Cargando…

A systematic review of infectious illness Presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors

BACKGROUND: Workplace presenteeism is common and leads to the spread of infectious diseases. Previous reviews have focused on presenteeism in relation to general physical or mental ill health. In this systematic review we identified the prevalence of, and reasons and risk factors for, presenteeism i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webster, R. K., Liu, R., Karimullina, K., Hall, I., Amlôt, R., Rubin, G. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7138-x
_version_ 1783429304679399424
author Webster, R. K.
Liu, R.
Karimullina, K.
Hall, I.
Amlôt, R.
Rubin, G. J.
author_facet Webster, R. K.
Liu, R.
Karimullina, K.
Hall, I.
Amlôt, R.
Rubin, G. J.
author_sort Webster, R. K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Workplace presenteeism is common and leads to the spread of infectious diseases. Previous reviews have focused on presenteeism in relation to general physical or mental ill health. In this systematic review we identified the prevalence of, and reasons and risk factors for, presenteeism in relation to an infectious illness. METHOD: We searched Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO and PsycARTICLES with terms relating to infectious illnesses and presenteeism at the work place or school; reference lists of relevant articles were also hand-searched. RESULT: Our search yielded 3580 papers after deduplication. After title, abstract and full text screening, 23 papers reporting on 24 studies were included. Twenty-three studies were cross-sectional studies and one was prospective. The quality of included studies was relatively poor due to problems such as sampling and non-response bias. Presenteeism prevalence ranged from 35 to 97%. Self-reported reasons for presenteeism fell into three main themes: 1. Organisational factors (organisational policy, presenteeism culture, disciplinary action), 2. Job characteristics (lack of cover, professionalism, job demand), and 3. Personal reasons (burden on colleagues, colleague perceptions, threshold of sickness absence and financial concerns). Statistical risk factors fell into four themes: 1. Sociodemographic, 2. Health, 3. Influenza-related behaviour, and 4. Employment characteristics. Most of the risk factors had insufficient evidence to allow us to draw any firm conclusions, and evidence regarding gender and age was inconsistent. The risk factor with the most consistent findings concerned occupation type, suggesting that those who worked in the healthcare sector, and specifically physicians, were at a higher risk of infectious illness presenteeism. CONCLUSION: Infectious illness presenteeism is common. To address the public health consequences, organisations should focus on promoting a positive working culture and developing sickness absence policies that reduce presenteeism. Further research is needed in non-health sector organisations and schools to identify risk factors related to different organisations, which can then be used to tailor interventions at the organisational and individual level. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7138-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6588911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65889112019-07-08 A systematic review of infectious illness Presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors Webster, R. K. Liu, R. Karimullina, K. Hall, I. Amlôt, R. Rubin, G. J. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Workplace presenteeism is common and leads to the spread of infectious diseases. Previous reviews have focused on presenteeism in relation to general physical or mental ill health. In this systematic review we identified the prevalence of, and reasons and risk factors for, presenteeism in relation to an infectious illness. METHOD: We searched Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO and PsycARTICLES with terms relating to infectious illnesses and presenteeism at the work place or school; reference lists of relevant articles were also hand-searched. RESULT: Our search yielded 3580 papers after deduplication. After title, abstract and full text screening, 23 papers reporting on 24 studies were included. Twenty-three studies were cross-sectional studies and one was prospective. The quality of included studies was relatively poor due to problems such as sampling and non-response bias. Presenteeism prevalence ranged from 35 to 97%. Self-reported reasons for presenteeism fell into three main themes: 1. Organisational factors (organisational policy, presenteeism culture, disciplinary action), 2. Job characteristics (lack of cover, professionalism, job demand), and 3. Personal reasons (burden on colleagues, colleague perceptions, threshold of sickness absence and financial concerns). Statistical risk factors fell into four themes: 1. Sociodemographic, 2. Health, 3. Influenza-related behaviour, and 4. Employment characteristics. Most of the risk factors had insufficient evidence to allow us to draw any firm conclusions, and evidence regarding gender and age was inconsistent. The risk factor with the most consistent findings concerned occupation type, suggesting that those who worked in the healthcare sector, and specifically physicians, were at a higher risk of infectious illness presenteeism. CONCLUSION: Infectious illness presenteeism is common. To address the public health consequences, organisations should focus on promoting a positive working culture and developing sickness absence policies that reduce presenteeism. Further research is needed in non-health sector organisations and schools to identify risk factors related to different organisations, which can then be used to tailor interventions at the organisational and individual level. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7138-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6588911/ /pubmed/31226966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7138-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Webster, R. K.
Liu, R.
Karimullina, K.
Hall, I.
Amlôt, R.
Rubin, G. J.
A systematic review of infectious illness Presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors
title A systematic review of infectious illness Presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors
title_full A systematic review of infectious illness Presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors
title_fullStr A systematic review of infectious illness Presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of infectious illness Presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors
title_short A systematic review of infectious illness Presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors
title_sort systematic review of infectious illness presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7138-x
work_keys_str_mv AT websterrk asystematicreviewofinfectiousillnesspresenteeismprevalencereasonsandriskfactors
AT liur asystematicreviewofinfectiousillnesspresenteeismprevalencereasonsandriskfactors
AT karimullinak asystematicreviewofinfectiousillnesspresenteeismprevalencereasonsandriskfactors
AT halli asystematicreviewofinfectiousillnesspresenteeismprevalencereasonsandriskfactors
AT amlotr asystematicreviewofinfectiousillnesspresenteeismprevalencereasonsandriskfactors
AT rubingj asystematicreviewofinfectiousillnesspresenteeismprevalencereasonsandriskfactors
AT websterrk systematicreviewofinfectiousillnesspresenteeismprevalencereasonsandriskfactors
AT liur systematicreviewofinfectiousillnesspresenteeismprevalencereasonsandriskfactors
AT karimullinak systematicreviewofinfectiousillnesspresenteeismprevalencereasonsandriskfactors
AT halli systematicreviewofinfectiousillnesspresenteeismprevalencereasonsandriskfactors
AT amlotr systematicreviewofinfectiousillnesspresenteeismprevalencereasonsandriskfactors
AT rubingj systematicreviewofinfectiousillnesspresenteeismprevalencereasonsandriskfactors