Cargando…

Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study

OBJECTIVE: To capture stakeholders’ theories concerning how and in what contexts robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into routine practice. DESIGN: A literature review provided tentative theories that were revised through a realist interview study. Literature-based theories were presented to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Randell, Rebecca, Honey, Stephanie, Alvarado, Natasha, Greenhalgh, Joanne, Hindmarsh, Jon, Pearman, Alan, Jayne, David, Gardner, Peter, Gill, Arron, Kotze, Alwyn, Dowding, Dawn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31203248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028635
_version_ 1783429329165746176
author Randell, Rebecca
Honey, Stephanie
Alvarado, Natasha
Greenhalgh, Joanne
Hindmarsh, Jon
Pearman, Alan
Jayne, David
Gardner, Peter
Gill, Arron
Kotze, Alwyn
Dowding, Dawn
author_facet Randell, Rebecca
Honey, Stephanie
Alvarado, Natasha
Greenhalgh, Joanne
Hindmarsh, Jon
Pearman, Alan
Jayne, David
Gardner, Peter
Gill, Arron
Kotze, Alwyn
Dowding, Dawn
author_sort Randell, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To capture stakeholders’ theories concerning how and in what contexts robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into routine practice. DESIGN: A literature review provided tentative theories that were revised through a realist interview study. Literature-based theories were presented to the interviewees, who were asked to describe to what extent and in what ways those theories reflected their experience. Analysis focused on identifying mechanisms through which robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into practice and contexts in which those mechanisms are triggered. SETTING: Nine hospitals in England where robot-assisted surgery is used for colorectal operations. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four theatre staff with experience of robot-assisted colorectal surgery, including surgeons, surgical trainees, theatre nurses, operating department practitioners and anaesthetists. RESULTS: Interviewees emphasised the importance of support from hospital management, team leaders and surgical colleagues. Training together as a team was seen as beneficial, increasing trust in each other’s knowledge and supporting team bonding, in turn leading to improved teamwork. When first introducing robot-assisted surgery, it is beneficial to have a handpicked dedicated robotic team who are able to quickly gain experience and confidence. A suitably sized operating theatre can reduce operation duration and the risk of de-sterilisation. Motivation among team members to persist with robot-assisted surgery can be achieved without involvement in the initial decision to purchase a robot, but training that enables team members to feel confident as they take on the new tasks is essential. CONCLUSIONS: We captured accounts of how robot-assisted surgery has been introduced into a range of hospitals. Using a realist approach, we were also able to capture perceptions of the factors that support and constrain the integration of robot-assisted surgery into routine practice. We have translated these into recommendations that can inform future implementations of robot-assisted surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6589012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65890122019-07-05 Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study Randell, Rebecca Honey, Stephanie Alvarado, Natasha Greenhalgh, Joanne Hindmarsh, Jon Pearman, Alan Jayne, David Gardner, Peter Gill, Arron Kotze, Alwyn Dowding, Dawn BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To capture stakeholders’ theories concerning how and in what contexts robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into routine practice. DESIGN: A literature review provided tentative theories that were revised through a realist interview study. Literature-based theories were presented to the interviewees, who were asked to describe to what extent and in what ways those theories reflected their experience. Analysis focused on identifying mechanisms through which robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into practice and contexts in which those mechanisms are triggered. SETTING: Nine hospitals in England where robot-assisted surgery is used for colorectal operations. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four theatre staff with experience of robot-assisted colorectal surgery, including surgeons, surgical trainees, theatre nurses, operating department practitioners and anaesthetists. RESULTS: Interviewees emphasised the importance of support from hospital management, team leaders and surgical colleagues. Training together as a team was seen as beneficial, increasing trust in each other’s knowledge and supporting team bonding, in turn leading to improved teamwork. When first introducing robot-assisted surgery, it is beneficial to have a handpicked dedicated robotic team who are able to quickly gain experience and confidence. A suitably sized operating theatre can reduce operation duration and the risk of de-sterilisation. Motivation among team members to persist with robot-assisted surgery can be achieved without involvement in the initial decision to purchase a robot, but training that enables team members to feel confident as they take on the new tasks is essential. CONCLUSIONS: We captured accounts of how robot-assisted surgery has been introduced into a range of hospitals. Using a realist approach, we were also able to capture perceptions of the factors that support and constrain the integration of robot-assisted surgery into routine practice. We have translated these into recommendations that can inform future implementations of robot-assisted surgery. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6589012/ /pubmed/31203248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028635 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Randell, Rebecca
Honey, Stephanie
Alvarado, Natasha
Greenhalgh, Joanne
Hindmarsh, Jon
Pearman, Alan
Jayne, David
Gardner, Peter
Gill, Arron
Kotze, Alwyn
Dowding, Dawn
Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study
title Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study
title_full Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study
title_fullStr Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study
title_full_unstemmed Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study
title_short Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study
title_sort factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31203248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028635
work_keys_str_mv AT randellrebecca factorssupportingandconstrainingtheimplementationofrobotassistedsurgeryarealistinterviewstudy
AT honeystephanie factorssupportingandconstrainingtheimplementationofrobotassistedsurgeryarealistinterviewstudy
AT alvaradonatasha factorssupportingandconstrainingtheimplementationofrobotassistedsurgeryarealistinterviewstudy
AT greenhalghjoanne factorssupportingandconstrainingtheimplementationofrobotassistedsurgeryarealistinterviewstudy
AT hindmarshjon factorssupportingandconstrainingtheimplementationofrobotassistedsurgeryarealistinterviewstudy
AT pearmanalan factorssupportingandconstrainingtheimplementationofrobotassistedsurgeryarealistinterviewstudy
AT jaynedavid factorssupportingandconstrainingtheimplementationofrobotassistedsurgeryarealistinterviewstudy
AT gardnerpeter factorssupportingandconstrainingtheimplementationofrobotassistedsurgeryarealistinterviewstudy
AT gillarron factorssupportingandconstrainingtheimplementationofrobotassistedsurgeryarealistinterviewstudy
AT kotzealwyn factorssupportingandconstrainingtheimplementationofrobotassistedsurgeryarealistinterviewstudy
AT dowdingdawn factorssupportingandconstrainingtheimplementationofrobotassistedsurgeryarealistinterviewstudy