Cargando…

Relative effectiveness of different forms of exercises for treatment of chronic low back pain: protocol for a systematic review incorporating Bayesian network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Exercise is considered as an effective intervention in the management of patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP). However, the relative effectiveness as well as the hierarchy of exercise interventions have not been well established, although various exercise options are available. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Chengfei, Chen, Guanghui, Yang, Hui, Hua, Zhen, Xu, Peng, Wong, Mansang, He, Chengqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025971
_version_ 1783429322683449344
author Gao, Chengfei
Chen, Guanghui
Yang, Hui
Hua, Zhen
Xu, Peng
Wong, Mansang
He, Chengqi
author_facet Gao, Chengfei
Chen, Guanghui
Yang, Hui
Hua, Zhen
Xu, Peng
Wong, Mansang
He, Chengqi
author_sort Gao, Chengfei
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Exercise is considered as an effective intervention in the management of patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP). However, the relative effectiveness as well as the hierarchy of exercise interventions have not been well established, although various exercise options are available. Therefore, the present protocol proposes to conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of different forms of exercise for treatment of cLBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database will be searched to identify all randomised controlled trials that evaluate the effectiveness of exercise in the treatment of cLBP. There will be no restrictions on date or language. Two authors will screen the literature and extract data independently based on predesigned rules, and evaluate the risk of bias of included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or consultation with a senior reviewer. The primary outcomes of this study will be pain relief and improvement in function or disability for all interventions. Traditional pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian NMA will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of different exercise interventions. The ranking probabilities for all interventions will be estimated and the hierarchy of each intervention will be summarised as surface under the cumulative ranking curve. The quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation instrument. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval and informed consent are not required since this is a protocol for a meta-analysis with no confidential personal data to be collected. The results of this NMA will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018090576.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6588985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65889852019-07-05 Relative effectiveness of different forms of exercises for treatment of chronic low back pain: protocol for a systematic review incorporating Bayesian network meta-analysis Gao, Chengfei Chen, Guanghui Yang, Hui Hua, Zhen Xu, Peng Wong, Mansang He, Chengqi BMJ Open Sports and Exercise Medicine INTRODUCTION: Exercise is considered as an effective intervention in the management of patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP). However, the relative effectiveness as well as the hierarchy of exercise interventions have not been well established, although various exercise options are available. Therefore, the present protocol proposes to conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of different forms of exercise for treatment of cLBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database will be searched to identify all randomised controlled trials that evaluate the effectiveness of exercise in the treatment of cLBP. There will be no restrictions on date or language. Two authors will screen the literature and extract data independently based on predesigned rules, and evaluate the risk of bias of included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or consultation with a senior reviewer. The primary outcomes of this study will be pain relief and improvement in function or disability for all interventions. Traditional pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian NMA will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of different exercise interventions. The ranking probabilities for all interventions will be estimated and the hierarchy of each intervention will be summarised as surface under the cumulative ranking curve. The quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation instrument. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval and informed consent are not required since this is a protocol for a meta-analysis with no confidential personal data to be collected. The results of this NMA will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018090576. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6588985/ /pubmed/31217314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025971 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Sports and Exercise Medicine
Gao, Chengfei
Chen, Guanghui
Yang, Hui
Hua, Zhen
Xu, Peng
Wong, Mansang
He, Chengqi
Relative effectiveness of different forms of exercises for treatment of chronic low back pain: protocol for a systematic review incorporating Bayesian network meta-analysis
title Relative effectiveness of different forms of exercises for treatment of chronic low back pain: protocol for a systematic review incorporating Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full Relative effectiveness of different forms of exercises for treatment of chronic low back pain: protocol for a systematic review incorporating Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Relative effectiveness of different forms of exercises for treatment of chronic low back pain: protocol for a systematic review incorporating Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Relative effectiveness of different forms of exercises for treatment of chronic low back pain: protocol for a systematic review incorporating Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_short Relative effectiveness of different forms of exercises for treatment of chronic low back pain: protocol for a systematic review incorporating Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_sort relative effectiveness of different forms of exercises for treatment of chronic low back pain: protocol for a systematic review incorporating bayesian network meta-analysis
topic Sports and Exercise Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025971
work_keys_str_mv AT gaochengfei relativeeffectivenessofdifferentformsofexercisesfortreatmentofchroniclowbackpainprotocolforasystematicreviewincorporatingbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenguanghui relativeeffectivenessofdifferentformsofexercisesfortreatmentofchroniclowbackpainprotocolforasystematicreviewincorporatingbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT yanghui relativeeffectivenessofdifferentformsofexercisesfortreatmentofchroniclowbackpainprotocolforasystematicreviewincorporatingbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT huazhen relativeeffectivenessofdifferentformsofexercisesfortreatmentofchroniclowbackpainprotocolforasystematicreviewincorporatingbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT xupeng relativeeffectivenessofdifferentformsofexercisesfortreatmentofchroniclowbackpainprotocolforasystematicreviewincorporatingbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT wongmansang relativeeffectivenessofdifferentformsofexercisesfortreatmentofchroniclowbackpainprotocolforasystematicreviewincorporatingbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT hechengqi relativeeffectivenessofdifferentformsofexercisesfortreatmentofchroniclowbackpainprotocolforasystematicreviewincorporatingbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis