Cargando…

The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat

Genomic selection offers several routes for increasing the genetic gain or efficiency of plant breeding programmes. In various species of livestock, there is empirical evidence of increased rates of genetic gain from the use of genomic selection to target different aspects of the breeder’s equation....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwards, Stefan McKinnon, Buntjer, Jaap B., Jackson, Robert, Bentley, Alison R., Lage, Jacob, Byrne, Ed, Burt, Chris, Jack, Peter, Berry, Simon, Flatman, Edward, Poupard, Bruno, Smith, Stephen, Hayes, Charlotte, Gaynor, R. Chris, Gorjanc, Gregor, Howell, Phil, Ober, Eric, Mackay, Ian J., Hickey, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30888431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y
_version_ 1783429265732141056
author Edwards, Stefan McKinnon
Buntjer, Jaap B.
Jackson, Robert
Bentley, Alison R.
Lage, Jacob
Byrne, Ed
Burt, Chris
Jack, Peter
Berry, Simon
Flatman, Edward
Poupard, Bruno
Smith, Stephen
Hayes, Charlotte
Gaynor, R. Chris
Gorjanc, Gregor
Howell, Phil
Ober, Eric
Mackay, Ian J.
Hickey, John M.
author_facet Edwards, Stefan McKinnon
Buntjer, Jaap B.
Jackson, Robert
Bentley, Alison R.
Lage, Jacob
Byrne, Ed
Burt, Chris
Jack, Peter
Berry, Simon
Flatman, Edward
Poupard, Bruno
Smith, Stephen
Hayes, Charlotte
Gaynor, R. Chris
Gorjanc, Gregor
Howell, Phil
Ober, Eric
Mackay, Ian J.
Hickey, John M.
author_sort Edwards, Stefan McKinnon
collection PubMed
description Genomic selection offers several routes for increasing the genetic gain or efficiency of plant breeding programmes. In various species of livestock, there is empirical evidence of increased rates of genetic gain from the use of genomic selection to target different aspects of the breeder’s equation. Accurate predictions of genomic breeding value are central to this, and the design of training sets is in turn central to achieving sufficient levels of accuracy. In summary, small numbers of close relatives and very large numbers of distant relatives are expected to enable predictions with higher accuracy. To quantify the effect of some of the properties of training sets on the accuracy of genomic selection in crops, we performed an extensive field-based winter wheat trial. In summary, this trial involved the construction of 44 F(2:4) bi- and tri-parental populations, from which 2992 lines were grown on four field locations and yield was measured. For each line, genotype data were generated for 25 K segregating SNP markers. The overall heritability of yield was estimated to 0.65, and estimates within individual families ranged between 0.10 and 0.85. Genomic prediction accuracies of yield BLUEs were 0.125–0.127 using two different cross-validation approaches and generally increased with training set size. Using related crosses in training and validation sets generally resulted in higher prediction accuracies than using unrelated crosses. The results of this study emphasise the importance of the training panel design in relation to the genetic material to which the resulting prediction model is to be applied. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6588656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65886562019-07-05 The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat Edwards, Stefan McKinnon Buntjer, Jaap B. Jackson, Robert Bentley, Alison R. Lage, Jacob Byrne, Ed Burt, Chris Jack, Peter Berry, Simon Flatman, Edward Poupard, Bruno Smith, Stephen Hayes, Charlotte Gaynor, R. Chris Gorjanc, Gregor Howell, Phil Ober, Eric Mackay, Ian J. Hickey, John M. Theor Appl Genet Original Article Genomic selection offers several routes for increasing the genetic gain or efficiency of plant breeding programmes. In various species of livestock, there is empirical evidence of increased rates of genetic gain from the use of genomic selection to target different aspects of the breeder’s equation. Accurate predictions of genomic breeding value are central to this, and the design of training sets is in turn central to achieving sufficient levels of accuracy. In summary, small numbers of close relatives and very large numbers of distant relatives are expected to enable predictions with higher accuracy. To quantify the effect of some of the properties of training sets on the accuracy of genomic selection in crops, we performed an extensive field-based winter wheat trial. In summary, this trial involved the construction of 44 F(2:4) bi- and tri-parental populations, from which 2992 lines were grown on four field locations and yield was measured. For each line, genotype data were generated for 25 K segregating SNP markers. The overall heritability of yield was estimated to 0.65, and estimates within individual families ranged between 0.10 and 0.85. Genomic prediction accuracies of yield BLUEs were 0.125–0.127 using two different cross-validation approaches and generally increased with training set size. Using related crosses in training and validation sets generally resulted in higher prediction accuracies than using unrelated crosses. The results of this study emphasise the importance of the training panel design in relation to the genetic material to which the resulting prediction model is to be applied. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-03-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6588656/ /pubmed/30888431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Edwards, Stefan McKinnon
Buntjer, Jaap B.
Jackson, Robert
Bentley, Alison R.
Lage, Jacob
Byrne, Ed
Burt, Chris
Jack, Peter
Berry, Simon
Flatman, Edward
Poupard, Bruno
Smith, Stephen
Hayes, Charlotte
Gaynor, R. Chris
Gorjanc, Gregor
Howell, Phil
Ober, Eric
Mackay, Ian J.
Hickey, John M.
The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
title The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
title_full The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
title_fullStr The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
title_full_unstemmed The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
title_short The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
title_sort effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30888431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardsstefanmckinnon theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT buntjerjaapb theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT jacksonrobert theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT bentleyalisonr theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT lagejacob theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT byrneed theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT burtchris theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT jackpeter theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT berrysimon theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT flatmanedward theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT poupardbruno theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT smithstephen theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT hayescharlotte theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT gaynorrchris theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT gorjancgregor theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT howellphil theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT obereric theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT mackayianj theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT hickeyjohnm theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT edwardsstefanmckinnon effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT buntjerjaapb effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT jacksonrobert effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT bentleyalisonr effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT lagejacob effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT byrneed effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT burtchris effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT jackpeter effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT berrysimon effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT flatmanedward effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT poupardbruno effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT smithstephen effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT hayescharlotte effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT gaynorrchris effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT gorjancgregor effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT howellphil effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT obereric effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT mackayianj effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat
AT hickeyjohnm effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat