Cargando…

Coulomb pre-stress and fault bends are ignored yet vital factors for earthquake triggering and hazard

Successive locations of individual large earthquakes (M(w) > 5.5) over years to centuries can be difficult to explain with simple Coulomb stress transfer (CST) because it is common for seismicity to circumvent nearest-neighbour along-strike faults where coseismic CST is greatest. We demonstrate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mildon, Z. K., Roberts, G. P., Faure Walker, J. P., Toda, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31227694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10520-6
_version_ 1783429241672564736
author Mildon, Z. K.
Roberts, G. P.
Faure Walker, J. P.
Toda, S.
author_facet Mildon, Z. K.
Roberts, G. P.
Faure Walker, J. P.
Toda, S.
author_sort Mildon, Z. K.
collection PubMed
description Successive locations of individual large earthquakes (M(w) > 5.5) over years to centuries can be difficult to explain with simple Coulomb stress transfer (CST) because it is common for seismicity to circumvent nearest-neighbour along-strike faults where coseismic CST is greatest. We demonstrate that Coulomb pre-stress (the cumulative CST from multiple earthquakes and interseismic loading on non-planar faults) may explain this, evidenced by study of a 667-year historical record of earthquakes in central Italy. Heterogeneity in Coulomb pre-stresses across the fault system is >±50 bars, whereas coseismic CST is <±2 bars, so the latter will rarely overwhelm the former, explaining why historical earthquakes rarely rupture nearest neighbor faults. However, earthquakes do tend to occur where the cumulative coseismic and interseismic CST is positive, although there are notable examples where earthquake propagate across negatively stressed portions of faults. Hence Coulomb pre-stress calculated for non-planar faults is an ignored yet vital factor for earthquake triggering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6588554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65885542019-06-25 Coulomb pre-stress and fault bends are ignored yet vital factors for earthquake triggering and hazard Mildon, Z. K. Roberts, G. P. Faure Walker, J. P. Toda, S. Nat Commun Article Successive locations of individual large earthquakes (M(w) > 5.5) over years to centuries can be difficult to explain with simple Coulomb stress transfer (CST) because it is common for seismicity to circumvent nearest-neighbour along-strike faults where coseismic CST is greatest. We demonstrate that Coulomb pre-stress (the cumulative CST from multiple earthquakes and interseismic loading on non-planar faults) may explain this, evidenced by study of a 667-year historical record of earthquakes in central Italy. Heterogeneity in Coulomb pre-stresses across the fault system is >±50 bars, whereas coseismic CST is <±2 bars, so the latter will rarely overwhelm the former, explaining why historical earthquakes rarely rupture nearest neighbor faults. However, earthquakes do tend to occur where the cumulative coseismic and interseismic CST is positive, although there are notable examples where earthquake propagate across negatively stressed portions of faults. Hence Coulomb pre-stress calculated for non-planar faults is an ignored yet vital factor for earthquake triggering. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6588554/ /pubmed/31227694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10520-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Mildon, Z. K.
Roberts, G. P.
Faure Walker, J. P.
Toda, S.
Coulomb pre-stress and fault bends are ignored yet vital factors for earthquake triggering and hazard
title Coulomb pre-stress and fault bends are ignored yet vital factors for earthquake triggering and hazard
title_full Coulomb pre-stress and fault bends are ignored yet vital factors for earthquake triggering and hazard
title_fullStr Coulomb pre-stress and fault bends are ignored yet vital factors for earthquake triggering and hazard
title_full_unstemmed Coulomb pre-stress and fault bends are ignored yet vital factors for earthquake triggering and hazard
title_short Coulomb pre-stress and fault bends are ignored yet vital factors for earthquake triggering and hazard
title_sort coulomb pre-stress and fault bends are ignored yet vital factors for earthquake triggering and hazard
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31227694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10520-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mildonzk coulombprestressandfaultbendsareignoredyetvitalfactorsforearthquaketriggeringandhazard
AT robertsgp coulombprestressandfaultbendsareignoredyetvitalfactorsforearthquaketriggeringandhazard
AT faurewalkerjp coulombprestressandfaultbendsareignoredyetvitalfactorsforearthquaketriggeringandhazard
AT todas coulombprestressandfaultbendsareignoredyetvitalfactorsforearthquaketriggeringandhazard