Cargando…
A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up
BACKGROUND: To compare the mid-long-term clinical and radiological outcomes between a combination of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with vascularized greater trochanter flap (Group A) and isolate iliac bone graft (Group B) in the treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH). METHODS: F...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31228939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2613-1 |
_version_ | 1783429346496610304 |
---|---|
author | Feng, Wenjun Chen, Jinlun Wu, Keliang Lu, Lu Deng, Peng Ye, Pengcheng Cao, Houran Li, Jie Zeng, Jianchun Jie, Ke Qi, Xinyu Zeng, Yirong |
author_facet | Feng, Wenjun Chen, Jinlun Wu, Keliang Lu, Lu Deng, Peng Ye, Pengcheng Cao, Houran Li, Jie Zeng, Jianchun Jie, Ke Qi, Xinyu Zeng, Yirong |
author_sort | Feng, Wenjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the mid-long-term clinical and radiological outcomes between a combination of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with vascularized greater trochanter flap (Group A) and isolate iliac bone graft (Group B) in the treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH). METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2012, 123 patients (135 hips) who underwent abovementioned hip-preserving surgeries were included for analysis. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on Harris Hip Score (HHS) System and The Western Ontario and McMaster University Index (WOMAC) scores between the preoperative and the last follow-up. A series of postoperative X-rays were compared to preoperative images for radiological evaluation. RESULTS: The HHS in Group A and B were enhanced from 50.57 ± 3.39 to 87.60 ± 4.15 and from 50.24 ± 3.30 to 85.18 ± 6.45, respectively, which both showed significance between preoperative and postoperative latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Group A revealed better improvement in terms of HHS (p = 0.017). The WOMAC total, postoperative stiffness, difficulty subscale scores in Group A showed better outcomes when compared to Group B (p < 0.01), while pain improvement between these two groups revealed no significance (p = 0.402). Besides, Group A suggested better necrotic region repair (p = 0.020), but no femoral head collapse difference in terms of Association Research Circulation Osseous classification change was found (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft and concurrent vascularized greater trochanter flap with the lateral femoral circumflex transverse branch has been proved can obtain better functional and radiological results than isolate iliac bone grafting, which is attributed to blood reconstruction of the femoral head. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6589174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65891742019-06-24 A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up Feng, Wenjun Chen, Jinlun Wu, Keliang Lu, Lu Deng, Peng Ye, Pengcheng Cao, Houran Li, Jie Zeng, Jianchun Jie, Ke Qi, Xinyu Zeng, Yirong BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the mid-long-term clinical and radiological outcomes between a combination of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with vascularized greater trochanter flap (Group A) and isolate iliac bone graft (Group B) in the treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH). METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2012, 123 patients (135 hips) who underwent abovementioned hip-preserving surgeries were included for analysis. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on Harris Hip Score (HHS) System and The Western Ontario and McMaster University Index (WOMAC) scores between the preoperative and the last follow-up. A series of postoperative X-rays were compared to preoperative images for radiological evaluation. RESULTS: The HHS in Group A and B were enhanced from 50.57 ± 3.39 to 87.60 ± 4.15 and from 50.24 ± 3.30 to 85.18 ± 6.45, respectively, which both showed significance between preoperative and postoperative latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Group A revealed better improvement in terms of HHS (p = 0.017). The WOMAC total, postoperative stiffness, difficulty subscale scores in Group A showed better outcomes when compared to Group B (p < 0.01), while pain improvement between these two groups revealed no significance (p = 0.402). Besides, Group A suggested better necrotic region repair (p = 0.020), but no femoral head collapse difference in terms of Association Research Circulation Osseous classification change was found (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft and concurrent vascularized greater trochanter flap with the lateral femoral circumflex transverse branch has been proved can obtain better functional and radiological results than isolate iliac bone grafting, which is attributed to blood reconstruction of the femoral head. BioMed Central 2019-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6589174/ /pubmed/31228939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2613-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Feng, Wenjun Chen, Jinlun Wu, Keliang Lu, Lu Deng, Peng Ye, Pengcheng Cao, Houran Li, Jie Zeng, Jianchun Jie, Ke Qi, Xinyu Zeng, Yirong A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up |
title | A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up |
title_full | A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up |
title_fullStr | A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up |
title_short | A comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up |
title_sort | comparative study of cortico-cancellous iliac bone graft with or without the combination of vascularized greater trochanter flap for the management of femoral head osteonecrosis: a minimum 6 years follow-up |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31228939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2613-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fengwenjun acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT chenjinlun acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT wukeliang acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT lulu acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT dengpeng acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT yepengcheng acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT caohouran acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT lijie acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT zengjianchun acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT jieke acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT qixinyu acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT zengyirong acomparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT fengwenjun comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT chenjinlun comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT wukeliang comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT lulu comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT dengpeng comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT yepengcheng comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT caohouran comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT lijie comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT zengjianchun comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT jieke comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT qixinyu comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup AT zengyirong comparativestudyofcorticocancellousiliacbonegraftwithorwithoutthecombinationofvascularizedgreatertrochanterflapforthemanagementoffemoralheadosteonecrosisaminimum6yearsfollowup |