Cargando…

Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study

BACKGROUND: To determine if mammographic features from deep learning networks can be applied in breast cancer to identify groups at interval invasive cancer risk due to masking beyond using traditional breast density measures. METHODS: Full-field digital screening mammograms acquired in our clinics...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hinton, Benjamin, Ma, Lin, Mahmoudzadeh, Amir Pasha, Malkov, Serghei, Fan, Bo, Greenwood, Heather, Joe, Bonnie, Lee, Vivian, Kerlikowske, Karla, Shepherd, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31228956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-019-0227-3
_version_ 1783429347469688832
author Hinton, Benjamin
Ma, Lin
Mahmoudzadeh, Amir Pasha
Malkov, Serghei
Fan, Bo
Greenwood, Heather
Joe, Bonnie
Lee, Vivian
Kerlikowske, Karla
Shepherd, John
author_facet Hinton, Benjamin
Ma, Lin
Mahmoudzadeh, Amir Pasha
Malkov, Serghei
Fan, Bo
Greenwood, Heather
Joe, Bonnie
Lee, Vivian
Kerlikowske, Karla
Shepherd, John
author_sort Hinton, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine if mammographic features from deep learning networks can be applied in breast cancer to identify groups at interval invasive cancer risk due to masking beyond using traditional breast density measures. METHODS: Full-field digital screening mammograms acquired in our clinics between 2006 and 2015 were reviewed. Transfer learning of a deep learning network with weights initialized from ImageNet was performed to classify mammograms that were followed by an invasive interval or screen-detected cancer within 12 months of the mammogram. Hyperparameter optimization was performed and the network was visualized through saliency maps. Prediction loss and accuracy were calculated using this deep learning network. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) values were generated with the outcome of interval cancer using the deep learning network and compared to predictions from conditional logistic regression with errors quantified through contingency tables. RESULTS: Pre-cancer mammograms of 182 interval and 173 screen-detected cancers were split into training/test cases at an 80/20 ratio. Using Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density alone, the ability to correctly classify interval cancers was moderate (AUC = 0.65). The optimized deep learning model achieved an AUC of 0.82. Contingency table analysis showed the network was correctly classifying 75.2% of the mammograms and that incorrect classifications were slightly more common for the interval cancer mammograms. Saliency maps of each cancer case found that local information could highly drive classification of cases more than global image information. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-cancerous mammograms contain imaging information beyond breast density that can be identified with deep learning networks to predict the probability of breast cancer detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6589178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65891782019-06-24 Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study Hinton, Benjamin Ma, Lin Mahmoudzadeh, Amir Pasha Malkov, Serghei Fan, Bo Greenwood, Heather Joe, Bonnie Lee, Vivian Kerlikowske, Karla Shepherd, John Cancer Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: To determine if mammographic features from deep learning networks can be applied in breast cancer to identify groups at interval invasive cancer risk due to masking beyond using traditional breast density measures. METHODS: Full-field digital screening mammograms acquired in our clinics between 2006 and 2015 were reviewed. Transfer learning of a deep learning network with weights initialized from ImageNet was performed to classify mammograms that were followed by an invasive interval or screen-detected cancer within 12 months of the mammogram. Hyperparameter optimization was performed and the network was visualized through saliency maps. Prediction loss and accuracy were calculated using this deep learning network. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) values were generated with the outcome of interval cancer using the deep learning network and compared to predictions from conditional logistic regression with errors quantified through contingency tables. RESULTS: Pre-cancer mammograms of 182 interval and 173 screen-detected cancers were split into training/test cases at an 80/20 ratio. Using Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density alone, the ability to correctly classify interval cancers was moderate (AUC = 0.65). The optimized deep learning model achieved an AUC of 0.82. Contingency table analysis showed the network was correctly classifying 75.2% of the mammograms and that incorrect classifications were slightly more common for the interval cancer mammograms. Saliency maps of each cancer case found that local information could highly drive classification of cases more than global image information. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-cancerous mammograms contain imaging information beyond breast density that can be identified with deep learning networks to predict the probability of breast cancer detection. BioMed Central 2019-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6589178/ /pubmed/31228956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-019-0227-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hinton, Benjamin
Ma, Lin
Mahmoudzadeh, Amir Pasha
Malkov, Serghei
Fan, Bo
Greenwood, Heather
Joe, Bonnie
Lee, Vivian
Kerlikowske, Karla
Shepherd, John
Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study
title Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study
title_full Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study
title_fullStr Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study
title_full_unstemmed Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study
title_short Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study
title_sort deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31228956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-019-0227-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hintonbenjamin deeplearningnetworksfinduniquemammographicdifferencesinpreviousnegativemammogramsbetweenintervalandscreendetectedcancersacasecasestudy
AT malin deeplearningnetworksfinduniquemammographicdifferencesinpreviousnegativemammogramsbetweenintervalandscreendetectedcancersacasecasestudy
AT mahmoudzadehamirpasha deeplearningnetworksfinduniquemammographicdifferencesinpreviousnegativemammogramsbetweenintervalandscreendetectedcancersacasecasestudy
AT malkovserghei deeplearningnetworksfinduniquemammographicdifferencesinpreviousnegativemammogramsbetweenintervalandscreendetectedcancersacasecasestudy
AT fanbo deeplearningnetworksfinduniquemammographicdifferencesinpreviousnegativemammogramsbetweenintervalandscreendetectedcancersacasecasestudy
AT greenwoodheather deeplearningnetworksfinduniquemammographicdifferencesinpreviousnegativemammogramsbetweenintervalandscreendetectedcancersacasecasestudy
AT joebonnie deeplearningnetworksfinduniquemammographicdifferencesinpreviousnegativemammogramsbetweenintervalandscreendetectedcancersacasecasestudy
AT leevivian deeplearningnetworksfinduniquemammographicdifferencesinpreviousnegativemammogramsbetweenintervalandscreendetectedcancersacasecasestudy
AT kerlikowskekarla deeplearningnetworksfinduniquemammographicdifferencesinpreviousnegativemammogramsbetweenintervalandscreendetectedcancersacasecasestudy
AT shepherdjohn deeplearningnetworksfinduniquemammographicdifferencesinpreviousnegativemammogramsbetweenintervalandscreendetectedcancersacasecasestudy