drawn from patients with either unipolar (n = 34) or bipolar (n = 33) depression and matched healthy controls (n = 34) making decisions on a two-armed bandit task. The results indicate that this new approach is better than baseline reinforcement-learning methods in terms of overall performance and its capacity to predict subjects’ choices. We show that the model can be interpreted using off-policy simulations and thereby provides a novel clustering of subjects’ learning processes—something that often eludes traditional approaches to modelling and behavioural analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6588260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65882602019-06-28 Models that learn how humans learn: The case of decision-making and its disorders Dezfouli, Amir Griffiths, Kristi Ramos, Fabio Dayan, Peter Balleine, Bernard W. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Popular computational models of decision-making make specific assumptions about learning processes that may cause them to underfit observed behaviours. Here we suggest an alternative method using recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to generate a flexible family of models that have sufficient capacity to represent the complex learning and decision- making strategies used by humans. In this approach, an RNN is trained to predict the next action that a subject will take in a decision-making task and, in this way, learns to imitate the processes underlying subjects’ choices and their learning abilities. We demonstrate the benefits of this approach using a new dataset drawn from patients with either unipolar (n = 34) or bipolar (n = 33) depression and matched healthy controls (n = 34) making decisions on a two-armed bandit task. The results indicate that this new approach is better than baseline reinforcement-learning methods in terms of overall performance and its capacity to predict subjects’ choices. We show that the model can be interpreted using off-policy simulations and thereby provides a novel clustering of subjects’ learning processes—something that often eludes traditional approaches to modelling and behavioural analysis. Public Library of Science 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6588260/ /pubmed/31185008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006903 Text en © 2019 Dezfouli et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dezfouli, Amir
Griffiths, Kristi
Ramos, Fabio
Dayan, Peter
Balleine, Bernard W.
Models that learn how humans learn: The case of decision-making and its disorders
title Models that learn how humans learn: The case of decision-making and its disorders
title_full Models that learn how humans learn: The case of decision-making and its disorders
title_fullStr Models that learn how humans learn: The case of decision-making and its disorders
title_full_unstemmed Models that learn how humans learn: The case of decision-making and its disorders
title_short Models that learn how humans learn: The case of decision-making and its disorders
title_sort models that learn how humans learn: the case of decision-making and its disorders
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31185008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006903
work_keys_str_mv AT dezfouliamir modelsthatlearnhowhumanslearnthecaseofdecisionmakinganditsdisorders
AT griffithskristi modelsthatlearnhowhumanslearnthecaseofdecisionmakinganditsdisorders
AT ramosfabio modelsthatlearnhowhumanslearnthecaseofdecisionmakinganditsdisorders
AT dayanpeter modelsthatlearnhowhumanslearnthecaseofdecisionmakinganditsdisorders
AT balleinebernardw modelsthatlearnhowhumanslearnthecaseofdecisionmakinganditsdisorders