Cargando…

Does a simple web-based intervention facilitate the articulation of patients’ unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologists? A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether a preconsultation web-based intervention enables patients with diabetes to articulate their agenda in a consultation in the hospital outpatient clinic with their diabetologist. METHODS AND DESIGN: A qualitative study embedded in a pragmatic pilot randomised controlled t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frost, Julia, Gibson, Andy, Ukoumunne, Obioha, Vaidya, Bijay, Britten, Nicky
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31203240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026588
_version_ 1783429320312619008
author Frost, Julia
Gibson, Andy
Ukoumunne, Obioha
Vaidya, Bijay
Britten, Nicky
author_facet Frost, Julia
Gibson, Andy
Ukoumunne, Obioha
Vaidya, Bijay
Britten, Nicky
author_sort Frost, Julia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore whether a preconsultation web-based intervention enables patients with diabetes to articulate their agenda in a consultation in the hospital outpatient clinic with their diabetologist. METHODS AND DESIGN: A qualitative study embedded in a pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two city outpatient departments in England. PARTICIPANTS: 25 patients attending a follow-up consultation and 6 diabetologists. INTERVENTION: The PACE-D, a web-based tool adapted for patients with diabetes to use before their consultation to generate an agenda of topics to discuss with their diabetologist. DATA COLLECTION: 25 participants had their consultation with their diabetologist audio-recorded: 12 in the control arm and 13 in the intervention arm; 12 of the latter also had their PACE-D intervention session and a consultation recorded. Semi-structured interviews with 6 diabetologists, and 12 patients (6 in the intervention group and 6 in the control group). ANALYSIS: Thematic discourse analysis undertaken with patient representatives trained in qualitative data analysis techniques. RESULTS: We identified four consultation types: diabetologist facilitated; patient identified; consultant facilitated and patient initiated and patient ignored. We also identified three critical aspects that explained the production and utilisation of the agenda form: existing consultative style; orientation to the use of the intervention and impact on the consultation. Where patients and diabetologists have a shared preference for a consultant-led or patient-led consultation, the intervention augments effective communication and shared decision making. However, where preferences diverge (eg, there is a mismatch in patients' and diabetologists' preferences and orientations), the intervention does not improve the potential for shared decision making. CONCLUSION: A simple web-based intervention facilitates the articulation of patients’ unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologist, but only when pre-existing consultation styles and orientations already favour shared decision making. More needs to be done to translate patient empowerment in the consultation setting into genuine self-efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN75070242.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6588975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65889752019-07-05 Does a simple web-based intervention facilitate the articulation of patients’ unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologists? A qualitative study Frost, Julia Gibson, Andy Ukoumunne, Obioha Vaidya, Bijay Britten, Nicky BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVE: To explore whether a preconsultation web-based intervention enables patients with diabetes to articulate their agenda in a consultation in the hospital outpatient clinic with their diabetologist. METHODS AND DESIGN: A qualitative study embedded in a pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two city outpatient departments in England. PARTICIPANTS: 25 patients attending a follow-up consultation and 6 diabetologists. INTERVENTION: The PACE-D, a web-based tool adapted for patients with diabetes to use before their consultation to generate an agenda of topics to discuss with their diabetologist. DATA COLLECTION: 25 participants had their consultation with their diabetologist audio-recorded: 12 in the control arm and 13 in the intervention arm; 12 of the latter also had their PACE-D intervention session and a consultation recorded. Semi-structured interviews with 6 diabetologists, and 12 patients (6 in the intervention group and 6 in the control group). ANALYSIS: Thematic discourse analysis undertaken with patient representatives trained in qualitative data analysis techniques. RESULTS: We identified four consultation types: diabetologist facilitated; patient identified; consultant facilitated and patient initiated and patient ignored. We also identified three critical aspects that explained the production and utilisation of the agenda form: existing consultative style; orientation to the use of the intervention and impact on the consultation. Where patients and diabetologists have a shared preference for a consultant-led or patient-led consultation, the intervention augments effective communication and shared decision making. However, where preferences diverge (eg, there is a mismatch in patients' and diabetologists' preferences and orientations), the intervention does not improve the potential for shared decision making. CONCLUSION: A simple web-based intervention facilitates the articulation of patients’ unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologist, but only when pre-existing consultation styles and orientations already favour shared decision making. More needs to be done to translate patient empowerment in the consultation setting into genuine self-efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN75070242. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6588975/ /pubmed/31203240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026588 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Frost, Julia
Gibson, Andy
Ukoumunne, Obioha
Vaidya, Bijay
Britten, Nicky
Does a simple web-based intervention facilitate the articulation of patients’ unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologists? A qualitative study
title Does a simple web-based intervention facilitate the articulation of patients’ unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologists? A qualitative study
title_full Does a simple web-based intervention facilitate the articulation of patients’ unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologists? A qualitative study
title_fullStr Does a simple web-based intervention facilitate the articulation of patients’ unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologists? A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Does a simple web-based intervention facilitate the articulation of patients’ unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologists? A qualitative study
title_short Does a simple web-based intervention facilitate the articulation of patients’ unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologists? A qualitative study
title_sort does a simple web-based intervention facilitate the articulation of patients’ unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologists? a qualitative study
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31203240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026588
work_keys_str_mv AT frostjulia doesasimplewebbasedinterventionfacilitatethearticulationofpatientsunvoicedagendaforaconsultationwiththeirdiabetologistsaqualitativestudy
AT gibsonandy doesasimplewebbasedinterventionfacilitatethearticulationofpatientsunvoicedagendaforaconsultationwiththeirdiabetologistsaqualitativestudy
AT ukoumunneobioha doesasimplewebbasedinterventionfacilitatethearticulationofpatientsunvoicedagendaforaconsultationwiththeirdiabetologistsaqualitativestudy
AT vaidyabijay doesasimplewebbasedinterventionfacilitatethearticulationofpatientsunvoicedagendaforaconsultationwiththeirdiabetologistsaqualitativestudy
AT brittennicky doesasimplewebbasedinterventionfacilitatethearticulationofpatientsunvoicedagendaforaconsultationwiththeirdiabetologistsaqualitativestudy