Cargando…
Decellularization of the mouse ovary: comparison of different scaffold generation protocols for future ovarian bioengineering
BACKGROUND: In order to preserve fertility in young women with disseminated cancer, e.g. leukemia, an approach that has been suggested is to retransplant isolated small follicles within an ovarian matrix free from malignant cells and with no risk for contamination. The present study evaluates the fi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31228949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0531-3 |
_version_ | 1783429310060691456 |
---|---|
author | Alshaikh, Ahmed Baker Padma, Arvind Manikantan Dehlin, Matilda Akouri, Randa Song, Min Jong Brännström, Mats Hellström, Mats |
author_facet | Alshaikh, Ahmed Baker Padma, Arvind Manikantan Dehlin, Matilda Akouri, Randa Song, Min Jong Brännström, Mats Hellström, Mats |
author_sort | Alshaikh, Ahmed Baker |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In order to preserve fertility in young women with disseminated cancer, e.g. leukemia, an approach that has been suggested is to retransplant isolated small follicles within an ovarian matrix free from malignant cells and with no risk for contamination. The present study evaluates the first step to create a bioengineered ovarian construct that can act as growth-supporting tissue for isolated small follicles that are dependent on a stroma for normal follicular maturation. The present study used the intact mouse ovary to develop a mouse ovarian scaffold through various protocols of decellularization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Potential Immunogenic DNA and intracellular components were removed from whole mouse ovaries by agitation in a 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate solution (Protocol 1; P1), or in a 2% sodium deoxycholate solution (P2) or by a combination of the two (P3). The remaining decelluralized ovarian extracellular matrix structure was then assessed based on the DNA- and protein content, and was further evaluated histologically by haematoxylin and eosin-, Verhoeff’s van gieson- (for elastin), Masson’s trichrome- (for collagens) and Alcian blue (for glycosaminoglycans) staining. We also evaluated the decellularization efficiency using the mild detergent Triton-X100 (1%). RESULTS: Sodium dodecyl sulfate efficiently removed DNA and intracellular components from the ovarian tissue but also significantly reduced the integrity of the remaining ovarian extracellular matrix. Sodium deoxycholate, a considerably milder detergent compared to sodium dodecyl sulfate, preserved the ovarian extracellular matrix better, evident by a more distinct staining for glycosaminoglycan, collagen and elastic fibres. Triton-X100 was found ineffective as a decellularization reagent for mouse ovaries in our settings. CONCLUSIONS: The sodium dodecyl sulfate generated ovarian scaffolds contained minute amounts of DNA that may be an advantage to evade a detrimental immune response following engraftment. The sodium deoxycholate generated ovarian scaffolds had higher donor DNA content, yet, retained the extracellular composition better and may therefore have improved recellularization and other downstream bioengineering applications. These two novel types of mouse ovarian scaffolds serve as promising scaffold-candidates for future ovarian bioengineering experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6588934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65889342019-07-08 Decellularization of the mouse ovary: comparison of different scaffold generation protocols for future ovarian bioengineering Alshaikh, Ahmed Baker Padma, Arvind Manikantan Dehlin, Matilda Akouri, Randa Song, Min Jong Brännström, Mats Hellström, Mats J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: In order to preserve fertility in young women with disseminated cancer, e.g. leukemia, an approach that has been suggested is to retransplant isolated small follicles within an ovarian matrix free from malignant cells and with no risk for contamination. The present study evaluates the first step to create a bioengineered ovarian construct that can act as growth-supporting tissue for isolated small follicles that are dependent on a stroma for normal follicular maturation. The present study used the intact mouse ovary to develop a mouse ovarian scaffold through various protocols of decellularization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Potential Immunogenic DNA and intracellular components were removed from whole mouse ovaries by agitation in a 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate solution (Protocol 1; P1), or in a 2% sodium deoxycholate solution (P2) or by a combination of the two (P3). The remaining decelluralized ovarian extracellular matrix structure was then assessed based on the DNA- and protein content, and was further evaluated histologically by haematoxylin and eosin-, Verhoeff’s van gieson- (for elastin), Masson’s trichrome- (for collagens) and Alcian blue (for glycosaminoglycans) staining. We also evaluated the decellularization efficiency using the mild detergent Triton-X100 (1%). RESULTS: Sodium dodecyl sulfate efficiently removed DNA and intracellular components from the ovarian tissue but also significantly reduced the integrity of the remaining ovarian extracellular matrix. Sodium deoxycholate, a considerably milder detergent compared to sodium dodecyl sulfate, preserved the ovarian extracellular matrix better, evident by a more distinct staining for glycosaminoglycan, collagen and elastic fibres. Triton-X100 was found ineffective as a decellularization reagent for mouse ovaries in our settings. CONCLUSIONS: The sodium dodecyl sulfate generated ovarian scaffolds contained minute amounts of DNA that may be an advantage to evade a detrimental immune response following engraftment. The sodium deoxycholate generated ovarian scaffolds had higher donor DNA content, yet, retained the extracellular composition better and may therefore have improved recellularization and other downstream bioengineering applications. These two novel types of mouse ovarian scaffolds serve as promising scaffold-candidates for future ovarian bioengineering experiments. BioMed Central 2019-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6588934/ /pubmed/31228949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0531-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Alshaikh, Ahmed Baker Padma, Arvind Manikantan Dehlin, Matilda Akouri, Randa Song, Min Jong Brännström, Mats Hellström, Mats Decellularization of the mouse ovary: comparison of different scaffold generation protocols for future ovarian bioengineering |
title | Decellularization of the mouse ovary: comparison of different scaffold generation protocols for future ovarian bioengineering |
title_full | Decellularization of the mouse ovary: comparison of different scaffold generation protocols for future ovarian bioengineering |
title_fullStr | Decellularization of the mouse ovary: comparison of different scaffold generation protocols for future ovarian bioengineering |
title_full_unstemmed | Decellularization of the mouse ovary: comparison of different scaffold generation protocols for future ovarian bioengineering |
title_short | Decellularization of the mouse ovary: comparison of different scaffold generation protocols for future ovarian bioengineering |
title_sort | decellularization of the mouse ovary: comparison of different scaffold generation protocols for future ovarian bioengineering |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31228949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0531-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alshaikhahmedbaker decellularizationofthemouseovarycomparisonofdifferentscaffoldgenerationprotocolsforfutureovarianbioengineering AT padmaarvindmanikantan decellularizationofthemouseovarycomparisonofdifferentscaffoldgenerationprotocolsforfutureovarianbioengineering AT dehlinmatilda decellularizationofthemouseovarycomparisonofdifferentscaffoldgenerationprotocolsforfutureovarianbioengineering AT akouriranda decellularizationofthemouseovarycomparisonofdifferentscaffoldgenerationprotocolsforfutureovarianbioengineering AT songminjong decellularizationofthemouseovarycomparisonofdifferentscaffoldgenerationprotocolsforfutureovarianbioengineering AT brannstrommats decellularizationofthemouseovarycomparisonofdifferentscaffoldgenerationprotocolsforfutureovarianbioengineering AT hellstrommats decellularizationofthemouseovarycomparisonofdifferentscaffoldgenerationprotocolsforfutureovarianbioengineering |