Cargando…

A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up

BACKGROUND: To compare the mid-long-term clinical and radiological outcomes between a combination of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with vascularized greater trochanter flap (Group A) and isolate iliac bone graft (Group B) in the treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH). METHODS: F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Wenjun, Chen, Jinlun, Wu, Keliang, Lu, Lu, Deng, Peng, Ye, Pengcheng, Cao, Houran, Li, Jie, Zeng, Jianchun, Jie, Ke, Qi, Xinyu, Zeng, Yirong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31228939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2613-1
_version_ 1783429346496610304
author Feng, Wenjun
Chen, Jinlun
Wu, Keliang
Lu, Lu
Deng, Peng
Ye, Pengcheng
Cao, Houran
Li, Jie
Zeng, Jianchun
Jie, Ke
Qi, Xinyu
Zeng, Yirong
author_facet Feng, Wenjun
Chen, Jinlun
Wu, Keliang
Lu, Lu
Deng, Peng
Ye, Pengcheng
Cao, Houran
Li, Jie
Zeng, Jianchun
Jie, Ke
Qi, Xinyu
Zeng, Yirong
author_sort Feng, Wenjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the mid-long-term clinical and radiological outcomes between a combination of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with vascularized greater trochanter flap (Group A) and isolate iliac bone graft (Group B) in the treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH). METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2012, 123 patients (135 hips) who underwent abovementioned hip-preserving surgeries were included for analysis. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on Harris Hip Score (HHS) System and The Western Ontario and McMaster University Index (WOMAC) scores between the preoperative and the last follow-up. A series of postoperative X-rays were compared to preoperative images for radiological evaluation. RESULTS: The HHS in Group A and B were enhanced from 50.57 ± 3.39 to 87.60 ± 4.15 and from 50.24 ± 3.30 to 85.18 ± 6.45, respectively, which both showed significance between preoperative and postoperative latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Group A revealed better improvement in terms of HHS (p = 0.017). The WOMAC total, postoperative stiffness, difficulty subscale scores in Group A showed better outcomes when compared to Group B (p < 0.01), while pain improvement between these two groups revealed no significance (p = 0.402). Besides, Group A suggested better necrotic region repair (p = 0.020), but no femoral head collapse difference in terms of Association Research Circulation Osseous classification change was found (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft and concurrent vascularized greater trochanter flap with the lateral femoral circumflex transverse branch has been proved can obtain better functional and radiological results than isolate iliac bone grafting, which is attributed to blood reconstruction of the femoral head.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6589174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65891742019-06-24 A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up Feng, Wenjun Chen, Jinlun Wu, Keliang Lu, Lu Deng, Peng Ye, Pengcheng Cao, Houran Li, Jie Zeng, Jianchun Jie, Ke Qi, Xinyu Zeng, Yirong BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the mid-long-term clinical and radiological outcomes between a combination of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with vascularized greater trochanter flap (Group A) and isolate iliac bone graft (Group B) in the treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH). METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2012, 123 patients (135 hips) who underwent abovementioned hip-preserving surgeries were included for analysis. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on Harris Hip Score (HHS) System and The Western Ontario and McMaster University Index (WOMAC) scores between the preoperative and the last follow-up. A series of postoperative X-rays were compared to preoperative images for radiological evaluation. RESULTS: The HHS in Group A and B were enhanced from 50.57 ± 3.39 to 87.60 ± 4.15 and from 50.24 ± 3.30 to 85.18 ± 6.45, respectively, which both showed significance between preoperative and postoperative latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Group A revealed better improvement in terms of HHS (p = 0.017). The WOMAC total, postoperative stiffness, difficulty subscale scores in Group A showed better outcomes when compared to Group B (p < 0.01), while pain improvement between these two groups revealed no significance (p = 0.402). Besides, Group A suggested better necrotic region repair (p = 0.020), but no femoral head collapse difference in terms of Association Research Circulation Osseous classification change was found (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft and concurrent vascularized greater trochanter flap with the lateral femoral circumflex transverse branch has been proved can obtain better functional and radiological results than isolate iliac bone grafting, which is attributed to blood reconstruction of the femoral head. BioMed Central 2019-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6589174/ /pubmed/31228939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2613-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feng, Wenjun
Chen, Jinlun
Wu, Keliang
Lu, Lu
Deng, Peng
Ye, Pengcheng
Cao, Houran
Li, Jie
Zeng, Jianchun
Jie, Ke
Qi, Xinyu
Zeng, Yirong
A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up
title A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up
title_full A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up
title_fullStr A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up
title_short A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up
title_sort comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31228939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2613-1
work_keys_str_mv AT fengwenjun acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT chenjinlun acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT wukeliang acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT lulu acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT dengpeng acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT yepengcheng acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT caohouran acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT lijie acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT zengjianchun acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT jieke acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT qixinyu acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT zengyirong acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT fengwenjun comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT chenjinlun comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT wukeliang comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT lulu comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT dengpeng comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT yepengcheng comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT caohouran comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT lijie comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT zengjianchun comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT jieke comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT qixinyu comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup
AT zengyirong comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup