Cargando…
The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
Genomic selection offers several routes for increasing the genetic gain or efficiency of plant breeding programmes. In various species of livestock, there is empirical evidence of increased rates of genetic gain from the use of genomic selection to target different aspects of the breeder’s equation....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30888431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y |
_version_ | 1783429265732141056 |
---|---|
author | Edwards, Stefan McKinnon Buntjer, Jaap B. Jackson, Robert Bentley, Alison R. Lage, Jacob Byrne, Ed Burt, Chris Jack, Peter Berry, Simon Flatman, Edward Poupard, Bruno Smith, Stephen Hayes, Charlotte Gaynor, R. Chris Gorjanc, Gregor Howell, Phil Ober, Eric Mackay, Ian J. Hickey, John M. |
author_facet | Edwards, Stefan McKinnon Buntjer, Jaap B. Jackson, Robert Bentley, Alison R. Lage, Jacob Byrne, Ed Burt, Chris Jack, Peter Berry, Simon Flatman, Edward Poupard, Bruno Smith, Stephen Hayes, Charlotte Gaynor, R. Chris Gorjanc, Gregor Howell, Phil Ober, Eric Mackay, Ian J. Hickey, John M. |
author_sort | Edwards, Stefan McKinnon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genomic selection offers several routes for increasing the genetic gain or efficiency of plant breeding programmes. In various species of livestock, there is empirical evidence of increased rates of genetic gain from the use of genomic selection to target different aspects of the breeder’s equation. Accurate predictions of genomic breeding value are central to this, and the design of training sets is in turn central to achieving sufficient levels of accuracy. In summary, small numbers of close relatives and very large numbers of distant relatives are expected to enable predictions with higher accuracy. To quantify the effect of some of the properties of training sets on the accuracy of genomic selection in crops, we performed an extensive field-based winter wheat trial. In summary, this trial involved the construction of 44 F(2:4) bi- and tri-parental populations, from which 2992 lines were grown on four field locations and yield was measured. For each line, genotype data were generated for 25 K segregating SNP markers. The overall heritability of yield was estimated to 0.65, and estimates within individual families ranged between 0.10 and 0.85. Genomic prediction accuracies of yield BLUEs were 0.125–0.127 using two different cross-validation approaches and generally increased with training set size. Using related crosses in training and validation sets generally resulted in higher prediction accuracies than using unrelated crosses. The results of this study emphasise the importance of the training panel design in relation to the genetic material to which the resulting prediction model is to be applied. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6588656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65886562019-07-05 The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat Edwards, Stefan McKinnon Buntjer, Jaap B. Jackson, Robert Bentley, Alison R. Lage, Jacob Byrne, Ed Burt, Chris Jack, Peter Berry, Simon Flatman, Edward Poupard, Bruno Smith, Stephen Hayes, Charlotte Gaynor, R. Chris Gorjanc, Gregor Howell, Phil Ober, Eric Mackay, Ian J. Hickey, John M. Theor Appl Genet Original Article Genomic selection offers several routes for increasing the genetic gain or efficiency of plant breeding programmes. In various species of livestock, there is empirical evidence of increased rates of genetic gain from the use of genomic selection to target different aspects of the breeder’s equation. Accurate predictions of genomic breeding value are central to this, and the design of training sets is in turn central to achieving sufficient levels of accuracy. In summary, small numbers of close relatives and very large numbers of distant relatives are expected to enable predictions with higher accuracy. To quantify the effect of some of the properties of training sets on the accuracy of genomic selection in crops, we performed an extensive field-based winter wheat trial. In summary, this trial involved the construction of 44 F(2:4) bi- and tri-parental populations, from which 2992 lines were grown on four field locations and yield was measured. For each line, genotype data were generated for 25 K segregating SNP markers. The overall heritability of yield was estimated to 0.65, and estimates within individual families ranged between 0.10 and 0.85. Genomic prediction accuracies of yield BLUEs were 0.125–0.127 using two different cross-validation approaches and generally increased with training set size. Using related crosses in training and validation sets generally resulted in higher prediction accuracies than using unrelated crosses. The results of this study emphasise the importance of the training panel design in relation to the genetic material to which the resulting prediction model is to be applied. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-03-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6588656/ /pubmed/30888431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Edwards, Stefan McKinnon Buntjer, Jaap B. Jackson, Robert Bentley, Alison R. Lage, Jacob Byrne, Ed Burt, Chris Jack, Peter Berry, Simon Flatman, Edward Poupard, Bruno Smith, Stephen Hayes, Charlotte Gaynor, R. Chris Gorjanc, Gregor Howell, Phil Ober, Eric Mackay, Ian J. Hickey, John M. The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat |
title | The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat |
title_full | The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat |
title_fullStr | The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat |
title_short | The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat |
title_sort | effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30888431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edwardsstefanmckinnon theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT buntjerjaapb theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT jacksonrobert theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT bentleyalisonr theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT lagejacob theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT byrneed theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT burtchris theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT jackpeter theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT berrysimon theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT flatmanedward theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT poupardbruno theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT smithstephen theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT hayescharlotte theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT gaynorrchris theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT gorjancgregor theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT howellphil theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT obereric theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT mackayianj theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT hickeyjohnm theeffectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT edwardsstefanmckinnon effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT buntjerjaapb effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT jacksonrobert effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT bentleyalisonr effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT lagejacob effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT byrneed effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT burtchris effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT jackpeter effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT berrysimon effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT flatmanedward effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT poupardbruno effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT smithstephen effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT hayescharlotte effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT gaynorrchris effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT gorjancgregor effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT howellphil effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT obereric effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT mackayianj effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat AT hickeyjohnm effectsoftrainingpopulationdesignongenomicpredictionaccuracyinwheat |