Cargando…

Optimising eHealth tools for older patients: Collaborative redesign of a hospital website

Most hospital websites have not been developed in collaboration with patients and, therefore, rarely take into account the preferences and abilities of older patients. This study describes the systematic redesign of an existing hospital website in a co‐design process with patients and professional s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Minh Hao, Bol, Nadine, van Weert, Julia C. M., Loos, Eugène F., Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J., Geijsen, Debby, Drenth, Ellen, Janse, Meriam, Smets, Ellen M. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30015998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12882
_version_ 1783429221037637632
author Nguyen, Minh Hao
Bol, Nadine
van Weert, Julia C. M.
Loos, Eugène F.
Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J.
Geijsen, Debby
Drenth, Ellen
Janse, Meriam
Smets, Ellen M. A.
author_facet Nguyen, Minh Hao
Bol, Nadine
van Weert, Julia C. M.
Loos, Eugène F.
Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J.
Geijsen, Debby
Drenth, Ellen
Janse, Meriam
Smets, Ellen M. A.
author_sort Nguyen, Minh Hao
collection PubMed
description Most hospital websites have not been developed in collaboration with patients and, therefore, rarely take into account the preferences and abilities of older patients. This study describes the systematic redesign of an existing hospital website in a co‐design process with patients and professional stakeholders (e.g. researchers, physicians, nurses, department heads, policymakers, website designers), with the aim to make it more user‐friendly for older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The redesign process consisted of three phases, where (I) both existing content and design were evaluated among CRC patients; (II) a prototype website was developed based on these insights; which (III) was evaluated again before making final adjustments. Mixed research methods were used for the redesign process. Specifically, insights from existing literature, outcomes from qualitative and quantitative empirical studies conducted by our team, and expert knowledge from relevant stakeholders, were collected and discussed in multidisciplinary consensus meetings, and served as input for the redesigned website. While the existing website was evaluated poorly, the qualitative evaluation of the prototype website in phase 3 showed that the newly redesigned website was usable for older CRC patients. A practical roadmap on how to collaboratively redesign and optimise existing eHealth tools to make them suitable for and operational in clinical settings is provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6588263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65882632019-07-02 Optimising eHealth tools for older patients: Collaborative redesign of a hospital website Nguyen, Minh Hao Bol, Nadine van Weert, Julia C. M. Loos, Eugène F. Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J. Geijsen, Debby Drenth, Ellen Janse, Meriam Smets, Ellen M. A. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Original Articles Most hospital websites have not been developed in collaboration with patients and, therefore, rarely take into account the preferences and abilities of older patients. This study describes the systematic redesign of an existing hospital website in a co‐design process with patients and professional stakeholders (e.g. researchers, physicians, nurses, department heads, policymakers, website designers), with the aim to make it more user‐friendly for older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The redesign process consisted of three phases, where (I) both existing content and design were evaluated among CRC patients; (II) a prototype website was developed based on these insights; which (III) was evaluated again before making final adjustments. Mixed research methods were used for the redesign process. Specifically, insights from existing literature, outcomes from qualitative and quantitative empirical studies conducted by our team, and expert knowledge from relevant stakeholders, were collected and discussed in multidisciplinary consensus meetings, and served as input for the redesigned website. While the existing website was evaluated poorly, the qualitative evaluation of the prototype website in phase 3 showed that the newly redesigned website was usable for older CRC patients. A practical roadmap on how to collaboratively redesign and optimise existing eHealth tools to make them suitable for and operational in clinical settings is provided. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-17 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6588263/ /pubmed/30015998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12882 Text en 2018 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nguyen, Minh Hao
Bol, Nadine
van Weert, Julia C. M.
Loos, Eugène F.
Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J.
Geijsen, Debby
Drenth, Ellen
Janse, Meriam
Smets, Ellen M. A.
Optimising eHealth tools for older patients: Collaborative redesign of a hospital website
title Optimising eHealth tools for older patients: Collaborative redesign of a hospital website
title_full Optimising eHealth tools for older patients: Collaborative redesign of a hospital website
title_fullStr Optimising eHealth tools for older patients: Collaborative redesign of a hospital website
title_full_unstemmed Optimising eHealth tools for older patients: Collaborative redesign of a hospital website
title_short Optimising eHealth tools for older patients: Collaborative redesign of a hospital website
title_sort optimising ehealth tools for older patients: collaborative redesign of a hospital website
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30015998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12882
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenminhhao optimisingehealthtoolsforolderpatientscollaborativeredesignofahospitalwebsite
AT bolnadine optimisingehealthtoolsforolderpatientscollaborativeredesignofahospitalwebsite
AT vanweertjuliacm optimisingehealthtoolsforolderpatientscollaborativeredesignofahospitalwebsite
AT looseugenef optimisingehealthtoolsforolderpatientscollaborativeredesignofahospitalwebsite
AT tytgatkristienmaj optimisingehealthtoolsforolderpatientscollaborativeredesignofahospitalwebsite
AT geijsendebby optimisingehealthtoolsforolderpatientscollaborativeredesignofahospitalwebsite
AT drenthellen optimisingehealthtoolsforolderpatientscollaborativeredesignofahospitalwebsite
AT jansemeriam optimisingehealthtoolsforolderpatientscollaborativeredesignofahospitalwebsite
AT smetsellenma optimisingehealthtoolsforolderpatientscollaborativeredesignofahospitalwebsite